Cargando…
The influence of sea ice on the detection of bowhead whale calls
Bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) face threats from diminishing sea ice and increasing anthropogenic activities in the Arctic. Passive acoustic monitoring is the most effective means for monitoring their distribution and population trends, based on the detection of their calls. Passive acoustic mo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35595792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12186-5 |
_version_ | 1784711463452016640 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Joshua M. Hildebrand, John A. Thayre, Bruce J. Jameson, Ellen Small, Robert J. Wiggins, Sean M. |
author_facet | Jones, Joshua M. Hildebrand, John A. Thayre, Bruce J. Jameson, Ellen Small, Robert J. Wiggins, Sean M. |
author_sort | Jones, Joshua M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) face threats from diminishing sea ice and increasing anthropogenic activities in the Arctic. Passive acoustic monitoring is the most effective means for monitoring their distribution and population trends, based on the detection of their calls. Passive acoustic monitoring, however, is influenced by the sound propagation environment and ambient noise levels, which impact call detection probability. Modeling and simulations were used to estimate detection probability for bowhead whale frequency-modulated calls in the 80–180 Hz frequency band with and without sea ice cover and under various noise conditions. Sound transmission loss for bowhead calls is substantially greater during ice-covered conditions than during open-water conditions, making call detection ~ 3 times more likely in open-water. Estimates of daily acoustic detection probability were used to compensate acoustic detections for sound propagation and noise effects in two recording datasets in the northeast Chukchi Sea, on the outer shelf and continental slope, collected between 2012 and 2013. The compensated acoustic density suggests a decrease in whale presence with the retreat of sea ice at these recording sites. These results highlight the importance of accounting for effects of the environment on ambient noise and acoustic propagation when interpreting results of passive acoustic monitoring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9122979 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91229792022-05-22 The influence of sea ice on the detection of bowhead whale calls Jones, Joshua M. Hildebrand, John A. Thayre, Bruce J. Jameson, Ellen Small, Robert J. Wiggins, Sean M. Sci Rep Article Bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) face threats from diminishing sea ice and increasing anthropogenic activities in the Arctic. Passive acoustic monitoring is the most effective means for monitoring their distribution and population trends, based on the detection of their calls. Passive acoustic monitoring, however, is influenced by the sound propagation environment and ambient noise levels, which impact call detection probability. Modeling and simulations were used to estimate detection probability for bowhead whale frequency-modulated calls in the 80–180 Hz frequency band with and without sea ice cover and under various noise conditions. Sound transmission loss for bowhead calls is substantially greater during ice-covered conditions than during open-water conditions, making call detection ~ 3 times more likely in open-water. Estimates of daily acoustic detection probability were used to compensate acoustic detections for sound propagation and noise effects in two recording datasets in the northeast Chukchi Sea, on the outer shelf and continental slope, collected between 2012 and 2013. The compensated acoustic density suggests a decrease in whale presence with the retreat of sea ice at these recording sites. These results highlight the importance of accounting for effects of the environment on ambient noise and acoustic propagation when interpreting results of passive acoustic monitoring. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9122979/ /pubmed/35595792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12186-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Jones, Joshua M. Hildebrand, John A. Thayre, Bruce J. Jameson, Ellen Small, Robert J. Wiggins, Sean M. The influence of sea ice on the detection of bowhead whale calls |
title | The influence of sea ice on the detection of bowhead whale calls |
title_full | The influence of sea ice on the detection of bowhead whale calls |
title_fullStr | The influence of sea ice on the detection of bowhead whale calls |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of sea ice on the detection of bowhead whale calls |
title_short | The influence of sea ice on the detection of bowhead whale calls |
title_sort | influence of sea ice on the detection of bowhead whale calls |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35595792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12186-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesjoshuam theinfluenceofseaiceonthedetectionofbowheadwhalecalls AT hildebrandjohna theinfluenceofseaiceonthedetectionofbowheadwhalecalls AT thayrebrucej theinfluenceofseaiceonthedetectionofbowheadwhalecalls AT jamesonellen theinfluenceofseaiceonthedetectionofbowheadwhalecalls AT smallrobertj theinfluenceofseaiceonthedetectionofbowheadwhalecalls AT wigginsseanm theinfluenceofseaiceonthedetectionofbowheadwhalecalls AT jonesjoshuam influenceofseaiceonthedetectionofbowheadwhalecalls AT hildebrandjohna influenceofseaiceonthedetectionofbowheadwhalecalls AT thayrebrucej influenceofseaiceonthedetectionofbowheadwhalecalls AT jamesonellen influenceofseaiceonthedetectionofbowheadwhalecalls AT smallrobertj influenceofseaiceonthedetectionofbowheadwhalecalls AT wigginsseanm influenceofseaiceonthedetectionofbowheadwhalecalls |