Cargando…

Office-Based Open Trigger Finger Release Has a Low Complication Rate

PURPOSE: Open trigger finger release is generally performed in the operating room in an outpatient setting. Its complication rate widely varies between 1% and 43%. Our goal was to determine whether performing this surgery in the clinic is a safe and viable alternative to performing this surgery in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kardestuncer, Mitra, Kardestuncer, Tarik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.01.008
_version_ 1784711001881444352
author Kardestuncer, Mitra
Kardestuncer, Tarik
author_facet Kardestuncer, Mitra
Kardestuncer, Tarik
author_sort Kardestuncer, Mitra
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Open trigger finger release is generally performed in the operating room in an outpatient setting. Its complication rate widely varies between 1% and 43%. Our goal was to determine whether performing this surgery in the clinic is a safe and viable alternative to performing this surgery in the operating room. METHODS: All open trigger finger releases performed at our clinic between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Each surgery was performed by the same fellowship-trained hand surgeon using a standard open technique with an Esmarch tourniquet and without the use of epinephrine. Five hundred twenty seven finger releases were performed in 514 patients. Complications were defined as signs or symptoms requiring further treatment. RESULTS: There were 33 documented complications in the 527 fingers (6.3%). The most common complications were minor wound complications, including 17 (3.2%) with localized cellulitis, 2 (0.4%) with a superficial infection, 4 (0.8%) with stitch abscesses, and 5 (0.9%) with wound dehiscence. All minor complications resolved quickly with oral antibiotics and supportive care. Five patients (0.9%) required further operative management. Of these 5, 2 (0.4%) had a deep infection, 1 had chronic dehiscence, and 2 (0.4%) required flexor tenosynovectomy for persistent pain and stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo open trigger finger release surgery in the clinic have complication rates similar to reported complication rates of surgery performed in the operating room. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Performing open trigger finger surgery in the office is safe. We continue to perform this surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, when access to operating rooms and personal protective equipment is limited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9120756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91207562022-05-21 Office-Based Open Trigger Finger Release Has a Low Complication Rate Kardestuncer, Mitra Kardestuncer, Tarik J Hand Surg Glob Online Original Research PURPOSE: Open trigger finger release is generally performed in the operating room in an outpatient setting. Its complication rate widely varies between 1% and 43%. Our goal was to determine whether performing this surgery in the clinic is a safe and viable alternative to performing this surgery in the operating room. METHODS: All open trigger finger releases performed at our clinic between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Each surgery was performed by the same fellowship-trained hand surgeon using a standard open technique with an Esmarch tourniquet and without the use of epinephrine. Five hundred twenty seven finger releases were performed in 514 patients. Complications were defined as signs or symptoms requiring further treatment. RESULTS: There were 33 documented complications in the 527 fingers (6.3%). The most common complications were minor wound complications, including 17 (3.2%) with localized cellulitis, 2 (0.4%) with a superficial infection, 4 (0.8%) with stitch abscesses, and 5 (0.9%) with wound dehiscence. All minor complications resolved quickly with oral antibiotics and supportive care. Five patients (0.9%) required further operative management. Of these 5, 2 (0.4%) had a deep infection, 1 had chronic dehiscence, and 2 (0.4%) required flexor tenosynovectomy for persistent pain and stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo open trigger finger release surgery in the clinic have complication rates similar to reported complication rates of surgery performed in the operating room. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Performing open trigger finger surgery in the office is safe. We continue to perform this surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, when access to operating rooms and personal protective equipment is limited. Elsevier 2022-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9120756/ /pubmed/35601519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.01.008 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Kardestuncer, Mitra
Kardestuncer, Tarik
Office-Based Open Trigger Finger Release Has a Low Complication Rate
title Office-Based Open Trigger Finger Release Has a Low Complication Rate
title_full Office-Based Open Trigger Finger Release Has a Low Complication Rate
title_fullStr Office-Based Open Trigger Finger Release Has a Low Complication Rate
title_full_unstemmed Office-Based Open Trigger Finger Release Has a Low Complication Rate
title_short Office-Based Open Trigger Finger Release Has a Low Complication Rate
title_sort office-based open trigger finger release has a low complication rate
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.01.008
work_keys_str_mv AT kardestuncermitra officebasedopentriggerfingerreleasehasalowcomplicationrate
AT kardestuncertarik officebasedopentriggerfingerreleasehasalowcomplicationrate