Cargando…

Guiding Ethics Review in Pharmacy Education Research and Scholarship at UBC: Clarifying the Unclear

While it goes without saying that ethically sound practices are imperative for high-quality educational scholarship, institutional ethics guidance is often unclear about how to treat educational scholarship generally, and quality improvement/assurance studies and the scholarship of teaching and lear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albon, Simon P., Hu, Franklin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601584
http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v12i3.3919
_version_ 1784710809832652800
author Albon, Simon P.
Hu, Franklin
author_facet Albon, Simon P.
Hu, Franklin
author_sort Albon, Simon P.
collection PubMed
description While it goes without saying that ethically sound practices are imperative for high-quality educational scholarship, institutional ethics guidance is often unclear about how to treat educational scholarship generally, and quality improvement/assurance studies and the scholarship of teaching and learning, specifically. Amongst health profession education researchers, including those in pharmacy, this lack of clarity has led to confusion regarding existing ethics governance and ambivalence regarding ethics requirements. Drawing on the experiences of one pharmacy school in western Canada, this commentary describes an ethics vetting guide developed explicitly to address current uncertainty about ethics requirements for pharmacy education scholarship. Clarifying the problem, describing the guide, and exploring what was learned along the way provide a basis for re-centering ethics in the development of scholarly projects and decision-making regarding formal ethics review. The importance of instilling ethical intelligence, delineating research from quality improvement/assurance work, and addressing current gaps in ethics oversight and governance of educational scholarship are among key lessons learned during guide development along with suggestions for new institutional ethics guidance directly targeting educational scholarship to supplement current national guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9120004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91200042022-05-20 Guiding Ethics Review in Pharmacy Education Research and Scholarship at UBC: Clarifying the Unclear Albon, Simon P. Hu, Franklin Innov Pharm Commentary While it goes without saying that ethically sound practices are imperative for high-quality educational scholarship, institutional ethics guidance is often unclear about how to treat educational scholarship generally, and quality improvement/assurance studies and the scholarship of teaching and learning, specifically. Amongst health profession education researchers, including those in pharmacy, this lack of clarity has led to confusion regarding existing ethics governance and ambivalence regarding ethics requirements. Drawing on the experiences of one pharmacy school in western Canada, this commentary describes an ethics vetting guide developed explicitly to address current uncertainty about ethics requirements for pharmacy education scholarship. Clarifying the problem, describing the guide, and exploring what was learned along the way provide a basis for re-centering ethics in the development of scholarly projects and decision-making regarding formal ethics review. The importance of instilling ethical intelligence, delineating research from quality improvement/assurance work, and addressing current gaps in ethics oversight and governance of educational scholarship are among key lessons learned during guide development along with suggestions for new institutional ethics guidance directly targeting educational scholarship to supplement current national guidelines. University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9120004/ /pubmed/35601584 http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v12i3.3919 Text en © Individual authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Albon, Simon P.
Hu, Franklin
Guiding Ethics Review in Pharmacy Education Research and Scholarship at UBC: Clarifying the Unclear
title Guiding Ethics Review in Pharmacy Education Research and Scholarship at UBC: Clarifying the Unclear
title_full Guiding Ethics Review in Pharmacy Education Research and Scholarship at UBC: Clarifying the Unclear
title_fullStr Guiding Ethics Review in Pharmacy Education Research and Scholarship at UBC: Clarifying the Unclear
title_full_unstemmed Guiding Ethics Review in Pharmacy Education Research and Scholarship at UBC: Clarifying the Unclear
title_short Guiding Ethics Review in Pharmacy Education Research and Scholarship at UBC: Clarifying the Unclear
title_sort guiding ethics review in pharmacy education research and scholarship at ubc: clarifying the unclear
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601584
http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v12i3.3919
work_keys_str_mv AT albonsimonp guidingethicsreviewinpharmacyeducationresearchandscholarshipatubcclarifyingtheunclear
AT hufranklin guidingethicsreviewinpharmacyeducationresearchandscholarshipatubcclarifyingtheunclear