Cargando…

Presurgical cognitive status in patients with low‐grade glioma and epilepsy: Testing the effects of seizures, antiseizure medications, and tumor localization

BACKGROUND: Low‐grade gliomas (LGGs) are frequently associated with epilepsy. There are few studies addressing the impact of seizures, antiseizure medications (ASMs), and lesion localization on presurgery cognitive functioning. METHODS: We tested the relation between the above‐mentioned variables in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guarracino, Ilaria, Pauletto, Giada, Ius, Tamara, Palese, Francesca, Skrap, Miran, Tomasino, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35377547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2560
_version_ 1784710996378517504
author Guarracino, Ilaria
Pauletto, Giada
Ius, Tamara
Palese, Francesca
Skrap, Miran
Tomasino, Barbara
author_facet Guarracino, Ilaria
Pauletto, Giada
Ius, Tamara
Palese, Francesca
Skrap, Miran
Tomasino, Barbara
author_sort Guarracino, Ilaria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low‐grade gliomas (LGGs) are frequently associated with epilepsy. There are few studies addressing the impact of seizures, antiseizure medications (ASMs), and lesion localization on presurgery cognitive functioning. METHODS: We tested the relation between the above‐mentioned variables in a continuous series of 73 young patients (mean age 38.3 years ± 11.7) affected by LGGs and epilepsy. The anatomical areas, involved in this sample, were the left insula with surrounding cortical and subcortical areas, the right precentral gyrus/rolandic operculum, and the white matter and cortical regions beneath. RESULTS: Patients’ presurgery cognitive status was within the normal range, with borderline performance for some tasks. We tested whether lower scores were related with lesion or with epilepsy‐related factors. Multiple regression identified variables that predict test scores. The Token test score was predicted by a model (p = .0078) containing the DT2T1 MRI, corrected for seizure features. Object naming performance was predicted by a model (p = .0113) containing the localization, the DT2T1 MRI, corrected for sex, EEG, and onset. Verbal fluency score was predicted by a model (p = .0056) containing the localization and the DT2T1 MRI, corrected for AEDs and EEG. Working memory score was predicted by a model (p = .0117) containing Engel class, the DT2T1 MRI, corrected for sex. Clock drawing score was predicted by a model (p < .0001) containing the Engel class, AEDs, and EEG. TMT A score was predicted by a model (p = .0022) containing localization, corrected for EEG. TMT B‐A score was predicted by a model (p = .0373) containing localization. Voxel Lesion Symptom Mapping analyses carried out on patients’ lesion volumes confirmed that patients’ level of performance correlated with lesion‐related variables. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study indicates that the presurgical level of performance for language tasks and for cognitive flexibility and shifting is mainly predicted by lesion‐related variables, working memory by both lesion and epilepsy‐related variables. Epilepsy clinical and instrumental characteristics predicted performance for visuospatial planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9120733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91207332022-05-21 Presurgical cognitive status in patients with low‐grade glioma and epilepsy: Testing the effects of seizures, antiseizure medications, and tumor localization Guarracino, Ilaria Pauletto, Giada Ius, Tamara Palese, Francesca Skrap, Miran Tomasino, Barbara Brain Behav Original Articles BACKGROUND: Low‐grade gliomas (LGGs) are frequently associated with epilepsy. There are few studies addressing the impact of seizures, antiseizure medications (ASMs), and lesion localization on presurgery cognitive functioning. METHODS: We tested the relation between the above‐mentioned variables in a continuous series of 73 young patients (mean age 38.3 years ± 11.7) affected by LGGs and epilepsy. The anatomical areas, involved in this sample, were the left insula with surrounding cortical and subcortical areas, the right precentral gyrus/rolandic operculum, and the white matter and cortical regions beneath. RESULTS: Patients’ presurgery cognitive status was within the normal range, with borderline performance for some tasks. We tested whether lower scores were related with lesion or with epilepsy‐related factors. Multiple regression identified variables that predict test scores. The Token test score was predicted by a model (p = .0078) containing the DT2T1 MRI, corrected for seizure features. Object naming performance was predicted by a model (p = .0113) containing the localization, the DT2T1 MRI, corrected for sex, EEG, and onset. Verbal fluency score was predicted by a model (p = .0056) containing the localization and the DT2T1 MRI, corrected for AEDs and EEG. Working memory score was predicted by a model (p = .0117) containing Engel class, the DT2T1 MRI, corrected for sex. Clock drawing score was predicted by a model (p < .0001) containing the Engel class, AEDs, and EEG. TMT A score was predicted by a model (p = .0022) containing localization, corrected for EEG. TMT B‐A score was predicted by a model (p = .0373) containing localization. Voxel Lesion Symptom Mapping analyses carried out on patients’ lesion volumes confirmed that patients’ level of performance correlated with lesion‐related variables. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study indicates that the presurgical level of performance for language tasks and for cognitive flexibility and shifting is mainly predicted by lesion‐related variables, working memory by both lesion and epilepsy‐related variables. Epilepsy clinical and instrumental characteristics predicted performance for visuospatial planning. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9120733/ /pubmed/35377547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2560 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Guarracino, Ilaria
Pauletto, Giada
Ius, Tamara
Palese, Francesca
Skrap, Miran
Tomasino, Barbara
Presurgical cognitive status in patients with low‐grade glioma and epilepsy: Testing the effects of seizures, antiseizure medications, and tumor localization
title Presurgical cognitive status in patients with low‐grade glioma and epilepsy: Testing the effects of seizures, antiseizure medications, and tumor localization
title_full Presurgical cognitive status in patients with low‐grade glioma and epilepsy: Testing the effects of seizures, antiseizure medications, and tumor localization
title_fullStr Presurgical cognitive status in patients with low‐grade glioma and epilepsy: Testing the effects of seizures, antiseizure medications, and tumor localization
title_full_unstemmed Presurgical cognitive status in patients with low‐grade glioma and epilepsy: Testing the effects of seizures, antiseizure medications, and tumor localization
title_short Presurgical cognitive status in patients with low‐grade glioma and epilepsy: Testing the effects of seizures, antiseizure medications, and tumor localization
title_sort presurgical cognitive status in patients with low‐grade glioma and epilepsy: testing the effects of seizures, antiseizure medications, and tumor localization
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35377547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2560
work_keys_str_mv AT guarracinoilaria presurgicalcognitivestatusinpatientswithlowgradegliomaandepilepsytestingtheeffectsofseizuresantiseizuremedicationsandtumorlocalization
AT paulettogiada presurgicalcognitivestatusinpatientswithlowgradegliomaandepilepsytestingtheeffectsofseizuresantiseizuremedicationsandtumorlocalization
AT iustamara presurgicalcognitivestatusinpatientswithlowgradegliomaandepilepsytestingtheeffectsofseizuresantiseizuremedicationsandtumorlocalization
AT palesefrancesca presurgicalcognitivestatusinpatientswithlowgradegliomaandepilepsytestingtheeffectsofseizuresantiseizuremedicationsandtumorlocalization
AT skrapmiran presurgicalcognitivestatusinpatientswithlowgradegliomaandepilepsytestingtheeffectsofseizuresantiseizuremedicationsandtumorlocalization
AT tomasinobarbara presurgicalcognitivestatusinpatientswithlowgradegliomaandepilepsytestingtheeffectsofseizuresantiseizuremedicationsandtumorlocalization