Cargando…
Safety and efficacy results of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) stent system in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: US pivotal trial
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) flow diverter in support of an application for Food and Drug Administration approval in the USA. METHODS: 145 patients were enrolled in a prospective, single-arm multicenter trial. Patients with ane...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34282038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017469 |
_version_ | 1784710917629411328 |
---|---|
author | McDougall, Cameron G Diaz, Orlando Boulos, Alan Siddiqui, Adnan H Caplan, Justin Fifi, Johanna T Turk, Aquilla S Kayan, Yasha Jabbour, Pascal Kim, Louis J Hetts, Steven W Cooke, Daniel L Dowd, Christopher F |
author_facet | McDougall, Cameron G Diaz, Orlando Boulos, Alan Siddiqui, Adnan H Caplan, Justin Fifi, Johanna T Turk, Aquilla S Kayan, Yasha Jabbour, Pascal Kim, Louis J Hetts, Steven W Cooke, Daniel L Dowd, Christopher F |
author_sort | McDougall, Cameron G |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) flow diverter in support of an application for Food and Drug Administration approval in the USA. METHODS: 145 patients were enrolled in a prospective, single-arm multicenter trial. Patients with aneurysms of unfavorable morphology for traditional endovascular therapies (large, wide-necked, fusiform, etc) were included. The trial was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority in both safety and effectiveness, comparing trial results with performance goals (PGs) established from peer-reviewed published literature. The primary safety endpoint was death or major stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥4 points) within 30 days of the procedure, or any major ipsilateral stroke or neurological death within the first year. The primary effectiveness endpoint was complete occlusion of the target aneurysm with ≤50% stenosis of the parent artery at 12 months after treatment, and in which an alternative treatment of the target intracranial aneurysm had not been performed. RESULTS: 145 patients underwent attempted placement of a FRED device, and one or more devices were placed in all 145 patients. 135/145 (93%) had a single device placed. Core laboratory adjudication deemed 106 (73.1%) of the aneurysms large or giant. A safety endpoint was experienced by 9/145 (6.2%) patients, successfully achieving the safety PG of <15%. The effectiveness PG of >46% aneurysm occlusion was also achieved, with the effectiveness endpoint being met in 80/139 (57.6%) CONCLUSION: As compared with historically derived performance benchmarks, the FRED flow diverter is both safe and effective for the treatment of appropriately selected intracranial aneurysms. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01801007 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9120407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91204072022-06-04 Safety and efficacy results of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) stent system in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: US pivotal trial McDougall, Cameron G Diaz, Orlando Boulos, Alan Siddiqui, Adnan H Caplan, Justin Fifi, Johanna T Turk, Aquilla S Kayan, Yasha Jabbour, Pascal Kim, Louis J Hetts, Steven W Cooke, Daniel L Dowd, Christopher F J Neurointerv Surg Hemorrhagic Stroke OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) flow diverter in support of an application for Food and Drug Administration approval in the USA. METHODS: 145 patients were enrolled in a prospective, single-arm multicenter trial. Patients with aneurysms of unfavorable morphology for traditional endovascular therapies (large, wide-necked, fusiform, etc) were included. The trial was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority in both safety and effectiveness, comparing trial results with performance goals (PGs) established from peer-reviewed published literature. The primary safety endpoint was death or major stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥4 points) within 30 days of the procedure, or any major ipsilateral stroke or neurological death within the first year. The primary effectiveness endpoint was complete occlusion of the target aneurysm with ≤50% stenosis of the parent artery at 12 months after treatment, and in which an alternative treatment of the target intracranial aneurysm had not been performed. RESULTS: 145 patients underwent attempted placement of a FRED device, and one or more devices were placed in all 145 patients. 135/145 (93%) had a single device placed. Core laboratory adjudication deemed 106 (73.1%) of the aneurysms large or giant. A safety endpoint was experienced by 9/145 (6.2%) patients, successfully achieving the safety PG of <15%. The effectiveness PG of >46% aneurysm occlusion was also achieved, with the effectiveness endpoint being met in 80/139 (57.6%) CONCLUSION: As compared with historically derived performance benchmarks, the FRED flow diverter is both safe and effective for the treatment of appropriately selected intracranial aneurysms. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01801007 BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9120407/ /pubmed/34282038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017469 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Hemorrhagic Stroke McDougall, Cameron G Diaz, Orlando Boulos, Alan Siddiqui, Adnan H Caplan, Justin Fifi, Johanna T Turk, Aquilla S Kayan, Yasha Jabbour, Pascal Kim, Louis J Hetts, Steven W Cooke, Daniel L Dowd, Christopher F Safety and efficacy results of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) stent system in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: US pivotal trial |
title | Safety and efficacy results of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) stent system in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: US pivotal trial |
title_full | Safety and efficacy results of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) stent system in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: US pivotal trial |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy results of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) stent system in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: US pivotal trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy results of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) stent system in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: US pivotal trial |
title_short | Safety and efficacy results of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) stent system in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: US pivotal trial |
title_sort | safety and efficacy results of the flow redirection endoluminal device (fred) stent system in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: us pivotal trial |
topic | Hemorrhagic Stroke |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34282038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017469 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcdougallcamerong safetyandefficacyresultsoftheflowredirectionendoluminaldevicefredstentsysteminthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysmsuspivotaltrial AT diazorlando safetyandefficacyresultsoftheflowredirectionendoluminaldevicefredstentsysteminthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysmsuspivotaltrial AT boulosalan safetyandefficacyresultsoftheflowredirectionendoluminaldevicefredstentsysteminthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysmsuspivotaltrial AT siddiquiadnanh safetyandefficacyresultsoftheflowredirectionendoluminaldevicefredstentsysteminthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysmsuspivotaltrial AT caplanjustin safetyandefficacyresultsoftheflowredirectionendoluminaldevicefredstentsysteminthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysmsuspivotaltrial AT fifijohannat safetyandefficacyresultsoftheflowredirectionendoluminaldevicefredstentsysteminthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysmsuspivotaltrial AT turkaquillas safetyandefficacyresultsoftheflowredirectionendoluminaldevicefredstentsysteminthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysmsuspivotaltrial AT kayanyasha safetyandefficacyresultsoftheflowredirectionendoluminaldevicefredstentsysteminthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysmsuspivotaltrial AT jabbourpascal safetyandefficacyresultsoftheflowredirectionendoluminaldevicefredstentsysteminthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysmsuspivotaltrial AT kimlouisj safetyandefficacyresultsoftheflowredirectionendoluminaldevicefredstentsysteminthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysmsuspivotaltrial AT hettsstevenw safetyandefficacyresultsoftheflowredirectionendoluminaldevicefredstentsysteminthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysmsuspivotaltrial AT cookedaniell safetyandefficacyresultsoftheflowredirectionendoluminaldevicefredstentsysteminthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysmsuspivotaltrial AT dowdchristopherf safetyandefficacyresultsoftheflowredirectionendoluminaldevicefredstentsysteminthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysmsuspivotaltrial |