Cargando…
A Virtual Community of Practice to Support Physician Uptake of a Novel Abortion Practice: Mixed Methods Case Study
BACKGROUND: Virtual communities of practice (VCoPs) have been used to support innovation and quality in clinical care. The drug mifepristone was introduced in Canada in 2017 for medical abortion. We created a VCoP to support implementation of mifepristone abortion practice across Canada. OBJECTIVE:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35511226 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34302 |
_version_ | 1784711110856802304 |
---|---|
author | Dunn, Sheila Munro, Sarah Devane, Courtney Guilbert, Edith Jeong, Dahn Stroulia, Eleni Soon, Judith A Norman, Wendy V |
author_facet | Dunn, Sheila Munro, Sarah Devane, Courtney Guilbert, Edith Jeong, Dahn Stroulia, Eleni Soon, Judith A Norman, Wendy V |
author_sort | Dunn, Sheila |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Virtual communities of practice (VCoPs) have been used to support innovation and quality in clinical care. The drug mifepristone was introduced in Canada in 2017 for medical abortion. We created a VCoP to support implementation of mifepristone abortion practice across Canada. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the development and use of the Canadian Abortion Providers Support-Communauté de pratique canadienne sur l’avortement (CAPS-CPCA) VCoP and explore physicians’ experience with CAPS-CPCA and their views on its value in supporting implementation. METHODS: This was a mixed methods intrinsic case study of Canadian health care providers’ use and physicians’ perceptions of the CAPS-CPCA VCoP during the first 2 years of a novel practice. We sampled both physicians who joined the CAPS-CPCA VCoP and those who were interested in providing the novel practice but did not join the VCoP. We designed the VCoP features to address known and discovered barriers to implementation of medication abortion in primary care. Our secure web-based platform allowed asynchronous access to information, practice resources, clinical support, discussion forums, and email notices. We collected data from the platform and through surveys of physician members as well as interviews with physician members and nonmembers. We analyzed descriptive statistics for website metrics, physicians’ characteristics and practices, and their use of the VCoP. We used qualitative methods to explore the physicians’ experiences and perceptions of the VCoP. RESULTS: From January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2019, a total of 430 physicians representing all provinces and territories in Canada joined the VCoP and 222 (51.6%) completed a baseline survey. Of these 222 respondents, 156 (70.3%) were family physicians, 170 (80.2%) were women, and 78 (35.1%) had no prior abortion experience. In a survey conducted 12 months after baseline, 77.9% (120/154) of the respondents stated that they had provided mifepristone abortion and 33.9% (43/127) said the VCoP had been important or very important. Logging in to the site was burdensome for some, but members valued downloadable resources such as patient information sheets, consent forms, and clinical checklists. They found email announcements helpful for keeping up to date with changing regulations. Few asked clinical questions to the VCoP experts, but physicians felt that this feature was important for isolated or rural providers. Information collected through member polls about health system barriers to implementation was used in the project’s knowledge translation activities with policy makers to mitigate these barriers. CONCLUSIONS: A VCoP developed to address known and discovered barriers to uptake of a novel medication abortion method engaged physicians from across Canada and supported some, including those with no prior abortion experience, to implement this practice. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028443 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9121225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91212252022-05-21 A Virtual Community of Practice to Support Physician Uptake of a Novel Abortion Practice: Mixed Methods Case Study Dunn, Sheila Munro, Sarah Devane, Courtney Guilbert, Edith Jeong, Dahn Stroulia, Eleni Soon, Judith A Norman, Wendy V J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Virtual communities of practice (VCoPs) have been used to support innovation and quality in clinical care. The drug mifepristone was introduced in Canada in 2017 for medical abortion. We created a VCoP to support implementation of mifepristone abortion practice across Canada. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the development and use of the Canadian Abortion Providers Support-Communauté de pratique canadienne sur l’avortement (CAPS-CPCA) VCoP and explore physicians’ experience with CAPS-CPCA and their views on its value in supporting implementation. METHODS: This was a mixed methods intrinsic case study of Canadian health care providers’ use and physicians’ perceptions of the CAPS-CPCA VCoP during the first 2 years of a novel practice. We sampled both physicians who joined the CAPS-CPCA VCoP and those who were interested in providing the novel practice but did not join the VCoP. We designed the VCoP features to address known and discovered barriers to implementation of medication abortion in primary care. Our secure web-based platform allowed asynchronous access to information, practice resources, clinical support, discussion forums, and email notices. We collected data from the platform and through surveys of physician members as well as interviews with physician members and nonmembers. We analyzed descriptive statistics for website metrics, physicians’ characteristics and practices, and their use of the VCoP. We used qualitative methods to explore the physicians’ experiences and perceptions of the VCoP. RESULTS: From January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2019, a total of 430 physicians representing all provinces and territories in Canada joined the VCoP and 222 (51.6%) completed a baseline survey. Of these 222 respondents, 156 (70.3%) were family physicians, 170 (80.2%) were women, and 78 (35.1%) had no prior abortion experience. In a survey conducted 12 months after baseline, 77.9% (120/154) of the respondents stated that they had provided mifepristone abortion and 33.9% (43/127) said the VCoP had been important or very important. Logging in to the site was burdensome for some, but members valued downloadable resources such as patient information sheets, consent forms, and clinical checklists. They found email announcements helpful for keeping up to date with changing regulations. Few asked clinical questions to the VCoP experts, but physicians felt that this feature was important for isolated or rural providers. Information collected through member polls about health system barriers to implementation was used in the project’s knowledge translation activities with policy makers to mitigate these barriers. CONCLUSIONS: A VCoP developed to address known and discovered barriers to uptake of a novel medication abortion method engaged physicians from across Canada and supported some, including those with no prior abortion experience, to implement this practice. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028443 JMIR Publications 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9121225/ /pubmed/35511226 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34302 Text en ©Sheila Dunn, Sarah Munro, Courtney Devane, Edith Guilbert, Dahn Jeong, Eleni Stroulia, Judith A Soon, Wendy V Norman. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 05.05.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Dunn, Sheila Munro, Sarah Devane, Courtney Guilbert, Edith Jeong, Dahn Stroulia, Eleni Soon, Judith A Norman, Wendy V A Virtual Community of Practice to Support Physician Uptake of a Novel Abortion Practice: Mixed Methods Case Study |
title | A Virtual Community of Practice to Support Physician Uptake of a Novel Abortion Practice: Mixed Methods Case Study |
title_full | A Virtual Community of Practice to Support Physician Uptake of a Novel Abortion Practice: Mixed Methods Case Study |
title_fullStr | A Virtual Community of Practice to Support Physician Uptake of a Novel Abortion Practice: Mixed Methods Case Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Virtual Community of Practice to Support Physician Uptake of a Novel Abortion Practice: Mixed Methods Case Study |
title_short | A Virtual Community of Practice to Support Physician Uptake of a Novel Abortion Practice: Mixed Methods Case Study |
title_sort | virtual community of practice to support physician uptake of a novel abortion practice: mixed methods case study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35511226 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dunnsheila avirtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy AT munrosarah avirtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy AT devanecourtney avirtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy AT guilbertedith avirtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy AT jeongdahn avirtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy AT strouliaeleni avirtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy AT soonjuditha avirtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy AT normanwendyv avirtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy AT dunnsheila virtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy AT munrosarah virtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy AT devanecourtney virtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy AT guilbertedith virtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy AT jeongdahn virtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy AT strouliaeleni virtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy AT soonjuditha virtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy AT normanwendyv virtualcommunityofpracticetosupportphysicianuptakeofanovelabortionpracticemixedmethodscasestudy |