Cargando…

Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery

PURPOSE: We compared the setup errors determined by an optical imaging system (OSIS) in women who received breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole‐breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with those from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) carried out routinely. METHODS: We compared 130 setup errors in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Ping, Liu, Ziyi, Jiang, Weijuan, Qu, Ang, Sun, Haitao, Wang, Junjie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35293667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13578
_version_ 1784711070608261120
author Jiang, Ping
Liu, Ziyi
Jiang, Weijuan
Qu, Ang
Sun, Haitao
Wang, Junjie
author_facet Jiang, Ping
Liu, Ziyi
Jiang, Weijuan
Qu, Ang
Sun, Haitao
Wang, Junjie
author_sort Jiang, Ping
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We compared the setup errors determined by an optical imaging system (OSIS) in women who received breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole‐breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with those from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) carried out routinely. METHODS: We compared 130 setup errors in 10 patients undergoing WBRT following BCS by analyzing the translational and rotational couch shifts via CBCT and OSIS. Patients were treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The patient outline extracted from the planning reference Computed tomography (CT) was used as the reference for OSIS and CBCT alignment during treatment. We detected the setup uncertainty using CBCT and OSIS at the first five fractionations of RT and then twice a week. RESULTS: The absolute translational setup error (mean ± Standard deviation (SD)) in x (lateral), y (longitudinal), and z (vertical) axes detected by the OSIS was 0.14 ± 0.18, 0.15 ± 0.14, and 0.13 ± 0.13 cm, respectively. The rotational setup error (mean ± SD) in Rx (pitch), Ry (roll), and Rz (yaw) axes was 0.77 ± 0.54, 0.76 ± 0.61, and 1.23 ± 0.95, respectively. Significant difference is observed only in one direction (Rx, p = 0.03) in the paired setup errors obtaining from OSIS and CBCT, without significant differences in five directions. CONCLUSION: OSIS is a repeatable and reliable system that can be used to detect misalignments with accuracy, which is capable of supplementing CBCT for WBRT after BCS. We believe that an OSIS may be easier to use, quicker, and reduce overall dose as this method of patient alignment does not require ionizing radiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9121044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91210442022-05-21 Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery Jiang, Ping Liu, Ziyi Jiang, Weijuan Qu, Ang Sun, Haitao Wang, Junjie J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: We compared the setup errors determined by an optical imaging system (OSIS) in women who received breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole‐breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with those from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) carried out routinely. METHODS: We compared 130 setup errors in 10 patients undergoing WBRT following BCS by analyzing the translational and rotational couch shifts via CBCT and OSIS. Patients were treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The patient outline extracted from the planning reference Computed tomography (CT) was used as the reference for OSIS and CBCT alignment during treatment. We detected the setup uncertainty using CBCT and OSIS at the first five fractionations of RT and then twice a week. RESULTS: The absolute translational setup error (mean ± Standard deviation (SD)) in x (lateral), y (longitudinal), and z (vertical) axes detected by the OSIS was 0.14 ± 0.18, 0.15 ± 0.14, and 0.13 ± 0.13 cm, respectively. The rotational setup error (mean ± SD) in Rx (pitch), Ry (roll), and Rz (yaw) axes was 0.77 ± 0.54, 0.76 ± 0.61, and 1.23 ± 0.95, respectively. Significant difference is observed only in one direction (Rx, p = 0.03) in the paired setup errors obtaining from OSIS and CBCT, without significant differences in five directions. CONCLUSION: OSIS is a repeatable and reliable system that can be used to detect misalignments with accuracy, which is capable of supplementing CBCT for WBRT after BCS. We believe that an OSIS may be easier to use, quicker, and reduce overall dose as this method of patient alignment does not require ionizing radiation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9121044/ /pubmed/35293667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13578 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Jiang, Ping
Liu, Ziyi
Jiang, Weijuan
Qu, Ang
Sun, Haitao
Wang, Junjie
Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery
title Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery
title_full Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery
title_fullStr Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery
title_full_unstemmed Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery
title_short Detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery
title_sort detection of setup errors with a body‐surface laser‐scanning system for whole‐breast irradiation after breast‐conserving surgery
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35293667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13578
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangping detectionofsetuperrorswithabodysurfacelaserscanningsystemforwholebreastirradiationafterbreastconservingsurgery
AT liuziyi detectionofsetuperrorswithabodysurfacelaserscanningsystemforwholebreastirradiationafterbreastconservingsurgery
AT jiangweijuan detectionofsetuperrorswithabodysurfacelaserscanningsystemforwholebreastirradiationafterbreastconservingsurgery
AT quang detectionofsetuperrorswithabodysurfacelaserscanningsystemforwholebreastirradiationafterbreastconservingsurgery
AT sunhaitao detectionofsetuperrorswithabodysurfacelaserscanningsystemforwholebreastirradiationafterbreastconservingsurgery
AT wangjunjie detectionofsetuperrorswithabodysurfacelaserscanningsystemforwholebreastirradiationafterbreastconservingsurgery