Cargando…

Guidance relevant to the reporting of health equity in observational research: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Health inequities are defined as unfair and avoidable differences in health between groups within a population. Most health research is conducted through observational studies, which are able to offer real-world insights about etiology, healthcare policy/programme effectiveness and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rizvi, Anita, Lawson, Daeria O, Young, Taryn, Dewidar, Omar, Nicholls, Stuart, Akl, Elie A, Little, Julian, Magwood, Olivia, Shamseer, Larissa, Ghogomu, Elizabeth, Jull, Janet Elizabeth, Rader, Tamara, Bhutta, Zulfiqar, Chamberlain, Catherine, Ellingwood, Holly, Greer-Smith, Regina, Hardy, Billie-Jo, Harwood, Matire, Kennedy, Michelle, Kredo, Tamara, Loder, Elizabeth, Mahande, Michael Johnson J, Mbuagbaw, Lawrence, Nkangu, Miriam, Okwen, Patrick M, Ramke, Jacqueline, Tufte, Janice, Tugwell, Peter, Wang, Xiaoqin, Wiysonge, Charles Shey, Welch, Vivian A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35589369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056875
_version_ 1784711163239464960
author Rizvi, Anita
Lawson, Daeria O
Young, Taryn
Dewidar, Omar
Nicholls, Stuart
Akl, Elie A
Little, Julian
Magwood, Olivia
Shamseer, Larissa
Ghogomu, Elizabeth
Jull, Janet Elizabeth
Rader, Tamara
Bhutta, Zulfiqar
Chamberlain, Catherine
Ellingwood, Holly
Greer-Smith, Regina
Hardy, Billie-Jo
Harwood, Matire
Kennedy, Michelle
Kredo, Tamara
Loder, Elizabeth
Mahande, Michael Johnson J
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
Nkangu, Miriam
Okwen, Patrick M
Ramke, Jacqueline
Tufte, Janice
Tugwell, Peter
Wang, Xiaoqin
Wiysonge, Charles Shey
Welch, Vivian A
author_facet Rizvi, Anita
Lawson, Daeria O
Young, Taryn
Dewidar, Omar
Nicholls, Stuart
Akl, Elie A
Little, Julian
Magwood, Olivia
Shamseer, Larissa
Ghogomu, Elizabeth
Jull, Janet Elizabeth
Rader, Tamara
Bhutta, Zulfiqar
Chamberlain, Catherine
Ellingwood, Holly
Greer-Smith, Regina
Hardy, Billie-Jo
Harwood, Matire
Kennedy, Michelle
Kredo, Tamara
Loder, Elizabeth
Mahande, Michael Johnson J
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
Nkangu, Miriam
Okwen, Patrick M
Ramke, Jacqueline
Tufte, Janice
Tugwell, Peter
Wang, Xiaoqin
Wiysonge, Charles Shey
Welch, Vivian A
author_sort Rizvi, Anita
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Health inequities are defined as unfair and avoidable differences in health between groups within a population. Most health research is conducted through observational studies, which are able to offer real-world insights about etiology, healthcare policy/programme effectiveness and the impacts of socioeconomic factors. However, most published reports of observational studies do not address how their findings relate to health equity. Our team seeks to develop equity-relevant reporting guidance as an extension of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. This scoping review will inform the development of candidate items for the STROBE-Equity extension. We will operationalise equity-seeking populations using the PROGRESS-Plus framework of sociodemographic factors. As part of a parallel stream of the STROBE-Equity project, the relevance of candidate guideline items to Indigenous research will be led by Indigenous coinvestigators on the team. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute method for conducting scoping reviews. We will evaluate the extent to which the identified guidance supports or refutes our preliminary candidate items for reporting equity in observational studies. These candidate items were developed based on items from equity-reporting guidelines for randomised trials and systematic reviews, developed by members of this team. We will consult with our knowledge users, patients/public partners and Indigenous research steering committee to invite suggestions for relevant guidance documents and interpretation of findings. If the identified guidance suggests the need for additional candidate items, they will be developed through inductive thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We will follow a principled approach that promotes ethical codevelopment with our community partners, based on principles of cultural safety, authentic partnerships, addressing colonial structures in knowledge production and the shared ownership, interpretation, and dissemination of research. All products of this research will be published as open access.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9121499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91214992022-06-04 Guidance relevant to the reporting of health equity in observational research: a scoping review protocol Rizvi, Anita Lawson, Daeria O Young, Taryn Dewidar, Omar Nicholls, Stuart Akl, Elie A Little, Julian Magwood, Olivia Shamseer, Larissa Ghogomu, Elizabeth Jull, Janet Elizabeth Rader, Tamara Bhutta, Zulfiqar Chamberlain, Catherine Ellingwood, Holly Greer-Smith, Regina Hardy, Billie-Jo Harwood, Matire Kennedy, Michelle Kredo, Tamara Loder, Elizabeth Mahande, Michael Johnson J Mbuagbaw, Lawrence Nkangu, Miriam Okwen, Patrick M Ramke, Jacqueline Tufte, Janice Tugwell, Peter Wang, Xiaoqin Wiysonge, Charles Shey Welch, Vivian A BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: Health inequities are defined as unfair and avoidable differences in health between groups within a population. Most health research is conducted through observational studies, which are able to offer real-world insights about etiology, healthcare policy/programme effectiveness and the impacts of socioeconomic factors. However, most published reports of observational studies do not address how their findings relate to health equity. Our team seeks to develop equity-relevant reporting guidance as an extension of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. This scoping review will inform the development of candidate items for the STROBE-Equity extension. We will operationalise equity-seeking populations using the PROGRESS-Plus framework of sociodemographic factors. As part of a parallel stream of the STROBE-Equity project, the relevance of candidate guideline items to Indigenous research will be led by Indigenous coinvestigators on the team. