Cargando…

Effects of standard and total two-field lymph node dissection on prognosis of patients undergoing Esophagectomy

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of standard two-field lymph node dissection (2FLND) and total 2FLND on the short-term and long-term clinical efficacy and complications of patients undergoing esophagectomy. METHODS: The clinical data of 268 patients undergoing radical Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Qiang, Li, Hefei, Wang, Haibo, Zhang, Duo, Li, Yonghui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634593
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.4.4031
_version_ 1784711247658221568
author Guo, Qiang
Li, Hefei
Wang, Haibo
Zhang, Duo
Li, Yonghui
author_facet Guo, Qiang
Li, Hefei
Wang, Haibo
Zhang, Duo
Li, Yonghui
author_sort Guo, Qiang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of standard two-field lymph node dissection (2FLND) and total 2FLND on the short-term and long-term clinical efficacy and complications of patients undergoing esophagectomy. METHODS: The clinical data of 268 patients undergoing radical Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in our hospital from January 2008 to November 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According to different methods of lymph node dissection (LND), the patients were divided into standard 2FLND group (n = 121) and total 2FLND group (n = 147). The LND status, postoperative complications, survival rate and lymph node recurrence of the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Lymph node metastasis rate showed no statistically significant difference between the standard 2FLND group and the total 2FLND group (71.1% and 63.3%, respectively, P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was 5.8% (7/121) in the standard 2FLND group, which was lower than that in the total 2FLND group [17.0% (25/147)], with a statistically significant difference (χ(2) = 7.948, P < 0.01). The 5-year survival rate of the standard 2FLND group and the total 2FLND group was 29.8% and 28.6%, respectively, without statistically significant difference (χ(2) = 0.005, P > 0.05). The lymph node recurrence rate in the standard 2FLND group was 41.3% (50/121), which was higher than 19.0% (28/147) of the total 2FLND group (χ(2) = 15.959, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Compared with standard 2FLND, total 2FLND does not improve the postoperative survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma, and the risk of complications is higher.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9121942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Professional Medical Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91219422022-05-27 Effects of standard and total two-field lymph node dissection on prognosis of patients undergoing Esophagectomy Guo, Qiang Li, Hefei Wang, Haibo Zhang, Duo Li, Yonghui Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of standard two-field lymph node dissection (2FLND) and total 2FLND on the short-term and long-term clinical efficacy and complications of patients undergoing esophagectomy. METHODS: The clinical data of 268 patients undergoing radical Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in our hospital from January 2008 to November 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According to different methods of lymph node dissection (LND), the patients were divided into standard 2FLND group (n = 121) and total 2FLND group (n = 147). The LND status, postoperative complications, survival rate and lymph node recurrence of the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Lymph node metastasis rate showed no statistically significant difference between the standard 2FLND group and the total 2FLND group (71.1% and 63.3%, respectively, P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was 5.8% (7/121) in the standard 2FLND group, which was lower than that in the total 2FLND group [17.0% (25/147)], with a statistically significant difference (χ(2) = 7.948, P < 0.01). The 5-year survival rate of the standard 2FLND group and the total 2FLND group was 29.8% and 28.6%, respectively, without statistically significant difference (χ(2) = 0.005, P > 0.05). The lymph node recurrence rate in the standard 2FLND group was 41.3% (50/121), which was higher than 19.0% (28/147) of the total 2FLND group (χ(2) = 15.959, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Compared with standard 2FLND, total 2FLND does not improve the postoperative survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma, and the risk of complications is higher. Professional Medical Publications 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9121942/ /pubmed/35634593 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.4.4031 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Guo, Qiang
Li, Hefei
Wang, Haibo
Zhang, Duo
Li, Yonghui
Effects of standard and total two-field lymph node dissection on prognosis of patients undergoing Esophagectomy
title Effects of standard and total two-field lymph node dissection on prognosis of patients undergoing Esophagectomy
title_full Effects of standard and total two-field lymph node dissection on prognosis of patients undergoing Esophagectomy
title_fullStr Effects of standard and total two-field lymph node dissection on prognosis of patients undergoing Esophagectomy
title_full_unstemmed Effects of standard and total two-field lymph node dissection on prognosis of patients undergoing Esophagectomy
title_short Effects of standard and total two-field lymph node dissection on prognosis of patients undergoing Esophagectomy
title_sort effects of standard and total two-field lymph node dissection on prognosis of patients undergoing esophagectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634593
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.4.4031
work_keys_str_mv AT guoqiang effectsofstandardandtotaltwofieldlymphnodedissectiononprognosisofpatientsundergoingesophagectomy
AT lihefei effectsofstandardandtotaltwofieldlymphnodedissectiononprognosisofpatientsundergoingesophagectomy
AT wanghaibo effectsofstandardandtotaltwofieldlymphnodedissectiononprognosisofpatientsundergoingesophagectomy
AT zhangduo effectsofstandardandtotaltwofieldlymphnodedissectiononprognosisofpatientsundergoingesophagectomy
AT liyonghui effectsofstandardandtotaltwofieldlymphnodedissectiononprognosisofpatientsundergoingesophagectomy