Cargando…

Comparison of drone and vessel-based collection of microbiological water samples in marine environments

Many water quality metrics cannot be measured in situ and require collection of a physical sample for laboratory analysis. This includes microbiological samples for detection of fecal coliform bacteria in marine and freshwater systems which are a critical component of food safety programs for human...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horricks, Ryan A., Bannister, Cody, Lewis-McCrea, Leah M., Hicks, James, Watson, Kiersten, Reid, Gregor K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35593922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10095-8
_version_ 1784711012332601344
author Horricks, Ryan A.
Bannister, Cody
Lewis-McCrea, Leah M.
Hicks, James
Watson, Kiersten
Reid, Gregor K.
author_facet Horricks, Ryan A.
Bannister, Cody
Lewis-McCrea, Leah M.
Hicks, James
Watson, Kiersten
Reid, Gregor K.
author_sort Horricks, Ryan A.
collection PubMed
description Many water quality metrics cannot be measured in situ and require collection of a physical sample for laboratory analysis. This includes microbiological samples for detection of fecal coliform bacteria in marine and freshwater systems which are a critical component of food safety programs for human consumption of bivalve shellfish worldwide. Water sample collection programs are typically vessel-based which can be time and resource intensive. In Canada, the Canadian Shellfish Sanitation Program aims to avoid consumption of contaminated molluscan bivalves by monitoring fecal coliform bacteria through vessel-based water sample collection. Uncrewed aerial vehicles or drones are becoming more commonly used for water sample collection given their relatively low cost but are rarely used to support microbiological analyses. A prerequisite for the acceptance of a new collection method for a regulatory program is to determine if the method of sample collection affects results. To assess this potential, we designed, developed, and tested a sampling device attached to the underside of a drone to collect water samples for bacteriological analysis. Drone and vessel-based samples were collected in the same location, at the same 20-cm depth, within a minute apart, at ten different geographic locations in coastal Nova Scotia waters to compare fecal coliform counts. Bacterial count estimates obtained from drone-collected samples were not significantly different than estimates obtained from vessel-collected samples (p < 0.5). Results from this study suggest novel water sampling techniques using drones could supplement or replace traditional vessel-based sampling methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9120801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91208012022-05-20 Comparison of drone and vessel-based collection of microbiological water samples in marine environments Horricks, Ryan A. Bannister, Cody Lewis-McCrea, Leah M. Hicks, James Watson, Kiersten Reid, Gregor K. Environ Monit Assess Article Many water quality metrics cannot be measured in situ and require collection of a physical sample for laboratory analysis. This includes microbiological samples for detection of fecal coliform bacteria in marine and freshwater systems which are a critical component of food safety programs for human consumption of bivalve shellfish worldwide. Water sample collection programs are typically vessel-based which can be time and resource intensive. In Canada, the Canadian Shellfish Sanitation Program aims to avoid consumption of contaminated molluscan bivalves by monitoring fecal coliform bacteria through vessel-based water sample collection. Uncrewed aerial vehicles or drones are becoming more commonly used for water sample collection given their relatively low cost but are rarely used to support microbiological analyses. A prerequisite for the acceptance of a new collection method for a regulatory program is to determine if the method of sample collection affects results. To assess this potential, we designed, developed, and tested a sampling device attached to the underside of a drone to collect water samples for bacteriological analysis. Drone and vessel-based samples were collected in the same location, at the same 20-cm depth, within a minute apart, at ten different geographic locations in coastal Nova Scotia waters to compare fecal coliform counts. Bacterial count estimates obtained from drone-collected samples were not significantly different than estimates obtained from vessel-collected samples (p < 0.5). Results from this study suggest novel water sampling techniques using drones could supplement or replace traditional vessel-based sampling methods. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9120801/ /pubmed/35593922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10095-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Horricks, Ryan A.
Bannister, Cody
Lewis-McCrea, Leah M.
Hicks, James
Watson, Kiersten
Reid, Gregor K.
Comparison of drone and vessel-based collection of microbiological water samples in marine environments
title Comparison of drone and vessel-based collection of microbiological water samples in marine environments
title_full Comparison of drone and vessel-based collection of microbiological water samples in marine environments
title_fullStr Comparison of drone and vessel-based collection of microbiological water samples in marine environments
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of drone and vessel-based collection of microbiological water samples in marine environments
title_short Comparison of drone and vessel-based collection of microbiological water samples in marine environments
title_sort comparison of drone and vessel-based collection of microbiological water samples in marine environments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35593922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10095-8
work_keys_str_mv AT horricksryana comparisonofdroneandvesselbasedcollectionofmicrobiologicalwatersamplesinmarineenvironments
AT bannistercody comparisonofdroneandvesselbasedcollectionofmicrobiologicalwatersamplesinmarineenvironments
AT lewismccrealeahm comparisonofdroneandvesselbasedcollectionofmicrobiologicalwatersamplesinmarineenvironments
AT hicksjames comparisonofdroneandvesselbasedcollectionofmicrobiologicalwatersamplesinmarineenvironments
AT watsonkiersten comparisonofdroneandvesselbasedcollectionofmicrobiologicalwatersamplesinmarineenvironments
AT reidgregork comparisonofdroneandvesselbasedcollectionofmicrobiologicalwatersamplesinmarineenvironments