Cargando…
Efficacy of Articaine vs Lignocaine for infiltration anaesthesia during primary molar extractions
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate if articaine has better efficacy as compared to lignocaine when used for infiltration anaesthesia for primary molar extractions. METHODS: The electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, BioMed Central, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar...
Autores principales: | Chen, Song, Xiang, Jie, Ji, Yan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Professional Medical Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634630 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.4.5343 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Anesthetic Efficacy of Single Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine in Extraction of Maxillary 1(st) Molar
por: Kumar, D Prasanna, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery
por: Phyo, Hnin Ei, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Assessing the Pain Reaction of Children and Evaluation of Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration with Articaine and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block with Lignocaine for Pulp Therapy in Primary Mandibular Second Molars
por: Daneswari, Velagala, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study
por: Dhake, Parag, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lignocaine during the surgical removal of the third molar: A comparative prospective study
por: Jain, Nikil Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2016)