Cargando…

Implementing corrections of isocentric shifts for the stereotactic irradiation of cerebral targets: Clinical validation

Purpose: Any Linac will show geometric imprecisions, including non‐ideal alignment of the gantry, collimator and couch axes, and gantry sag or wobble. Their angular dependence can be quantified and resulting changes of the dose distribution predicted (Wack, JACMP 20(5), 2020). We analyzed whether it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wegener, Sonja, Schindhelm, Robert, Sauer, Otto A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35234345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13577
_version_ 1784711067703705600
author Wegener, Sonja
Schindhelm, Robert
Sauer, Otto A.
author_facet Wegener, Sonja
Schindhelm, Robert
Sauer, Otto A.
author_sort Wegener, Sonja
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Any Linac will show geometric imprecisions, including non‐ideal alignment of the gantry, collimator and couch axes, and gantry sag or wobble. Their angular dependence can be quantified and resulting changes of the dose distribution predicted (Wack, JACMP 20(5), 2020). We analyzed whether it is feasible to correct geometric shifts during treatment planning. The successful implementation of such a correction procedure was verified by measurements of different stereotactic treatment plans. Methods: Isocentric shifts were quantified for two Elekta Synergy Agility Linacs using the QualiForMed ISO‐CBCT+ module, yielding the shift between kV and MV isocenters, the gantry flex and wobble as well as the positions of couch and collimator rotation axes. Next, the position of each field's isocenter in the Pinnacle treatment planning system was adjusted accordingly using a script. Fifteen stereotactic treatment plans of cerebral metastases (0.34 to 26.53 cm(3)) comprising 9–11 beams were investigated; 54 gantry and couch combinations in total. Unmodified plans and corrected plans were measured using the Sun Nuclear SRS‐MapCHECK with the Stereophan phantom and evaluated using gamma analysis. Results: Geometric imprecisions, such as shifts of up to 0.8 mm between kV and MV isocenter, a couch rotation axis 0.9 mm off the kV isocente,r and gantry flex with an amplitude of 1.1 mm, were found. For eight, mostly small PTVs D98 values declined more than 5% by simulating these shifts. The average gamma (2%/2 mm, absolute, global, 20% threshold) was reduced from 0.53 to 0.31 (0.32 to 0.30) for Linac 1 (Linac 2) when including the isocentric corrections. Thus, Linac 1 reached the accuracy level of Linac 2 after correction. Conclusion: Correcting for Linac geometric deviations during the planning process is feasible and was dosimetrically validated. The dosimetric impact of the geometric imperfections can vary between Linacs and should be assessed and corrected where necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9121032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91210322022-05-21 Implementing corrections of isocentric shifts for the stereotactic irradiation of cerebral targets: Clinical validation Wegener, Sonja Schindhelm, Robert Sauer, Otto A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Purpose: Any Linac will show geometric imprecisions, including non‐ideal alignment of the gantry, collimator and couch axes, and gantry sag or wobble. Their angular dependence can be quantified and resulting changes of the dose distribution predicted (Wack, JACMP 20(5), 2020). We analyzed whether it is feasible to correct geometric shifts during treatment planning. The successful implementation of such a correction procedure was verified by measurements of different stereotactic treatment plans. Methods: Isocentric shifts were quantified for two Elekta Synergy Agility Linacs using the QualiForMed ISO‐CBCT+ module, yielding the shift between kV and MV isocenters, the gantry flex and wobble as well as the positions of couch and collimator rotation axes. Next, the position of each field's isocenter in the Pinnacle treatment planning system was adjusted accordingly using a script. Fifteen stereotactic treatment plans of cerebral metastases (0.34 to 26.53 cm(3)) comprising 9–11 beams were investigated; 54 gantry and couch combinations in total. Unmodified plans and corrected plans were measured using the Sun Nuclear SRS‐MapCHECK with the Stereophan phantom and evaluated using gamma analysis. Results: Geometric imprecisions, such as shifts of up to 0.8 mm between kV and MV isocenter, a couch rotation axis 0.9 mm off the kV isocente,r and gantry flex with an amplitude of 1.1 mm, were found. For eight, mostly small PTVs D98 values declined more than 5% by simulating these shifts. The average gamma (2%/2 mm, absolute, global, 20% threshold) was reduced from 0.53 to 0.31 (0.32 to 0.30) for Linac 1 (Linac 2) when including the isocentric corrections. Thus, Linac 1 reached the accuracy level of Linac 2 after correction. Conclusion: Correcting for Linac geometric deviations during the planning process is feasible and was dosimetrically validated. The dosimetric impact of the geometric imperfections can vary between Linacs and should be assessed and corrected where necessary. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9121032/ /pubmed/35234345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13577 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Wegener, Sonja
Schindhelm, Robert
Sauer, Otto A.
Implementing corrections of isocentric shifts for the stereotactic irradiation of cerebral targets: Clinical validation
title Implementing corrections of isocentric shifts for the stereotactic irradiation of cerebral targets: Clinical validation
title_full Implementing corrections of isocentric shifts for the stereotactic irradiation of cerebral targets: Clinical validation
title_fullStr Implementing corrections of isocentric shifts for the stereotactic irradiation of cerebral targets: Clinical validation
title_full_unstemmed Implementing corrections of isocentric shifts for the stereotactic irradiation of cerebral targets: Clinical validation
title_short Implementing corrections of isocentric shifts for the stereotactic irradiation of cerebral targets: Clinical validation
title_sort implementing corrections of isocentric shifts for the stereotactic irradiation of cerebral targets: clinical validation
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35234345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13577
work_keys_str_mv AT wegenersonja implementingcorrectionsofisocentricshiftsforthestereotacticirradiationofcerebraltargetsclinicalvalidation
AT schindhelmrobert implementingcorrectionsofisocentricshiftsforthestereotacticirradiationofcerebraltargetsclinicalvalidation
AT sauerottoa implementingcorrectionsofisocentricshiftsforthestereotacticirradiationofcerebraltargetsclinicalvalidation