Cargando…
Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery
PURPOSE: We compared the setup errors determined by an optical imaging system (OSIS) in women who received breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole‐breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with those from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) carried out routinely. METHODS: We compared 130 setup errors in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35293667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13578 |
_version_ | 1784711070608261120 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Ping Liu, Ziyi Jiang, Weijuan Qu, Ang Sun, Haitao Wang, Junjie |
author_facet | Jiang, Ping Liu, Ziyi Jiang, Weijuan Qu, Ang Sun, Haitao Wang, Junjie |
author_sort | Jiang, Ping |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We compared the setup errors determined by an optical imaging system (OSIS) in women who received breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole‐breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with those from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) carried out routinely. METHODS: We compared 130 setup errors in 10 patients undergoing WBRT following BCS by analyzing the translational and rotational couch shifts via CBCT and OSIS. Patients were treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The patient outline extracted from the planning reference Computed tomography (CT) was used as the reference for OSIS and CBCT alignment during treatment. We detected the setup uncertainty using CBCT and OSIS at the first five fractionations of RT and then twice a week. RESULTS: The absolute translational setup error (mean ± Standard deviation (SD)) in x (lateral), y (longitudinal), and z (vertical) axes detected by the OSIS was 0.14 ± 0.18, 0.15 ± 0.14, and 0.13 ± 0.13 cm, respectively. The rotational setup error (mean ± SD) in Rx (pitch), Ry (roll), and Rz (yaw) axes was 0.77 ± 0.54, 0.76 ± 0.61, and 1.23 ± 0.95, respectively. Significant difference is observed only in one direction (Rx, p = 0.03) in the paired setup errors obtaining from OSIS and CBCT, without significant differences in five directions. CONCLUSION: OSIS is a repeatable and reliable system that can be used to detect misalignments with accuracy, which is capable of supplementing CBCT for WBRT after BCS. We believe that an OSIS may be easier to use, quicker, and reduce overall dose as this method of patient alignment does not require ionizing radiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9121044 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91210442022-05-21 Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery Jiang, Ping Liu, Ziyi Jiang, Weijuan Qu, Ang Sun, Haitao Wang, Junjie J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: We compared the setup errors determined by an optical imaging system (OSIS) in women who received breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole‐breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with those from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) carried out routinely. METHODS: We compared 130 setup errors in 10 patients undergoing WBRT following BCS by analyzing the translational and rotational couch shifts via CBCT and OSIS. Patients were treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The patient outline extracted from the planning reference Computed tomography (CT) was used as the reference for OSIS and CBCT alignment during treatment. We detected the setup uncertainty using CBCT and OSIS at the first five fractionations of RT and then twice a week. RESULTS: The absolute translational setup error (mean ± Standard deviation (SD)) in x (lateral), y (longitudinal), and z (vertical) axes detected by the OSIS was 0.14 ± 0.18, 0.15 ± 0.14, and 0.13 ± 0.13 cm, respectively. The rotational setup error (mean ± SD) in Rx (pitch), Ry (roll), and Rz (yaw) axes was 0.77 ± 0.54, 0.76 ± 0.61, and 1.23 ± 0.95, respectively. Significant difference is observed only in one direction (Rx, p = 0.03) in the paired setup errors obtaining from OSIS and CBCT, without significant differences in five directions. CONCLUSION: OSIS is a repeatable and reliable system that can be used to detect misalignments with accuracy, which is capable of supplementing CBCT for WBRT after BCS. We believe that an OSIS may be easier to use, quicker, and reduce overall dose as this method of patient alignment does not require ionizing radiation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9121044/ /pubmed/35293667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13578 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Jiang, Ping Liu, Ziyi Jiang, Weijuan Qu, Ang Sun, Haitao Wang, Junjie Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery |
title | Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery |
title_full | Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery |
title_fullStr | Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery |
title_short | Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery |
title_sort | detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35293667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13578 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangping detectionofsetuperrorswithabodysurfacelaserscanningsystemforwholebreastirradiationafterbreastconservingsurgery AT liuziyi detectionofsetuperrorswithabodysurfacelaserscanningsystemforwholebreastirradiationafterbreastconservingsurgery AT jiangweijuan detectionofsetuperrorswithabodysurfacelaserscanningsystemforwholebreastirradiationafterbreastconservingsurgery AT quang detectionofsetuperrorswithabodysurfacelaserscanningsystemforwholebreastirradiationafterbreastconservingsurgery AT sunhaitao detectionofsetuperrorswithabodysurfacelaserscanningsystemforwholebreastirradiationafterbreastconservingsurgery AT wangjunjie detectionofsetuperrorswithabodysurfacelaserscanningsystemforwholebreastirradiationafterbreastconservingsurgery |