Cargando…

Evaluating dosimetric accuracy of the 6 MV calibration on EBT3 film in the use of Ir‐192 high dose rate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric accuracy of EBT3 film calibrated with a 6 MV beam for high dose rate brachytherapy and propose a novel method for direct film calibration with an Ir‐192 source. METHODS: The 6 MV calibration was performed in water on a linear accelerator (linac). The Ir‐192 calibr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Lyu, Gaballa, Hani, Chang, Jenghwa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35226398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13571
_version_ 1784711069843849216
author Huang, Lyu
Gaballa, Hani
Chang, Jenghwa
author_facet Huang, Lyu
Gaballa, Hani
Chang, Jenghwa
author_sort Huang, Lyu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric accuracy of EBT3 film calibrated with a 6 MV beam for high dose rate brachytherapy and propose a novel method for direct film calibration with an Ir‐192 source. METHODS: The 6 MV calibration was performed in water on a linear accelerator (linac). The Ir‐192 calibration was accomplished by irradiating the film wrapped around a cylinder applicator with an Ir‐192 source. All films were scanned 1‐day post‐irradiation to acquire calibration curves for all three (red, blue, and green) channels. The Ir‐192 calibration films were also used for single‐dose comparison. Moreover, an independent test film under a H.A.M. applicator was irradiated and the 2D dose distribution was obtained separately for each calibration using the red channel data. Gamma analysis and point‐by‐point profile comparison were performed to evaluate the performance of both calibrations. The uncertainty budget for each calibration system was analyzed. RESULTS: The red channel had the best performance for both calibration systems in the single‐dose comparison. We found a significant 4.89% difference from the reference for doses <250 cGy using the 6 MV calibration, while the difference was only 0.87% for doses >600 cGy. Gamma analysis of the 2D dose distribution showed the Ir‐192 calibration had a higher passing rate of 91.9% for the 1 mm/2% criterion, compared to 83.5% for the 6 MV calibration. Most failing points were in the low‐dose region (<200 cGy). The point‐by‐point profile comparison reported a discrepancy of 2%–3.6% between the Ir‐192 and 6 MV calibrations in this low‐dose region. The linac‐ and Ir‐192‐based dosimetry systems had an uncertainty of 4.1% (k = 2) and 5.66% (k = 2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Direct calibration of EBT3 films with an Ir‐192 source is feasible and reliable, while the dosimetric accuracy of 6 MV calibration depends on the dose range. The Ir‐192 calibration should be used when the measurement dose range is below 250 cGy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9121041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91210412022-05-21 Evaluating dosimetric accuracy of the 6 MV calibration on EBT3 film in the use of Ir‐192 high dose rate brachytherapy Huang, Lyu Gaballa, Hani Chang, Jenghwa J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric accuracy of EBT3 film calibrated with a 6 MV beam for high dose rate brachytherapy and propose a novel method for direct film calibration with an Ir‐192 source. METHODS: The 6 MV calibration was performed in water on a linear accelerator (linac). The Ir‐192 calibration was accomplished by irradiating the film wrapped around a cylinder applicator with an Ir‐192 source. All films were scanned 1‐day post‐irradiation to acquire calibration curves for all three (red, blue, and green) channels. The Ir‐192 calibration films were also used for single‐dose comparison. Moreover, an independent test film under a H.A.M. applicator was irradiated and the 2D dose distribution was obtained separately for each calibration using the red channel data. Gamma analysis and point‐by‐point profile comparison were performed to evaluate the performance of both calibrations. The uncertainty budget for each calibration system was analyzed. RESULTS: The red channel had the best performance for both calibration systems in the single‐dose comparison. We found a significant 4.89% difference from the reference for doses <250 cGy using the 6 MV calibration, while the difference was only 0.87% for doses >600 cGy. Gamma analysis of the 2D dose distribution showed the Ir‐192 calibration had a higher passing rate of 91.9% for the 1 mm/2% criterion, compared to 83.5% for the 6 MV calibration. Most failing points were in the low‐dose region (<200 cGy). The point‐by‐point profile comparison reported a discrepancy of 2%–3.6% between the Ir‐192 and 6 MV calibrations in this low‐dose region. The linac‐ and Ir‐192‐based dosimetry systems had an uncertainty of 4.1% (k = 2) and 5.66% (k = 2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Direct calibration of EBT3 films with an Ir‐192 source is feasible and reliable, while the dosimetric accuracy of 6 MV calibration depends on the dose range. The Ir‐192 calibration should be used when the measurement dose range is below 250 cGy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9121041/ /pubmed/35226398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13571 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Huang, Lyu
Gaballa, Hani
Chang, Jenghwa
Evaluating dosimetric accuracy of the 6 MV calibration on EBT3 film in the use of Ir‐192 high dose rate brachytherapy
title Evaluating dosimetric accuracy of the 6 MV calibration on EBT3 film in the use of Ir‐192 high dose rate brachytherapy
title_full Evaluating dosimetric accuracy of the 6 MV calibration on EBT3 film in the use of Ir‐192 high dose rate brachytherapy
title_fullStr Evaluating dosimetric accuracy of the 6 MV calibration on EBT3 film in the use of Ir‐192 high dose rate brachytherapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating dosimetric accuracy of the 6 MV calibration on EBT3 film in the use of Ir‐192 high dose rate brachytherapy
title_short Evaluating dosimetric accuracy of the 6 MV calibration on EBT3 film in the use of Ir‐192 high dose rate brachytherapy
title_sort evaluating dosimetric accuracy of the 6 mv calibration on ebt3 film in the use of ir‐192 high dose rate brachytherapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35226398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13571
work_keys_str_mv AT huanglyu evaluatingdosimetricaccuracyofthe6mvcalibrationonebt3filmintheuseofir192highdoseratebrachytherapy
AT gaballahani evaluatingdosimetricaccuracyofthe6mvcalibrationonebt3filmintheuseofir192highdoseratebrachytherapy
AT changjenghwa evaluatingdosimetricaccuracyofthe6mvcalibrationonebt3filmintheuseofir192highdoseratebrachytherapy