Cargando…

Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets

To investigate the influence of different pretreatment methods, attachment materials and artificial aging on shear bond strength (SBS) between monolithic zirconia and metal brackets. Zirconia substrates were pretreated with silica coated alumina (CoJet) and (1) clearfill ceramic primer plus (CF), (2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jungbauer, Rebecca, Proff, Peter, Edelhoff, Daniel, Stawarczyk, Bogna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35595815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12542-5
_version_ 1784711499130863616
author Jungbauer, Rebecca
Proff, Peter
Edelhoff, Daniel
Stawarczyk, Bogna
author_facet Jungbauer, Rebecca
Proff, Peter
Edelhoff, Daniel
Stawarczyk, Bogna
author_sort Jungbauer, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description To investigate the influence of different pretreatment methods, attachment materials and artificial aging on shear bond strength (SBS) between monolithic zirconia and metal brackets. Zirconia substrates were pretreated with silica coated alumina (CoJet) and (1) clearfill ceramic primer plus (CF), (2) RelyX ceramic primer (RXP), (3) Futurabond U (FU). The brackets were bonded with (1) Transbond XT Adhesive (TB), (2) BrackFix Adhesive (BF), (3) bracepaste adhesive (BP). SBS was tested after 24 h, 500 thermal cycles, 90 d at 37 °C with a universal testing machine. SBS values reached from 8.3 to 16.9 MPa. The Weibull moduli ranged between 0.37 (RXP combined with BP after 90 d) and 7.42 (CF combined with TB after 24 h). The pretreatment with FU after 90 d, independent of the attachment material, and RXP with BF resulted in the lowest SBS values 8.3–9.9 MPa, the combination of RXP or CF with TB showed the highest (13.2–16.9 MPa) independent of aging. After FU pretreatment the proportion of ARI 1 and 0 was higher, of ARI 3 lower as after CF and RXP pretreatment. All tested combinations showed sufficiently high SBS values for clinical use. Pretreatment with FU presented the lowest values after 90 days.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9123180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91231802022-05-22 Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets Jungbauer, Rebecca Proff, Peter Edelhoff, Daniel Stawarczyk, Bogna Sci Rep Article To investigate the influence of different pretreatment methods, attachment materials and artificial aging on shear bond strength (SBS) between monolithic zirconia and metal brackets. Zirconia substrates were pretreated with silica coated alumina (CoJet) and (1) clearfill ceramic primer plus (CF), (2) RelyX ceramic primer (RXP), (3) Futurabond U (FU). The brackets were bonded with (1) Transbond XT Adhesive (TB), (2) BrackFix Adhesive (BF), (3) bracepaste adhesive (BP). SBS was tested after 24 h, 500 thermal cycles, 90 d at 37 °C with a universal testing machine. SBS values reached from 8.3 to 16.9 MPa. The Weibull moduli ranged between 0.37 (RXP combined with BP after 90 d) and 7.42 (CF combined with TB after 24 h). The pretreatment with FU after 90 d, independent of the attachment material, and RXP with BF resulted in the lowest SBS values 8.3–9.9 MPa, the combination of RXP or CF with TB showed the highest (13.2–16.9 MPa) independent of aging. After FU pretreatment the proportion of ARI 1 and 0 was higher, of ARI 3 lower as after CF and RXP pretreatment. All tested combinations showed sufficiently high SBS values for clinical use. Pretreatment with FU presented the lowest values after 90 days. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9123180/ /pubmed/35595815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12542-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Jungbauer, Rebecca
Proff, Peter
Edelhoff, Daniel
Stawarczyk, Bogna
Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets
title Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets
title_full Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets
title_fullStr Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets
title_full_unstemmed Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets
title_short Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets
title_sort impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35595815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12542-5
work_keys_str_mv AT jungbauerrebecca impactofdifferentpretreatmentsandattachmentmaterialsonshearbondstrengthbetweenmonolithiczirconiarestorationsandmetalbrackets
AT proffpeter impactofdifferentpretreatmentsandattachmentmaterialsonshearbondstrengthbetweenmonolithiczirconiarestorationsandmetalbrackets
AT edelhoffdaniel impactofdifferentpretreatmentsandattachmentmaterialsonshearbondstrengthbetweenmonolithiczirconiarestorationsandmetalbrackets
AT stawarczykbogna impactofdifferentpretreatmentsandattachmentmaterialsonshearbondstrengthbetweenmonolithiczirconiarestorationsandmetalbrackets