Cargando…
Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Uterine cervical neoplasms is widely concerned due to its high incidence rate. Early diagnosis is extremely important for prognosis. The purpose of this article is evaluating the efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of suspected uterine cervical neoplasms. METHODS: We searched...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.828346 |
_version_ | 1784711044657053696 |
---|---|
author | Shen, Zhuo-Wei Zhang, Li-Jie Shen, Zhuo-Yi Zhang, Zhi-Feng Xu, Fan Zhang, Xiao Li, Rui Xiao, Zhen |
author_facet | Shen, Zhuo-Wei Zhang, Li-Jie Shen, Zhuo-Yi Zhang, Zhi-Feng Xu, Fan Zhang, Xiao Li, Rui Xiao, Zhen |
author_sort | Shen, Zhuo-Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Uterine cervical neoplasms is widely concerned due to its high incidence rate. Early diagnosis is extremely important for prognosis. The purpose of this article is evaluating the efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of suspected uterine cervical neoplasms. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of science up to September 1, 2021. By analyzing the true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN) and false negative (FN) of six included study, we evaluated the pooled and grouping sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), based on random effects models. The overall diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectrum was evaluated by SROC curve analysis and AUC. RESULTS: After screening with inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of six study were included in the study. The pooled sensitivity and specificity was 0.98 (95% Cl, 0.93–0.99) and 0.95 (95% Cl, 0.89–0.98). The total PLR and NLR were 21.05 (95% CI, 8.23–53.86) and 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01–0.07), respectively. And the AUC of the SROC curve which show the overall diagnostic accuracy was 0.99 (0.98–1.00). CONCLUSION: Through analysis, we confirmed the role of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in the diagnosis of suspected uterine cervical tumors. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021284966]. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9120934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91209342022-05-21 Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis Shen, Zhuo-Wei Zhang, Li-Jie Shen, Zhuo-Yi Zhang, Zhi-Feng Xu, Fan Zhang, Xiao Li, Rui Xiao, Zhen Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Uterine cervical neoplasms is widely concerned due to its high incidence rate. Early diagnosis is extremely important for prognosis. The purpose of this article is evaluating the efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of suspected uterine cervical neoplasms. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of science up to September 1, 2021. By analyzing the true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN) and false negative (FN) of six included study, we evaluated the pooled and grouping sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), based on random effects models. The overall diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectrum was evaluated by SROC curve analysis and AUC. RESULTS: After screening with inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of six study were included in the study. The pooled sensitivity and specificity was 0.98 (95% Cl, 0.93–0.99) and 0.95 (95% Cl, 0.89–0.98). The total PLR and NLR were 21.05 (95% CI, 8.23–53.86) and 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01–0.07), respectively. And the AUC of the SROC curve which show the overall diagnostic accuracy was 0.99 (0.98–1.00). CONCLUSION: Through analysis, we confirmed the role of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in the diagnosis of suspected uterine cervical tumors. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021284966]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9120934/ /pubmed/35602511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.828346 Text en Copyright © 2022 Shen, Zhang, Shen, Zhang, Xu, Zhang, Li and Xiao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Shen, Zhuo-Wei Zhang, Li-Jie Shen, Zhuo-Yi Zhang, Zhi-Feng Xu, Fan Zhang, Xiao Li, Rui Xiao, Zhen Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of uterine cervical neoplasms: a meta-analysis |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.828346 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shenzhuowei efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis AT zhanglijie efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis AT shenzhuoyi efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis AT zhangzhifeng efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis AT xufan efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis AT zhangxiao efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis AT lirui efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis AT xiaozhen efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis |