Cargando…
Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets
To investigate the influence of different pretreatment methods, attachment materials and artificial aging on shear bond strength (SBS) between monolithic zirconia and metal brackets. Zirconia substrates were pretreated with silica coated alumina (CoJet) and (1) clearfill ceramic primer plus (CF), (2...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35595815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12542-5 |
_version_ | 1784711499130863616 |
---|---|
author | Jungbauer, Rebecca Proff, Peter Edelhoff, Daniel Stawarczyk, Bogna |
author_facet | Jungbauer, Rebecca Proff, Peter Edelhoff, Daniel Stawarczyk, Bogna |
author_sort | Jungbauer, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | To investigate the influence of different pretreatment methods, attachment materials and artificial aging on shear bond strength (SBS) between monolithic zirconia and metal brackets. Zirconia substrates were pretreated with silica coated alumina (CoJet) and (1) clearfill ceramic primer plus (CF), (2) RelyX ceramic primer (RXP), (3) Futurabond U (FU). The brackets were bonded with (1) Transbond XT Adhesive (TB), (2) BrackFix Adhesive (BF), (3) bracepaste adhesive (BP). SBS was tested after 24 h, 500 thermal cycles, 90 d at 37 °C with a universal testing machine. SBS values reached from 8.3 to 16.9 MPa. The Weibull moduli ranged between 0.37 (RXP combined with BP after 90 d) and 7.42 (CF combined with TB after 24 h). The pretreatment with FU after 90 d, independent of the attachment material, and RXP with BF resulted in the lowest SBS values 8.3–9.9 MPa, the combination of RXP or CF with TB showed the highest (13.2–16.9 MPa) independent of aging. After FU pretreatment the proportion of ARI 1 and 0 was higher, of ARI 3 lower as after CF and RXP pretreatment. All tested combinations showed sufficiently high SBS values for clinical use. Pretreatment with FU presented the lowest values after 90 days. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9123180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91231802022-05-22 Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets Jungbauer, Rebecca Proff, Peter Edelhoff, Daniel Stawarczyk, Bogna Sci Rep Article To investigate the influence of different pretreatment methods, attachment materials and artificial aging on shear bond strength (SBS) between monolithic zirconia and metal brackets. Zirconia substrates were pretreated with silica coated alumina (CoJet) and (1) clearfill ceramic primer plus (CF), (2) RelyX ceramic primer (RXP), (3) Futurabond U (FU). The brackets were bonded with (1) Transbond XT Adhesive (TB), (2) BrackFix Adhesive (BF), (3) bracepaste adhesive (BP). SBS was tested after 24 h, 500 thermal cycles, 90 d at 37 °C with a universal testing machine. SBS values reached from 8.3 to 16.9 MPa. The Weibull moduli ranged between 0.37 (RXP combined with BP after 90 d) and 7.42 (CF combined with TB after 24 h). The pretreatment with FU after 90 d, independent of the attachment material, and RXP with BF resulted in the lowest SBS values 8.3–9.9 MPa, the combination of RXP or CF with TB showed the highest (13.2–16.9 MPa) independent of aging. After FU pretreatment the proportion of ARI 1 and 0 was higher, of ARI 3 lower as after CF and RXP pretreatment. All tested combinations showed sufficiently high SBS values for clinical use. Pretreatment with FU presented the lowest values after 90 days. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9123180/ /pubmed/35595815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12542-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Jungbauer, Rebecca Proff, Peter Edelhoff, Daniel Stawarczyk, Bogna Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets |
title | Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets |
title_full | Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets |
title_fullStr | Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets |
title_short | Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets |
title_sort | impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35595815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12542-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jungbauerrebecca impactofdifferentpretreatmentsandattachmentmaterialsonshearbondstrengthbetweenmonolithiczirconiarestorationsandmetalbrackets AT proffpeter impactofdifferentpretreatmentsandattachmentmaterialsonshearbondstrengthbetweenmonolithiczirconiarestorationsandmetalbrackets AT edelhoffdaniel impactofdifferentpretreatmentsandattachmentmaterialsonshearbondstrengthbetweenmonolithiczirconiarestorationsandmetalbrackets AT stawarczykbogna impactofdifferentpretreatmentsandattachmentmaterialsonshearbondstrengthbetweenmonolithiczirconiarestorationsandmetalbrackets |