Cargando…
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials
Beyond the overall relapse-free survival (RFS) advantage demonstrated in randomized trials (RCT) of adjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in radically resected stage III–IV melanoma, key issues about subgroups of interest have been raised in recent years, with non-conclusive results when considering sing...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33881961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1902723 |
_version_ | 1784711330326904832 |
---|---|
author | Bersanelli, Melissa Petrelli, Fausto Buti, Sebastiano Stanganelli, Ignazio |
author_facet | Bersanelli, Melissa Petrelli, Fausto Buti, Sebastiano Stanganelli, Ignazio |
author_sort | Bersanelli, Melissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Beyond the overall relapse-free survival (RFS) advantage demonstrated in randomized trials (RCT) of adjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in radically resected stage III–IV melanoma, key issues about subgroups of interest have been raised in recent years, with non-conclusive results when considering single studies. In the present meta analysis, we pooled all RCT data in this setting, analyzing, overall, 3043 patients. The RFS benefit of adjuvant immunotherapy over the comparator (placebo or anti-CTLA-4) was strongly confirmed in the pooled analysis, and it was statistically significant in most subgroups, excluding patients with stage IIIA and stage IV M1c melanoma. Nevertheless, the relative benefit was not statistically significantly different when considering their IIIB-IIIC and M1a-M1b counterparts. Future trials in this setting should consider subgroups of interest for tailoring the adjuvant strategy in terms of duration and drug combination in light of literature data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9122382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91223822022-05-21 Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials Bersanelli, Melissa Petrelli, Fausto Buti, Sebastiano Stanganelli, Ignazio Hum Vaccin Immunother Melanoma Immunotherapy SF – Research Paper Beyond the overall relapse-free survival (RFS) advantage demonstrated in randomized trials (RCT) of adjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in radically resected stage III–IV melanoma, key issues about subgroups of interest have been raised in recent years, with non-conclusive results when considering single studies. In the present meta analysis, we pooled all RCT data in this setting, analyzing, overall, 3043 patients. The RFS benefit of adjuvant immunotherapy over the comparator (placebo or anti-CTLA-4) was strongly confirmed in the pooled analysis, and it was statistically significant in most subgroups, excluding patients with stage IIIA and stage IV M1c melanoma. Nevertheless, the relative benefit was not statistically significantly different when considering their IIIB-IIIC and M1a-M1b counterparts. Future trials in this setting should consider subgroups of interest for tailoring the adjuvant strategy in terms of duration and drug combination in light of literature data. Taylor & Francis 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9122382/ /pubmed/33881961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1902723 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Melanoma Immunotherapy SF – Research Paper Bersanelli, Melissa Petrelli, Fausto Buti, Sebastiano Stanganelli, Ignazio Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials |
title | Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials |
title_full | Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials |
title_fullStr | Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials |
title_short | Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials |
title_sort | immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials |
topic | Melanoma Immunotherapy SF – Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33881961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1902723 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bersanellimelissa immunecheckpointinhibitorsinadjuvantsettingafterradicalresectionofmelanomaametaanalysisofthepivotaltrials AT petrellifausto immunecheckpointinhibitorsinadjuvantsettingafterradicalresectionofmelanomaametaanalysisofthepivotaltrials AT butisebastiano immunecheckpointinhibitorsinadjuvantsettingafterradicalresectionofmelanomaametaanalysisofthepivotaltrials AT stanganelliignazio immunecheckpointinhibitorsinadjuvantsettingafterradicalresectionofmelanomaametaanalysisofthepivotaltrials |