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute method for conducting scoping reviews. We will evaluate the extent to which the identified guidance supports or refutes our preliminary candidate items for reporting equity in observational studies. These candidate items were developed based on items from equity-reporting guidelines for randomised trials and systematic reviews, developed by members of this team. We will consult with our knowledge users, patients/public partners and Indigenous research steering committee to invite suggestions for relevant guidance documents and interpretation of findings. If the identified guidance suggests the need for additional candidate items, they will be developed through inductive thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We will follow a principled approach that promotes ethical codevelopment with our community partners, based on principles of cultural safety, authentic partnerships, addressing colonial structures in knowledge production and the shared ownership, interpretation, and dissemination of research. All products of this research will be published as open access. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9121499/ /pubmed/35589369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056875 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Methods
Rizvi, Anita
Lawson, Daeria O
Young, Taryn
Dewidar, Omar
Nicholls, Stuart
Akl, Elie A
Little, Julian
Magwood, Olivia
Shamseer, Larissa
Ghogomu, Elizabeth
Jull, Janet Elizabeth
Rader, Tamara
Bhutta, Zulfiqar
Chamberlain, Catherine
Ellingwood, Holly
Greer-Smith, Regina
Hardy, Billie-Jo
Harwood, Matire
Kennedy, Michelle
Kredo, Tamara
Loder, Elizabeth
Mahande, Michael Johnson J
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
Nkangu, Miriam
Okwen, Patrick M
Ramke, Jacqueline
Tufte, Janice
Tugwell, Peter
Wang, Xiaoqin
Wiysonge, Charles Shey
Welch, Vivian A
Guidance relevant to the reporting of health equity in observational research: a scoping review protocol
title Guidance relevant to the reporting of health equity in observational research: a scoping review protocol
title_full Guidance relevant to the reporting of health equity in observational research: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Guidance relevant to the reporting of health equity in observational research: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Guidance relevant to the reporting of health equity in observational research: a scoping review protocol
title_short Guidance relevant to the reporting of health equity in observational research: a scoping review protocol
title_sort guidance relevant to the reporting of health equity in observational research: a scoping review protocol
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35589369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056875
work_keys_str_mv AT rizvianita guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT lawsondaeriao guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT youngtaryn guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT dewidaromar guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT nichollsstuart guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT akleliea guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT littlejulian guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT magwoodolivia guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT shamseerlarissa guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT ghogomuelizabeth guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT julljanetelizabeth guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT radertamara guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT bhuttazulfiqar guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT chamberlaincatherine guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT ellingwoodholly guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT greersmithregina guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT hardybilliejo guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT harwoodmatire guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT kennedymichelle guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT kredotamara guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT loderelizabeth guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT mahandemichaeljohnsonj guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT mbuagbawlawrence guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT nkangumiriam guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT okwenpatrickm guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT ramkejacqueline guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT tuftejanice guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT tugwellpeter guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT wangxiaoqin guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT wiysongecharlesshey guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol
AT welchviviana guidancerelevanttothereportingofhealthequityinobservationalresearchascopingreviewprotocol