Cargando…

A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals used in ophthalmology

Systemic immunosuppressants and biologicals have been a valuable tool in the treatment of inflammatory diseases and malignancies. The safety profile of these drugs has been debatable, especially in localized systems, such as the eye. This has led to the search for fairly local approaches, such as in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasan, Nasiq, Chawla, Rohan, Shaikh, Nawazish, Kandasamy, Sindhuja, Azad, Shorya Vardhan, Sundar, M. Dheepak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414221097418
_version_ 1784711164782968832
author Hasan, Nasiq
Chawla, Rohan
Shaikh, Nawazish
Kandasamy, Sindhuja
Azad, Shorya Vardhan
Sundar, M. Dheepak
author_facet Hasan, Nasiq
Chawla, Rohan
Shaikh, Nawazish
Kandasamy, Sindhuja
Azad, Shorya Vardhan
Sundar, M. Dheepak
author_sort Hasan, Nasiq
collection PubMed
description Systemic immunosuppressants and biologicals have been a valuable tool in the treatment of inflammatory diseases and malignancies. The safety profile of these drugs has been debatable, especially in localized systems, such as the eye. This has led to the search for fairly local approaches, such as intravitreal, subconjunctival, and topical route of administration. Immunosuppressants have been used as a second-line drug in patients intolerable to corticosteroids or those who develop multiple recurrences on weaning corticosteroids. Similarly, biologicals have also been used as the next line of therapy, when adequate control of inflammation could not be attained or immunosuppressants were contraindicated to patients. Intravitreal immunosuppressants, such as methotrexate and sirolimus, have been extensively studied in noninfectious posterior uveitis, whereas limited studies have established the efficacy of intravitreal biologicals, such as infliximab and adalimumab. Most of these drugs have shown good safety profile and tolerability in animal studies alone and have not been studied further in human subjects. However, most of the studies in literature are single-case reports or case series which limits the level of evidence. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, indications, efficacy, and side effects of different intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals that have been studied in literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9121505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91215052022-05-21 A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals used in ophthalmology Hasan, Nasiq Chawla, Rohan Shaikh, Nawazish Kandasamy, Sindhuja Azad, Shorya Vardhan Sundar, M. Dheepak Ther Adv Ophthalmol Review Systemic immunosuppressants and biologicals have been a valuable tool in the treatment of inflammatory diseases and malignancies. The safety profile of these drugs has been debatable, especially in localized systems, such as the eye. This has led to the search for fairly local approaches, such as intravitreal, subconjunctival, and topical route of administration. Immunosuppressants have been used as a second-line drug in patients intolerable to corticosteroids or those who develop multiple recurrences on weaning corticosteroids. Similarly, biologicals have also been used as the next line of therapy, when adequate control of inflammation could not be attained or immunosuppressants were contraindicated to patients. Intravitreal immunosuppressants, such as methotrexate and sirolimus, have been extensively studied in noninfectious posterior uveitis, whereas limited studies have established the efficacy of intravitreal biologicals, such as infliximab and adalimumab. Most of these drugs have shown good safety profile and tolerability in animal studies alone and have not been studied further in human subjects. However, most of the studies in literature are single-case reports or case series which limits the level of evidence. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, indications, efficacy, and side effects of different intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals that have been studied in literature. SAGE Publications 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9121505/ /pubmed/35602659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414221097418 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Hasan, Nasiq
Chawla, Rohan
Shaikh, Nawazish
Kandasamy, Sindhuja
Azad, Shorya Vardhan
Sundar, M. Dheepak
A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals used in ophthalmology
title A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals used in ophthalmology
title_full A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals used in ophthalmology
title_fullStr A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals used in ophthalmology
title_full_unstemmed A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals used in ophthalmology
title_short A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals used in ophthalmology
title_sort comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals used in ophthalmology
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414221097418
work_keys_str_mv AT hasannasiq acomprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology
AT chawlarohan acomprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology
AT shaikhnawazish acomprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology
AT kandasamysindhuja acomprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology
AT azadshoryavardhan acomprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology
AT sundarmdheepak acomprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology
AT hasannasiq comprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology
AT chawlarohan comprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology
AT shaikhnawazish comprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology
AT kandasamysindhuja comprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology
AT azadshoryavardhan comprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology
AT sundarmdheepak comprehensivereviewofintravitrealimmunosuppressantsandbiologicalsusedinophthalmology