Cargando…

Insect vector manipulation by a plant virus and simulation modeling of its potential impact on crop infection

There is widespread evidence of plant viruses manipulating behavior of their insect vectors as a strategy to maximize infection of plants. Often, plant viruses and their insect vectors have multiple potential host plant species, and these may not overlap entirely. Moreover, insect vectors may not pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hyoseok, Stephanus, Andrew P., Fowles, Trevor M., Wintermantel, William M., Trumble, John T., Gilbertson, Robert L., Nansen, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9119975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35589977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12618-2
_version_ 1784710802810339328
author Lee, Hyoseok
Stephanus, Andrew P.
Fowles, Trevor M.
Wintermantel, William M.
Trumble, John T.
Gilbertson, Robert L.
Nansen, Christian
author_facet Lee, Hyoseok
Stephanus, Andrew P.
Fowles, Trevor M.
Wintermantel, William M.
Trumble, John T.
Gilbertson, Robert L.
Nansen, Christian
author_sort Lee, Hyoseok
collection PubMed
description There is widespread evidence of plant viruses manipulating behavior of their insect vectors as a strategy to maximize infection of plants. Often, plant viruses and their insect vectors have multiple potential host plant species, and these may not overlap entirely. Moreover, insect vectors may not prefer plant species to which plant viruses are well-adapted. In such cases, can plant viruses manipulate their insect vectors to preferentially feed and oviposit on plant species, which are suitable for viral propagation but less suitable for themselves? To address this question, we conducted dual- and no-choice feeding studies (number and duration of probing events) and oviposition studies with non-viruliferous and viruliferous [carrying beet curly top virus (BCTV)] beet leafhoppers [Circulifer tenellus (Baker)] on three plant species: barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), ribwort plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.), and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Barley is not a host of BCTV, whereas ribwort plantain and tomato are susceptible to BCTV infection and develop a symptomless infection and severe curly top symptoms, respectively. Ribwort plantain plants can be used to maintain beet leafhopper colonies for multiple generations (suitable), whereas tomato plants cannot be used to maintain beet leafhopper colonies (unsuitable). Based on dual- and no-choice experiments, we demonstrated that BCTV appears to manipulate probing preference and behavior by beet leafhoppers, whereas there was no significant difference in oviposition preference. Simulation modeling predicted that BCTV infection rates would to be higher in tomato fields with barley compared with ribwort plantain as a trap crop. Simulation model results supported the hypothesis that manipulation of probing preference and behavior may increase BCTV infection in tomato fields. Results presented were based on the BCTV-beet leafhopper pathosystem, but the approach taken (combination of experimental studies with complementary simulation modeling) is widely applicable and relevant to other insect-vectored plant pathogen systems involving multiple plant species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9119975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91199752022-05-21 Insect vector manipulation by a plant virus and simulation modeling of its potential impact on crop infection Lee, Hyoseok Stephanus, Andrew P. Fowles, Trevor M. Wintermantel, William M. Trumble, John T. Gilbertson, Robert L. Nansen, Christian Sci Rep Article There is widespread evidence of plant viruses manipulating behavior of their insect vectors as a strategy to maximize infection of plants. Often, plant viruses and their insect vectors have multiple potential host plant species, and these may not overlap entirely. Moreover, insect vectors may not prefer plant species to which plant viruses are well-adapted. In such cases, can plant viruses manipulate their insect vectors to preferentially feed and oviposit on plant species, which are suitable for viral propagation but less suitable for themselves? To address this question, we conducted dual- and no-choice feeding studies (number and duration of probing events) and oviposition studies with non-viruliferous and viruliferous [carrying beet curly top virus (BCTV)] beet leafhoppers [Circulifer tenellus (Baker)] on three plant species: barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), ribwort plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.), and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Barley is not a host of BCTV, whereas ribwort plantain and tomato are susceptible to BCTV infection and develop a symptomless infection and severe curly top symptoms, respectively. Ribwort plantain plants can be used to maintain beet leafhopper colonies for multiple generations (suitable), whereas tomato plants cannot be used to maintain beet leafhopper colonies (unsuitable). Based on dual- and no-choice experiments, we demonstrated that BCTV appears to manipulate probing preference and behavior by beet leafhoppers, whereas there was no significant difference in oviposition preference. Simulation modeling predicted that BCTV infection rates would to be higher in tomato fields with barley compared with ribwort plantain as a trap crop. Simulation model results supported the hypothesis that manipulation of probing preference and behavior may increase BCTV infection in tomato fields. Results presented were based on the BCTV-beet leafhopper pathosystem, but the approach taken (combination of experimental studies with complementary simulation modeling) is widely applicable and relevant to other insect-vectored plant pathogen systems involving multiple plant species. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9119975/ /pubmed/35589977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12618-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Hyoseok
Stephanus, Andrew P.
Fowles, Trevor M.
Wintermantel, William M.
Trumble, John T.
Gilbertson, Robert L.
Nansen, Christian
Insect vector manipulation by a plant virus and simulation modeling of its potential impact on crop infection
title Insect vector manipulation by a plant virus and simulation modeling of its potential impact on crop infection
title_full Insect vector manipulation by a plant virus and simulation modeling of its potential impact on crop infection
title_fullStr Insect vector manipulation by a plant virus and simulation modeling of its potential impact on crop infection
title_full_unstemmed Insect vector manipulation by a plant virus and simulation modeling of its potential impact on crop infection
title_short Insect vector manipulation by a plant virus and simulation modeling of its potential impact on crop infection
title_sort insect vector manipulation by a plant virus and simulation modeling of its potential impact on crop infection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9119975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35589977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12618-2
work_keys_str_mv AT leehyoseok insectvectormanipulationbyaplantvirusandsimulationmodelingofitspotentialimpactoncropinfection
AT stephanusandrewp insectvectormanipulationbyaplantvirusandsimulationmodelingofitspotentialimpactoncropinfection
AT fowlestrevorm insectvectormanipulationbyaplantvirusandsimulationmodelingofitspotentialimpactoncropinfection
AT wintermantelwilliamm insectvectormanipulationbyaplantvirusandsimulationmodelingofitspotentialimpactoncropinfection
AT trumblejohnt insectvectormanipulationbyaplantvirusandsimulationmodelingofitspotentialimpactoncropinfection
AT gilbertsonrobertl insectvectormanipulationbyaplantvirusandsimulationmodelingofitspotentialimpactoncropinfection
AT nansenchristian insectvectormanipulationbyaplantvirusandsimulationmodelingofitspotentialimpactoncropinfection