Cargando…
Fusion of expert uncertain assessment in FMEA based on the negation of basic probability assignment and evidence distance
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) has been widely used for potential risk modeling and management. Expert evaluation is used to model the risk priority number to determine the risk level of different failure modes. Dempster–Shafer (D–S) evidence theory is an effective method for uncertain inf...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35589787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12360-9 |
_version_ | 1784710874930348032 |
---|---|
author | Yuan, Yusong Tang, Yongchuan |
author_facet | Yuan, Yusong Tang, Yongchuan |
author_sort | Yuan, Yusong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) has been widely used for potential risk modeling and management. Expert evaluation is used to model the risk priority number to determine the risk level of different failure modes. Dempster–Shafer (D–S) evidence theory is an effective method for uncertain information modeling and has been adopted to address the uncertainty in FMEA. How to deal with conflicting evidence from different experts is an open issue. At the same time, different professional backgrounds of experts may lead to different weights in modeling the evaluation. How to model the relative weight of an expert is an important problem. We propose an improved risk analysis method based on triangular fuzzy numbers, the negation of basic probability assignment (BPA) and the evidence distance in the frame of D–S evidence theory. First, we summarize and organize the expert’s risk analysis results. Then, we model the expert’s assessments based on the triangular fuzzy numbers as BPAs and calculate the negation of BPAs. Third, we model the weight of expert based on the evidence distance in the evidence theory. Finally, the Murphy’s combination rule is used to fuse the risk assessment results of different experts and calculate the new risk priority number (RPN). At the end of this paper, we apply the proposed method to analyze seventeen failure modes of aircraft turbine blades. The experimental results verify the rationality and effectiveness of this method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9120166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91201662022-05-21 Fusion of expert uncertain assessment in FMEA based on the negation of basic probability assignment and evidence distance Yuan, Yusong Tang, Yongchuan Sci Rep Article Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) has been widely used for potential risk modeling and management. Expert evaluation is used to model the risk priority number to determine the risk level of different failure modes. Dempster–Shafer (D–S) evidence theory is an effective method for uncertain information modeling and has been adopted to address the uncertainty in FMEA. How to deal with conflicting evidence from different experts is an open issue. At the same time, different professional backgrounds of experts may lead to different weights in modeling the evaluation. How to model the relative weight of an expert is an important problem. We propose an improved risk analysis method based on triangular fuzzy numbers, the negation of basic probability assignment (BPA) and the evidence distance in the frame of D–S evidence theory. First, we summarize and organize the expert’s risk analysis results. Then, we model the expert’s assessments based on the triangular fuzzy numbers as BPAs and calculate the negation of BPAs. Third, we model the weight of expert based on the evidence distance in the evidence theory. Finally, the Murphy’s combination rule is used to fuse the risk assessment results of different experts and calculate the new risk priority number (RPN). At the end of this paper, we apply the proposed method to analyze seventeen failure modes of aircraft turbine blades. The experimental results verify the rationality and effectiveness of this method. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9120166/ /pubmed/35589787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12360-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Yuan, Yusong Tang, Yongchuan Fusion of expert uncertain assessment in FMEA based on the negation of basic probability assignment and evidence distance |
title | Fusion of expert uncertain assessment in FMEA based on the negation of basic probability assignment and evidence distance |
title_full | Fusion of expert uncertain assessment in FMEA based on the negation of basic probability assignment and evidence distance |
title_fullStr | Fusion of expert uncertain assessment in FMEA based on the negation of basic probability assignment and evidence distance |
title_full_unstemmed | Fusion of expert uncertain assessment in FMEA based on the negation of basic probability assignment and evidence distance |
title_short | Fusion of expert uncertain assessment in FMEA based on the negation of basic probability assignment and evidence distance |
title_sort | fusion of expert uncertain assessment in fmea based on the negation of basic probability assignment and evidence distance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35589787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12360-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuanyusong fusionofexpertuncertainassessmentinfmeabasedonthenegationofbasicprobabilityassignmentandevidencedistance AT tangyongchuan fusionofexpertuncertainassessmentinfmeabasedonthenegationofbasicprobabilityassignmentandevidencedistance |