Cargando…

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials

Beyond the overall relapse-free survival (RFS) advantage demonstrated in randomized trials (RCT) of adjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in radically resected stage III–IV melanoma, key issues about subgroups of interest have been raised in recent years, with non-conclusive results when considering sing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bersanelli, Melissa, Petrelli, Fausto, Buti, Sebastiano, Stanganelli, Ignazio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33881961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1902723
_version_ 1784711330326904832
author Bersanelli, Melissa
Petrelli, Fausto
Buti, Sebastiano
Stanganelli, Ignazio
author_facet Bersanelli, Melissa
Petrelli, Fausto
Buti, Sebastiano
Stanganelli, Ignazio
author_sort Bersanelli, Melissa
collection PubMed
description Beyond the overall relapse-free survival (RFS) advantage demonstrated in randomized trials (RCT) of adjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in radically resected stage III–IV melanoma, key issues about subgroups of interest have been raised in recent years, with non-conclusive results when considering single studies. In the present meta analysis, we pooled all RCT data in this setting, analyzing, overall, 3043 patients. The RFS benefit of adjuvant immunotherapy over the comparator (placebo or anti-CTLA-4) was strongly confirmed in the pooled analysis, and it was statistically significant in most subgroups, excluding patients with stage IIIA and stage IV M1c melanoma. Nevertheless, the relative benefit was not statistically significantly different when considering their IIIB-IIIC and M1a-M1b counterparts. Future trials in this setting should consider subgroups of interest for tailoring the adjuvant strategy in terms of duration and drug combination in light of literature data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9122382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91223822022-05-21 Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials Bersanelli, Melissa Petrelli, Fausto Buti, Sebastiano Stanganelli, Ignazio Hum Vaccin Immunother Melanoma Immunotherapy SF – Research Paper Beyond the overall relapse-free survival (RFS) advantage demonstrated in randomized trials (RCT) of adjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in radically resected stage III–IV melanoma, key issues about subgroups of interest have been raised in recent years, with non-conclusive results when considering single studies. In the present meta analysis, we pooled all RCT data in this setting, analyzing, overall, 3043 patients. The RFS benefit of adjuvant immunotherapy over the comparator (placebo or anti-CTLA-4) was strongly confirmed in the pooled analysis, and it was statistically significant in most subgroups, excluding patients with stage IIIA and stage IV M1c melanoma. Nevertheless, the relative benefit was not statistically significantly different when considering their IIIB-IIIC and M1a-M1b counterparts. Future trials in this setting should consider subgroups of interest for tailoring the adjuvant strategy in terms of duration and drug combination in light of literature data. Taylor & Francis 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9122382/ /pubmed/33881961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1902723 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Melanoma Immunotherapy SF – Research Paper
Bersanelli, Melissa
Petrelli, Fausto
Buti, Sebastiano
Stanganelli, Ignazio
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials
title Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials
title_full Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials
title_fullStr Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials
title_full_unstemmed Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials
title_short Immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials
title_sort immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant setting after radical resection of melanoma: a meta-analysis of the pivotal trials
topic Melanoma Immunotherapy SF – Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33881961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1902723
work_keys_str_mv AT bersanellimelissa immunecheckpointinhibitorsinadjuvantsettingafterradicalresectionofmelanomaametaanalysisofthepivotaltrials
AT petrellifausto immunecheckpointinhibitorsinadjuvantsettingafterradicalresectionofmelanomaametaanalysisofthepivotaltrials
AT butisebastiano immunecheckpointinhibitorsinadjuvantsettingafterradicalresectionofmelanomaametaanalysisofthepivotaltrials
AT stanganelliignazio immunecheckpointinhibitorsinadjuvantsettingafterradicalresectionofmelanomaametaanalysisofthepivotaltrials