Cargando…

Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Uterine cervical neoplasms is widely concerned due to its high incidence rate. Early diagnosis is extremely important for prognosis. The purpose of this article is evaluating the efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of suspected uterine cervical neoplasms. METHODS: We searched...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Zhuo-Wei, Zhang, Li-Jie, Shen, Zhuo-Yi, Zhang, Zhi-Feng, Xu, Fan, Zhang, Xiao, Li, Rui, Xiao, Zhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602511
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.828346
_version_ 1784711044657053696
author Shen, Zhuo-Wei
Zhang, Li-Jie
Shen, Zhuo-Yi
Zhang, Zhi-Feng
Xu, Fan
Zhang, Xiao
Li, Rui
Xiao, Zhen
author_facet Shen, Zhuo-Wei
Zhang, Li-Jie
Shen, Zhuo-Yi
Zhang, Zhi-Feng
Xu, Fan
Zhang, Xiao
Li, Rui
Xiao, Zhen
author_sort Shen, Zhuo-Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Uterine cervical neoplasms is widely concerned due to its high incidence rate. Early diagnosis is extremely important for prognosis. The purpose of this article is evaluating the efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of suspected uterine cervical neoplasms. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of science up to September 1, 2021. By analyzing the true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN) and false negative (FN) of six included study, we evaluated the pooled and grouping sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), based on random effects models. The overall diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectrum was evaluated by SROC curve analysis and AUC. RESULTS: After screening with inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of six study were included in the study. The pooled sensitivity and specificity was 0.98 (95% Cl, 0.93–0.99) and 0.95 (95% Cl, 0.89–0.98). The total PLR and NLR were 21.05 (95% CI, 8.23–53.86) and 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01–0.07), respectively. And the AUC of the SROC curve which show the overall diagnostic accuracy was 0.99 (0.98–1.00). CONCLUSION: Through analysis, we confirmed the role of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in the diagnosis of suspected uterine cervical tumors. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021284966].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9120934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91209342022-05-21 Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis Shen, Zhuo-Wei Zhang, Li-Jie Shen, Zhuo-Yi Zhang, Zhi-Feng Xu, Fan Zhang, Xiao Li, Rui Xiao, Zhen Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Uterine cervical neoplasms is widely concerned due to its high incidence rate. Early diagnosis is extremely important for prognosis. The purpose of this article is evaluating the efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of suspected uterine cervical neoplasms. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of science up to September 1, 2021. By analyzing the true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN) and false negative (FN) of six included study, we evaluated the pooled and grouping sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), based on random effects models. The overall diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectrum was evaluated by SROC curve analysis and AUC. RESULTS: After screening with inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of six study were included in the study. The pooled sensitivity and specificity was 0.98 (95% Cl, 0.93–0.99) and 0.95 (95% Cl, 0.89–0.98). The total PLR and NLR were 21.05 (95% CI, 8.23–53.86) and 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01–0.07), respectively. And the AUC of the SROC curve which show the overall diagnostic accuracy was 0.99 (0.98–1.00). CONCLUSION: Through analysis, we confirmed the role of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in the diagnosis of suspected uterine cervical tumors. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021284966]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9120934/ /pubmed/35602511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.828346 Text en Copyright © 2022 Shen, Zhang, Shen, Zhang, Xu, Zhang, Li and Xiao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Shen, Zhuo-Wei
Zhang, Li-Jie
Shen, Zhuo-Yi
Zhang, Zhi-Feng
Xu, Fan
Zhang, Xiao
Li, Rui
Xiao, Zhen
Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy of raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of uterine cervical neoplasms: a meta-analysis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9120934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602511
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.828346
work_keys_str_mv AT shenzhuowei efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis
AT zhanglijie efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis
AT shenzhuoyi efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis
AT zhangzhifeng efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis
AT xufan efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis
AT zhangxiao efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis
AT lirui efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis
AT xiaozhen efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofuterinecervicalneoplasmsametaanalysis