Cargando…

Machine Learning for Prediction of Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock

OBJECTIVE: The management of cardiogenic shock (CS) in the elderly remains a major clinical challenge. Existing clinical prediction models have not performed well in assessing the prognosis of elderly patients with CS. This study aims to build a predictive model, which could better predict the 30-da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rong, Fangning, Xiang, Huaqiang, Qian, Lu, Xue, Yangjing, Ji, Kangting, Yin, Ripen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35600489
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.849688
_version_ 1784710967340302336
author Rong, Fangning
Xiang, Huaqiang
Qian, Lu
Xue, Yangjing
Ji, Kangting
Yin, Ripen
author_facet Rong, Fangning
Xiang, Huaqiang
Qian, Lu
Xue, Yangjing
Ji, Kangting
Yin, Ripen
author_sort Rong, Fangning
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The management of cardiogenic shock (CS) in the elderly remains a major clinical challenge. Existing clinical prediction models have not performed well in assessing the prognosis of elderly patients with CS. This study aims to build a predictive model, which could better predict the 30-day mortality of elderly patients with CS. METHODS: We extracted data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III version 1.4 (MIMIC-III) as the training set and the data of validation sets were collected from the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Three models, including the cox regression model, the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression model, and the CoxBoost model, were established using the training set. Through the comparison of area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), C index, net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and median improvement in risk score, the best model was selected. Then for external validation, compared the best model with the simplified acute physiology score II (SAPSII) and the CardShock risk score. RESULTS: A total of 919 patients were included in the study, of which 804 patients were in the training set and 115 patients were in the verification set. Using the training set, we built three models: the cox regression model including 6 predictors, the LASSO regression model including 4 predictors, and the CoxBoost model including 16 predictors. Among them, the CoxBoost model had good discrimination [AUC: 0.730; C index: 0.6958 (0.6657, 0.7259)]. Compared with the CoxBoost model, the NRI, IDI, and median improvement in risk score of other models were all<0. In the validation set, the CoxBoost model was also well-discriminated [AUC: 0.770; C index: 0.7713 (0.6751, 0.8675)]. Compared with the CoxBoost model, the NRI, IDI, and median improvement in risk score of SAPS II and the CardShock risk score were all < 0. And we constructed a dynamic nomogram to visually display the model. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study showed that in predicting the 30-day mortality of elderly CS patients, the CoxBoost model was superior to the Cox regression model, LASSO regression model, SAPS II, and the CardShock risk score.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9120613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91206132022-05-21 Machine Learning for Prediction of Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock Rong, Fangning Xiang, Huaqiang Qian, Lu Xue, Yangjing Ji, Kangting Yin, Ripen Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: The management of cardiogenic shock (CS) in the elderly remains a major clinical challenge. Existing clinical prediction models have not performed well in assessing the prognosis of elderly patients with CS. This study aims to build a predictive model, which could better predict the 30-day mortality of elderly patients with CS. METHODS: We extracted data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III version 1.4 (MIMIC-III) as the training set and the data of validation sets were collected from the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Three models, including the cox regression model, the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression model, and the CoxBoost model, were established using the training set. Through the comparison of area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), C index, net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and median improvement in risk score, the best model was selected. Then for external validation, compared the best model with the simplified acute physiology score II (SAPSII) and the CardShock risk score. RESULTS: A total of 919 patients were included in the study, of which 804 patients were in the training set and 115 patients were in the verification set. Using the training set, we built three models: the cox regression model including 6 predictors, the LASSO regression model including 4 predictors, and the CoxBoost model including 16 predictors. Among them, the CoxBoost model had good discrimination [AUC: 0.730; C index: 0.6958 (0.6657, 0.7259)]. Compared with the CoxBoost model, the NRI, IDI, and median improvement in risk score of other models were all<0. In the validation set, the CoxBoost model was also well-discriminated [AUC: 0.770; C index: 0.7713 (0.6751, 0.8675)]. Compared with the CoxBoost model, the NRI, IDI, and median improvement in risk score of SAPS II and the CardShock risk score were all < 0. And we constructed a dynamic nomogram to visually display the model. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study showed that in predicting the 30-day mortality of elderly CS patients, the CoxBoost model was superior to the Cox regression model, LASSO regression model, SAPS II, and the CardShock risk score. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9120613/ /pubmed/35600489 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.849688 Text en Copyright © 2022 Rong, Xiang, Qian, Xue, Ji and Yin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Rong, Fangning
Xiang, Huaqiang
Qian, Lu
Xue, Yangjing
Ji, Kangting
Yin, Ripen
Machine Learning for Prediction of Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock
title Machine Learning for Prediction of Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock
title_full Machine Learning for Prediction of Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock
title_fullStr Machine Learning for Prediction of Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning for Prediction of Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock
title_short Machine Learning for Prediction of Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock
title_sort machine learning for prediction of outcomes in cardiogenic shock
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35600489
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.849688
work_keys_str_mv AT rongfangning machinelearningforpredictionofoutcomesincardiogenicshock
AT xianghuaqiang machinelearningforpredictionofoutcomesincardiogenicshock
AT qianlu machinelearningforpredictionofoutcomesincardiogenicshock
AT xueyangjing machinelearningforpredictionofoutcomesincardiogenicshock
AT jikangting machinelearningforpredictionofoutcomesincardiogenicshock
AT yinripen machinelearningforpredictionofoutcomesincardiogenicshock