Cargando…
Development of COVID-19 therapies: Nonclinical testing considerations
Therapies have been developed in the last couple of years to allow vaccination against, or treatment of patients with, COVID-19 using pathways such as Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the USA and Conditional Marketing Authorization (CMA) in the EU and UK. However, nonclinical studies were perfor...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35609793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105189 |
_version_ | 1784711440183066624 |
---|---|
author | Baldrick, Paul |
author_facet | Baldrick, Paul |
author_sort | Baldrick, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Therapies have been developed in the last couple of years to allow vaccination against, or treatment of patients with, COVID-19 using pathways such as Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the USA and Conditional Marketing Authorization (CMA) in the EU and UK. However, nonclinical studies were performed to allow such authorization and these were reviewed for 6 vaccines, 7 biological (monoclonal antibodies [mAbs]) and 4 small molecule therapies to examine whether the number and types of studies normally needed for regulatory agency authorization have been reduced. Results showed that the short answer is generally no. Thus, a battery of immunogenicity/efficacy or related pharmacology/biological activity studies showing utility against SARS-CoV-2 were performed as well as general toxicity studies across all 3 compound classes along with pharmacokinetic studies for mAbs and small molecules and, reproduction toxicity testing for vaccines and small molecules; additionally, genotoxicity testing occurred for small molecules. What was different from conventional, lengthy drug development, was that for vaccines and small molecules, leverage to existing platform technology or data available for other development programs, respectively, occurred. Recognition that mAbs can target the spike protein leading to neutralization allowed rapid development into clinical candidates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9122883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91228832022-05-21 Development of COVID-19 therapies: Nonclinical testing considerations Baldrick, Paul Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Article Therapies have been developed in the last couple of years to allow vaccination against, or treatment of patients with, COVID-19 using pathways such as Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the USA and Conditional Marketing Authorization (CMA) in the EU and UK. However, nonclinical studies were performed to allow such authorization and these were reviewed for 6 vaccines, 7 biological (monoclonal antibodies [mAbs]) and 4 small molecule therapies to examine whether the number and types of studies normally needed for regulatory agency authorization have been reduced. Results showed that the short answer is generally no. Thus, a battery of immunogenicity/efficacy or related pharmacology/biological activity studies showing utility against SARS-CoV-2 were performed as well as general toxicity studies across all 3 compound classes along with pharmacokinetic studies for mAbs and small molecules and, reproduction toxicity testing for vaccines and small molecules; additionally, genotoxicity testing occurred for small molecules. What was different from conventional, lengthy drug development, was that for vaccines and small molecules, leverage to existing platform technology or data available for other development programs, respectively, occurred. Recognition that mAbs can target the spike protein leading to neutralization allowed rapid development into clinical candidates. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-07 2022-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9122883/ /pubmed/35609793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105189 Text en Crown Copyright © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Baldrick, Paul Development of COVID-19 therapies: Nonclinical testing considerations |
title | Development of COVID-19 therapies: Nonclinical testing considerations |
title_full | Development of COVID-19 therapies: Nonclinical testing considerations |
title_fullStr | Development of COVID-19 therapies: Nonclinical testing considerations |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of COVID-19 therapies: Nonclinical testing considerations |
title_short | Development of COVID-19 therapies: Nonclinical testing considerations |
title_sort | development of covid-19 therapies: nonclinical testing considerations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35609793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baldrickpaul developmentofcovid19therapiesnonclinicaltestingconsiderations |