Cargando…

CT measures of femoral and tibial version and rotational position of femoral and tibial components of knee replacements: limitations in reliability and suitability for routine clinical practice

OBJECTIVES: Rotational malalignment of knee replacements as measured on CT is understood to be associated with poor outcomes. The aim of this study is to measure the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of measures of femoral and tibial version in the native arthritic knee and postoperative TKR c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toms, Andoni P., Rifai, Tamam, Whitehouse, Celia, McNamara, Iain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35142899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08483-8
_version_ 1784711437750370304
author Toms, Andoni P.
Rifai, Tamam
Whitehouse, Celia
McNamara, Iain
author_facet Toms, Andoni P.
Rifai, Tamam
Whitehouse, Celia
McNamara, Iain
author_sort Toms, Andoni P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Rotational malalignment of knee replacements as measured on CT is understood to be associated with poor outcomes. The aim of this study is to measure the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of measures of femoral and tibial version in the native arthritic knee and postoperative TKR component position using CT. METHODS: Eighty patients underwent CT of the knee before and after total knee replacement. Preoperative femoral and tibial version and component rotation were independently measured by two musculoskeletal radiologists. RESULTS: Mean differences between and within raters were small (< 1.6°). Maximum 95% limits of agreement for inter-rater and intra-rater comparisons were 8.1° and 7.6° for preoperative femoral version, 9.0° and 7.9° for postoperative femoral rotation, 26.0° and 20.5° for preoperative tibial version, and 24.9° and 23.6° for postoperative tibial rotation respectively. Postoperative ICCs varied from 0.68 to 0.81 (lower 95% CI:0.55–0.72) for both intra- and inter-rater comparisons. Preoperative ICCs were lower: 0.55–0.75 (lower 95% CI:0.40–0.65). CONCLUSION: The lower 95% confidence level for ICC of version and rotational measurements using the Berger protocol of TKRs on CT are all less than 0.73 and that the normal range of differences between observers is up to 9° for the femoral component and 26° for the tibial component. This suggests that CT measurements derived from the Berger protocol may not be consistent enough for clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • CT is commonly used to measure the rotational profile of knee replacements in symptomatic patients using the Berger protocol. • The limits of agreement for both femoral and tibial component rotation are wide even for experienced observers. • CT measurements of the rotation of knee arthroplasty are not reliable enough for routine clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9122870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91228702022-05-22 CT measures of femoral and tibial version and rotational position of femoral and tibial components of knee replacements: limitations in reliability and suitability for routine clinical practice Toms, Andoni P. Rifai, Tamam Whitehouse, Celia McNamara, Iain Eur Radiol Computed Tomography OBJECTIVES: Rotational malalignment of knee replacements as measured on CT is understood to be associated with poor outcomes. The aim of this study is to measure the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of measures of femoral and tibial version in the native arthritic knee and postoperative TKR component position using CT. METHODS: Eighty patients underwent CT of the knee before and after total knee replacement. Preoperative femoral and tibial version and component rotation were independently measured by two musculoskeletal radiologists. RESULTS: Mean differences between and within raters were small (< 1.6°). Maximum 95% limits of agreement for inter-rater and intra-rater comparisons were 8.1° and 7.6° for preoperative femoral version, 9.0° and 7.9° for postoperative femoral rotation, 26.0° and 20.5° for preoperative tibial version, and 24.9° and 23.6° for postoperative tibial rotation respectively. Postoperative ICCs varied from 0.68 to 0.81 (lower 95% CI:0.55–0.72) for both intra- and inter-rater comparisons. Preoperative ICCs were lower: 0.55–0.75 (lower 95% CI:0.40–0.65). CONCLUSION: The lower 95% confidence level for ICC of version and rotational measurements using the Berger protocol of TKRs on CT are all less than 0.73 and that the normal range of differences between observers is up to 9° for the femoral component and 26° for the tibial component. This suggests that CT measurements derived from the Berger protocol may not be consistent enough for clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • CT is commonly used to measure the rotational profile of knee replacements in symptomatic patients using the Berger protocol. • The limits of agreement for both femoral and tibial component rotation are wide even for experienced observers. • CT measurements of the rotation of knee arthroplasty are not reliable enough for routine clinical use. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9122870/ /pubmed/35142899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08483-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Computed Tomography
Toms, Andoni P.
Rifai, Tamam
Whitehouse, Celia
McNamara, Iain
CT measures of femoral and tibial version and rotational position of femoral and tibial components of knee replacements: limitations in reliability and suitability for routine clinical practice
title CT measures of femoral and tibial version and rotational position of femoral and tibial components of knee replacements: limitations in reliability and suitability for routine clinical practice
title_full CT measures of femoral and tibial version and rotational position of femoral and tibial components of knee replacements: limitations in reliability and suitability for routine clinical practice
title_fullStr CT measures of femoral and tibial version and rotational position of femoral and tibial components of knee replacements: limitations in reliability and suitability for routine clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed CT measures of femoral and tibial version and rotational position of femoral and tibial components of knee replacements: limitations in reliability and suitability for routine clinical practice
title_short CT measures of femoral and tibial version and rotational position of femoral and tibial components of knee replacements: limitations in reliability and suitability for routine clinical practice
title_sort ct measures of femoral and tibial version and rotational position of femoral and tibial components of knee replacements: limitations in reliability and suitability for routine clinical practice
topic Computed Tomography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35142899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08483-8
work_keys_str_mv AT tomsandonip ctmeasuresoffemoralandtibialversionandrotationalpositionoffemoralandtibialcomponentsofkneereplacementslimitationsinreliabilityandsuitabilityforroutineclinicalpractice
AT rifaitamam ctmeasuresoffemoralandtibialversionandrotationalpositionoffemoralandtibialcomponentsofkneereplacementslimitationsinreliabilityandsuitabilityforroutineclinicalpractice
AT whitehousecelia ctmeasuresoffemoralandtibialversionandrotationalpositionoffemoralandtibialcomponentsofkneereplacementslimitationsinreliabilityandsuitabilityforroutineclinicalpractice
AT mcnamaraiain ctmeasuresoffemoralandtibialversionandrotationalpositionoffemoralandtibialcomponentsofkneereplacementslimitationsinreliabilityandsuitabilityforroutineclinicalpractice