Cargando…

Priority effects and density promote coexistence between the facultative predator Chrysomya rufifacies and its competitor Calliphora stygia

Highly competitive ephemeral resources like carrion tend to support much greater diversity relative to longer-lived resources. The coexistence of diverse communities on short-lived carrion is a delicate balance, maintained by several processes including competition. Despite this balance, few studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dawson, Blake M., Wallman, James F., Evans, Maldwyn J., Butterworth, Nathan J., Barton, Philip S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9119899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05175-y
_version_ 1784710793155051520
author Dawson, Blake M.
Wallman, James F.
Evans, Maldwyn J.
Butterworth, Nathan J.
Barton, Philip S.
author_facet Dawson, Blake M.
Wallman, James F.
Evans, Maldwyn J.
Butterworth, Nathan J.
Barton, Philip S.
author_sort Dawson, Blake M.
collection PubMed
description Highly competitive ephemeral resources like carrion tend to support much greater diversity relative to longer-lived resources. The coexistence of diverse communities on short-lived carrion is a delicate balance, maintained by several processes including competition. Despite this balance, few studies have investigated the effect of competition on carrion, limiting our understanding of how competition drives coexistence. We investigated how priority effects and larval density influence coexistence between two blowfly species, the facultative predator Chrysomya rufifacies and its competitor Calliphora stygia, which occupy broadly similar niches but differ in their ecological strategies for exploiting carrion. We examined how adult oviposition, larval survival, developmental duration, and adult fitness were affected by the presence of differently aged heterospecific larval masses, and how these measures varied under three larval densities. We found C. rufifacies larval survival was lowest in conspecific masses with low larval densities. In heterospecific masses, survival increased, particularly at high larval density, with priority effects having minimal effect, suggesting a dependency on collective exodigestion. For C. stygia, we found survival to be constant across larval densities in a conspecific mass. In heterospecific masses, survival decreased drastically when C. rufifacies arrived first, regardless of larval density, suggesting C. stygia is temporally constrained to avoid competition with C. rufifacies. Neither species appeared to completely outcompete the other, as they were either constrained by density requirements (C. rufifacies) or priority effects (C. stygia). Our results provide new mechanistic insights into the ecological processes allowing for coexistence on a competitively intense, ephemeral resource such as carrion. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-022-05175-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9119899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91198992022-05-21 Priority effects and density promote coexistence between the facultative predator Chrysomya rufifacies and its competitor Calliphora stygia Dawson, Blake M. Wallman, James F. Evans, Maldwyn J. Butterworth, Nathan J. Barton, Philip S. Oecologia Community Ecology–Original Research Highly competitive ephemeral resources like carrion tend to support much greater diversity relative to longer-lived resources. The coexistence of diverse communities on short-lived carrion is a delicate balance, maintained by several processes including competition. Despite this balance, few studies have investigated the effect of competition on carrion, limiting our understanding of how competition drives coexistence. We investigated how priority effects and larval density influence coexistence between two blowfly species, the facultative predator Chrysomya rufifacies and its competitor Calliphora stygia, which occupy broadly similar niches but differ in their ecological strategies for exploiting carrion. We examined how adult oviposition, larval survival, developmental duration, and adult fitness were affected by the presence of differently aged heterospecific larval masses, and how these measures varied under three larval densities. We found C. rufifacies larval survival was lowest in conspecific masses with low larval densities. In heterospecific masses, survival increased, particularly at high larval density, with priority effects having minimal effect, suggesting a dependency on collective exodigestion. For C. stygia, we found survival to be constant across larval densities in a conspecific mass. In heterospecific masses, survival decreased drastically when C. rufifacies arrived first, regardless of larval density, suggesting C. stygia is temporally constrained to avoid competition with C. rufifacies. Neither species appeared to completely outcompete the other, as they were either constrained by density requirements (C. rufifacies) or priority effects (C. stygia). Our results provide new mechanistic insights into the ecological processes allowing for coexistence on a competitively intense, ephemeral resource such as carrion. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-022-05175-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-05-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9119899/ /pubmed/35501402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05175-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Community Ecology–Original Research
Dawson, Blake M.
Wallman, James F.
Evans, Maldwyn J.
Butterworth, Nathan J.
Barton, Philip S.
Priority effects and density promote coexistence between the facultative predator Chrysomya rufifacies and its competitor Calliphora stygia
title Priority effects and density promote coexistence between the facultative predator Chrysomya rufifacies and its competitor Calliphora stygia
title_full Priority effects and density promote coexistence between the facultative predator Chrysomya rufifacies and its competitor Calliphora stygia
title_fullStr Priority effects and density promote coexistence between the facultative predator Chrysomya rufifacies and its competitor Calliphora stygia
title_full_unstemmed Priority effects and density promote coexistence between the facultative predator Chrysomya rufifacies and its competitor Calliphora stygia
title_short Priority effects and density promote coexistence between the facultative predator Chrysomya rufifacies and its competitor Calliphora stygia
title_sort priority effects and density promote coexistence between the facultative predator chrysomya rufifacies and its competitor calliphora stygia
topic Community Ecology–Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9119899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05175-y
work_keys_str_mv AT dawsonblakem priorityeffectsanddensitypromotecoexistencebetweenthefacultativepredatorchrysomyarufifaciesanditscompetitorcalliphorastygia
AT wallmanjamesf priorityeffectsanddensitypromotecoexistencebetweenthefacultativepredatorchrysomyarufifaciesanditscompetitorcalliphorastygia
AT evansmaldwynj priorityeffectsanddensitypromotecoexistencebetweenthefacultativepredatorchrysomyarufifaciesanditscompetitorcalliphorastygia
AT butterworthnathanj priorityeffectsanddensitypromotecoexistencebetweenthefacultativepredatorchrysomyarufifaciesanditscompetitorcalliphorastygia
AT bartonphilips priorityeffectsanddensitypromotecoexistencebetweenthefacultativepredatorchrysomyarufifaciesanditscompetitorcalliphorastygia