Cargando…

Disc–fovea distance and choroidal thickness: is there a relationship?

BACKGROUND: The distance between the optic disc center and the fovea is a biometric parameter; however, it is unclear whether DFD (disc–fovea distance) affects the choroidal thickness. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the association between DFD and choroidal thickness. DESIGN: Thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cevher, Selim, Barış Üçer, Mehmet, Şahin, Tayfun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414221096062
_version_ 1784711152786210816
author Cevher, Selim
Barış Üçer, Mehmet
Şahin, Tayfun
author_facet Cevher, Selim
Barış Üçer, Mehmet
Şahin, Tayfun
author_sort Cevher, Selim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The distance between the optic disc center and the fovea is a biometric parameter; however, it is unclear whether DFD (disc–fovea distance) affects the choroidal thickness. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the association between DFD and choroidal thickness. DESIGN: This is a prospective, and cross-sectional study. METHODS: Two hundred fifty eyes of 250 healthy participants were examined in terms of DFD, age, axial length, spherical equivalent, and choroidal thickness. Inclusion criteria included aged between 20–40 years, no posterior segment disorders, and participants with best-corrected visual acuity (10/10 according to Snellen’s chart). Participants with high hypermetropia (>4 diopter) or myopia (>6 diopter) or any systemic disease likely to affect choroidal thickness were excluded. Choroidal thickness measurements were performed at subfoveal, 1.0 mm temporal, and 1.0 mm nasal using the enhanced-depth imaging optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: The mean age of all the participants was 26.21 ± 5.73 years, mean DFD was 4634.29 ± 274.70 µm, mean axial length was 23.62 ± 0.83 mm, and mean spherical equivalent was −0.61 ± 1.06 diopter. The mean subfoveal, nasal, and temporal choroidal thicknesses were 388.73 ± 90.15 µm, 351.26 ± 88.09 µm, and 366.50 ± 79.56 µm, respectively. A negative correlation was found between subfoveal, nasal, and temporal choroidal thicknesses and axial length (r = −0.157, p = 0.013; r = −0.168, p = 0.008; r = −0.174, p = 0.006, respectively). Insignificant correlation was found between choroidal thicknesses and spherical equivalent (p > 0.05). There was not a statistically significant correlation between DFD and subfoveal, nasal, and temporal choroidal thicknesses (r = −0.028, p = 0.655; r = 0.030, p = 0.641; r = −0.025, p = 0.699, respectively). In addition, there was not a statistically significant correlation between age and choroidal thickness. CONCLUSION: This study shows that DFD and spherical equivalent do not affect choroidal thickness; axial length negatively affects choroidal thickness. In addition, age does not affect choroidal thickness between 20 and 40 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9121458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91214582022-05-21 Disc–fovea distance and choroidal thickness: is there a relationship? Cevher, Selim Barış Üçer, Mehmet Şahin, Tayfun Ther Adv Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: The distance between the optic disc center and the fovea is a biometric parameter; however, it is unclear whether DFD (disc–fovea distance) affects the choroidal thickness. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the association between DFD and choroidal thickness. DESIGN: This is a prospective, and cross-sectional study. METHODS: Two hundred fifty eyes of 250 healthy participants were examined in terms of DFD, age, axial length, spherical equivalent, and choroidal thickness. Inclusion criteria included aged between 20–40 years, no posterior segment disorders, and participants with best-corrected visual acuity (10/10 according to Snellen’s chart). Participants with high hypermetropia (>4 diopter) or myopia (>6 diopter) or any systemic disease likely to affect choroidal thickness were excluded. Choroidal thickness measurements were performed at subfoveal, 1.0 mm temporal, and 1.0 mm nasal using the enhanced-depth imaging optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: The mean age of all the participants was 26.21 ± 5.73 years, mean DFD was 4634.29 ± 274.70 µm, mean axial length was 23.62 ± 0.83 mm, and mean spherical equivalent was −0.61 ± 1.06 diopter. The mean subfoveal, nasal, and temporal choroidal thicknesses were 388.73 ± 90.15 µm, 351.26 ± 88.09 µm, and 366.50 ± 79.56 µm, respectively. A negative correlation was found between subfoveal, nasal, and temporal choroidal thicknesses and axial length (r = −0.157, p = 0.013; r = −0.168, p = 0.008; r = −0.174, p = 0.006, respectively). Insignificant correlation was found between choroidal thicknesses and spherical equivalent (p > 0.05). There was not a statistically significant correlation between DFD and subfoveal, nasal, and temporal choroidal thicknesses (r = −0.028, p = 0.655; r = 0.030, p = 0.641; r = −0.025, p = 0.699, respectively). In addition, there was not a statistically significant correlation between age and choroidal thickness. CONCLUSION: This study shows that DFD and spherical equivalent do not affect choroidal thickness; axial length negatively affects choroidal thickness. In addition, age does not affect choroidal thickness between 20 and 40 years. SAGE Publications 2022-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9121458/ /pubmed/35602660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414221096062 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Cevher, Selim
Barış Üçer, Mehmet
Şahin, Tayfun
Disc–fovea distance and choroidal thickness: is there a relationship?
title Disc–fovea distance and choroidal thickness: is there a relationship?
title_full Disc–fovea distance and choroidal thickness: is there a relationship?
title_fullStr Disc–fovea distance and choroidal thickness: is there a relationship?
title_full_unstemmed Disc–fovea distance and choroidal thickness: is there a relationship?
title_short Disc–fovea distance and choroidal thickness: is there a relationship?
title_sort disc–fovea distance and choroidal thickness: is there a relationship?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414221096062
work_keys_str_mv AT cevherselim discfoveadistanceandchoroidalthicknessistherearelationship
AT barısucermehmet discfoveadistanceandchoroidalthicknessistherearelationship
AT sahintayfun discfoveadistanceandchoroidalthicknessistherearelationship