Cargando…
A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals used in ophthalmology
Systemic immunosuppressants and biologicals have been a valuable tool in the treatment of inflammatory diseases and malignancies. The safety profile of these drugs has been debatable, especially in localized systems, such as the eye. This has led to the search for fairly local approaches, such as in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414221097418 |
_version_ | 1784711164782968832 |
---|---|
author | Hasan, Nasiq Chawla, Rohan Shaikh, Nawazish Kandasamy, Sindhuja Azad, Shorya Vardhan Sundar, M. Dheepak |
author_facet | Hasan, Nasiq Chawla, Rohan Shaikh, Nawazish Kandasamy, Sindhuja Azad, Shorya Vardhan Sundar, M. Dheepak |
author_sort | Hasan, Nasiq |
collection | PubMed |
description | Systemic immunosuppressants and biologicals have been a valuable tool in the treatment of inflammatory diseases and malignancies. The safety profile of these drugs has been debatable, especially in localized systems, such as the eye. This has led to the search for fairly local approaches, such as intravitreal, subconjunctival, and topical route of administration. Immunosuppressants have been used as a second-line drug in patients intolerable to corticosteroids or those who develop multiple recurrences on weaning corticosteroids. Similarly, biologicals have also been used as the next line of therapy, when adequate control of inflammation could not be attained or immunosuppressants were contraindicated to patients. Intravitreal immunosuppressants, such as methotrexate and sirolimus, have been extensively studied in noninfectious posterior uveitis, whereas limited studies have established the efficacy of intravitreal biologicals, such as infliximab and adalimumab. Most of these drugs have shown good safety profile and tolerability in animal studies alone and have not been studied further in human subjects. However, most of the studies in literature are single-case reports or case series which limits the level of evidence. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, indications, efficacy, and side effects of different intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals that have been studied in literature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9121505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91215052022-05-21 A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals used in ophthalmology Hasan, Nasiq Chawla, Rohan Shaikh, Nawazish Kandasamy, Sindhuja Azad, Shorya Vardhan Sundar, M. Dheepak Ther Adv Ophthalmol Review Systemic immunosuppressants and biologicals have been a valuable tool in the treatment of inflammatory diseases and malignancies. The safety profile of these drugs has been debatable, especially in localized systems, such as the eye. This has led to the search for fairly local approaches, such as intravitreal, subconjunctival, and topical route of administration. Immunosuppressants have been used as a second-line drug in patients intolerable to corticosteroids or those who develop multiple recurrences on weaning corticosteroids. Similarly, biologicals have also been used as the next line of therapy, when adequate control of inflammation could not be attained or immunosuppressants were contraindicated to patients. Intravitreal immunosuppressants, such as methotrexate and sirolimus, have been extensively studied in noninfectious posterior uveitis, whereas limited studies have established the efficacy of intravitreal biologicals, such as infliximab and adalimumab. Most of these drugs have shown good safety profile and tolerability in animal studies alone and have not been studied further in human subjects. However, most of the studies in literature are single-case reports or case series which limits the level of evidence. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, indications, efficacy, and side effects of different intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals that have been studied in literature. SAGE Publications 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9121505/ /pubmed/35602659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414221097418 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Hasan, Nasiq Chawla, Rohan Shaikh, Nawazish Kandasamy, Sindhuja Azad, Shorya Vardhan Sundar, M. Dheepak A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals used in ophthalmology |
title | A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and
biologicals used in ophthalmology |
title_full | A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and
biologicals used in ophthalmology |
title_fullStr | A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and
biologicals used in ophthalmology |
title_full_unstemmed | A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and
biologicals used in ophthalmology |
title_short | A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and
biologicals used in ophthalmology |
title_sort | comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and
biologicals used in ophthalmology |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414221097418 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hasannasiq acomprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology AT chawlarohan acomprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology AT shaikhnawazish acomprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology AT kandasamysindhuja acomprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology AT azadshoryavardhan acomprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology AT sundarmdheepak acomprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology AT hasannasiq comprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology AT chawlarohan comprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology AT shaikhnawazish comprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology AT kandasamysindhuja comprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology AT azadshoryavardhan comprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology AT sundarmdheepak comprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology |