Cargando…
Characterization of Apparently Paradoxical Thyrotropin Binding Inhibitory Immunoglobulins With Neutral Bioactivity
CONTEXT: The thyrotropin (TSH) receptor (TSH-R) autoantibody activity is clinically measured by inhibition of labeled ligand (TSH or M22) binding to the TSH-R (TSH-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin [TBII]) or by stimulation (TSH-R stimulating antibody [TSAb]) or inhibition (TSH-R blocking antibody [...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35611323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac070 |
Sumario: | CONTEXT: The thyrotropin (TSH) receptor (TSH-R) autoantibody activity is clinically measured by inhibition of labeled ligand (TSH or M22) binding to the TSH-R (TSH-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin [TBII]) or by stimulation (TSH-R stimulating antibody [TSAb]) or inhibition (TSH-R blocking antibody [TSBAb]) of 3′,5′-cyclic adenosine 5′-monophosphate (cAMP) production in isolated cells. OBJECTIVE: We experienced a patient with hypothyroid Graves disease (GD) having strong positive TBII but with almost neutral bioactivities on the TSH-R. The aim of this study is the characterization of this apparently paradoxical TBII (serum sample S). METHODS: We first compared the TBII, TSAb, and TSBAb activities of serum sample S with mixtures of stimulating (S-mAb) and blocking monoclonal Ab (B-mAb). Next, we serially measured cAMPs stimulated by various serum samples in the presence or absence of TSH. RESULTS: Mixtures of S-mAb and B-mAb did not reproduce the characteristics of serum sample S. Instead, serum sample S had a unique feature that blocked the TSH-stimulated cAMP initially but disappeared the blocking activity thereafter to reach the control level. CONCLUSION: We present here the TBIIs with neutral bioactivities found in the patient with autoimmune thyroid disease, which strongly inhibit TSH binding to the TSH-R but exerts neither TSAb nor TSBAb activity. Differences in the methods of detecting TRAb between TBII in vitro and bioassay may cause the discrepancy. Although serum sample S may be an extreme example, a variety of TRAb that not only stimulates or blocks but also interferes with TSH-R binding for only a short time may exist in the serum samples of GD patients. |
---|