Cargando…

Dosing Regimens of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema Beyond the First Year: VIOLET, a Prospective Randomized Trial

INTRODUCTION: The purpose was to compare two flexible regimens of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) with fixed dosing every 8 weeks, beyond the first year of treatment, in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). VIOLET was a 100-week, randomized, Phase IIIb, non-inferiority study in patients wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garweg, Justus G., Štefanickova, Jana, Hoyng, Carel, Niesen, Tobias, Schmelter, Thomas, Leal, Sergio, Sivaprasad, Sobha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35412227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02119-z
_version_ 1784711477295316992
author Garweg, Justus G.
Štefanickova, Jana
Hoyng, Carel
Niesen, Tobias
Schmelter, Thomas
Leal, Sergio
Sivaprasad, Sobha
author_facet Garweg, Justus G.
Štefanickova, Jana
Hoyng, Carel
Niesen, Tobias
Schmelter, Thomas
Leal, Sergio
Sivaprasad, Sobha
author_sort Garweg, Justus G.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The purpose was to compare two flexible regimens of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) with fixed dosing every 8 weeks, beyond the first year of treatment, in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). VIOLET was a 100-week, randomized, Phase IIIb, non-inferiority study in patients with center-involving DME previously treated with IVT-AFL for ≥ 1 year according to the European label. METHODS: Patients received an initial dose of IVT-AFL at study baseline and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to treat-and-extend (T&E), pro re nata (PRN), or fixed regimens. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline (randomization) to Week 52. RESULTS: Full analysis set comprised 458 patients (baseline mean BCVA: 72.5, 71.0, and 72.7 letters in the T&E, PRN, and fixed-dose groups, respectively). Patients received a mean (min–max) of 10.0 (2–14; T&E), 11.5 (1–25; PRN), and 12.3 (3–13; fixed) injections over 100 weeks, with 13.3 (4–23), 25.0 (3–29), and 16.1 (5–25) clinic visits, respectively. At Week 52, mean (± standard deviation) BCVA changes from baseline were + 0.5 ± 6.7 (T&E), + 1.7 ± 6.8 (PRN), and + 0.4 ± 6.7 (fixed-dosing) letters (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval]: T&E 0.01 [− 1.46, 1.47] and PRN 0.95 (− 0.52, 2.42) letters versus fixed dosing; p < 0.0001 for both non-inferiority tests [4-letter margin]). The IVT-AFL safety profile was consistent with previous studies. CONCLUSION: The treatment burden associated with intravitreal injections for DME is lowest with T&E regimens, but there are a range of flexible IVT-AFL dosing regimens, allowing physicians to adopt an individualized treatment plan. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02818998. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02119-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9123040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91230402022-05-22 Dosing Regimens of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema Beyond the First Year: VIOLET, a Prospective Randomized Trial Garweg, Justus G. Štefanickova, Jana Hoyng, Carel Niesen, Tobias Schmelter, Thomas Leal, Sergio Sivaprasad, Sobha Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The purpose was to compare two flexible regimens of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) with fixed dosing every 8 weeks, beyond the first year of treatment, in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). VIOLET was a 100-week, randomized, Phase IIIb, non-inferiority study in patients with center-involving DME previously treated with IVT-AFL for ≥ 1 year according to the European label. METHODS: Patients received an initial dose of IVT-AFL at study baseline and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to treat-and-extend (T&E), pro re nata (PRN), or fixed regimens. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline (randomization) to Week 52. RESULTS: Full analysis set comprised 458 patients (baseline mean BCVA: 72.5, 71.0, and 72.7 letters in the T&E, PRN, and fixed-dose groups, respectively). Patients received a mean (min–max) of 10.0 (2–14; T&E), 11.5 (1–25; PRN), and 12.3 (3–13; fixed) injections over 100 weeks, with 13.3 (4–23), 25.0 (3–29), and 16.1 (5–25) clinic visits, respectively. At Week 52, mean (± standard deviation) BCVA changes from baseline were + 0.5 ± 6.7 (T&E), + 1.7 ± 6.8 (PRN), and + 0.4 ± 6.7 (fixed-dosing) letters (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval]: T&E 0.01 [− 1.46, 1.47] and PRN 0.95 (− 0.52, 2.42) letters versus fixed dosing; p < 0.0001 for both non-inferiority tests [4-letter margin]). The IVT-AFL safety profile was consistent with previous studies. CONCLUSION: The treatment burden associated with intravitreal injections for DME is lowest with T&E regimens, but there are a range of flexible IVT-AFL dosing regimens, allowing physicians to adopt an individualized treatment plan. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02818998. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02119-z. Springer Healthcare 2022-04-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9123040/ /pubmed/35412227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02119-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Garweg, Justus G.
Štefanickova, Jana
Hoyng, Carel
Niesen, Tobias
Schmelter, Thomas
Leal, Sergio
Sivaprasad, Sobha
Dosing Regimens of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema Beyond the First Year: VIOLET, a Prospective Randomized Trial
title Dosing Regimens of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema Beyond the First Year: VIOLET, a Prospective Randomized Trial
title_full Dosing Regimens of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema Beyond the First Year: VIOLET, a Prospective Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Dosing Regimens of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema Beyond the First Year: VIOLET, a Prospective Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Dosing Regimens of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema Beyond the First Year: VIOLET, a Prospective Randomized Trial
title_short Dosing Regimens of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema Beyond the First Year: VIOLET, a Prospective Randomized Trial
title_sort dosing regimens of intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema beyond the first year: violet, a prospective randomized trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35412227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02119-z
work_keys_str_mv AT garwegjustusg dosingregimensofintravitrealafliberceptfordiabeticmacularedemabeyondthefirstyearvioletaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT stefanickovajana dosingregimensofintravitrealafliberceptfordiabeticmacularedemabeyondthefirstyearvioletaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT hoyngcarel dosingregimensofintravitrealafliberceptfordiabeticmacularedemabeyondthefirstyearvioletaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT niesentobias dosingregimensofintravitrealafliberceptfordiabeticmacularedemabeyondthefirstyearvioletaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT schmelterthomas dosingregimensofintravitrealafliberceptfordiabeticmacularedemabeyondthefirstyearvioletaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT lealsergio dosingregimensofintravitrealafliberceptfordiabeticmacularedemabeyondthefirstyearvioletaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT sivaprasadsobha dosingregimensofintravitrealafliberceptfordiabeticmacularedemabeyondthefirstyearvioletaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT dosingregimensofintravitrealafliberceptfordiabeticmacularedemabeyondthefirstyearvioletaprospectiverandomizedtrial