Cargando…

Transmission routes of antibiotic resistant bacteria: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Quantification of acquisition routes of antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) is pivotal for understanding transmission dynamics and designing cost-effective interventions. Different methods have been used to quantify the importance of transmission routes, such as relative risks, odds rati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Godijk, Noortje G., Bootsma, Martin C. J., Bonten, Marc J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35596134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07360-z
_version_ 1784711601636507648
author Godijk, Noortje G.
Bootsma, Martin C. J.
Bonten, Marc J. M.
author_facet Godijk, Noortje G.
Bootsma, Martin C. J.
Bonten, Marc J. M.
author_sort Godijk, Noortje G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quantification of acquisition routes of antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) is pivotal for understanding transmission dynamics and designing cost-effective interventions. Different methods have been used to quantify the importance of transmission routes, such as relative risks, odds ratios (OR), genomic comparisons and basic reproduction numbers. We systematically reviewed reported estimates on acquisition routes’ contributions of ARB in humans, animals, water and the environment and assessed the methods used to quantify the importance of transmission routes. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched, resulting in 6054 articles published up until January 1st, 2019. Full text screening was performed on 525 articles and 277 are included. RESULTS: We extracted 718 estimates with S. aureus (n = 273), E. coli (n = 157) and Enterobacteriaceae (n = 99) being studied most frequently. Most estimates were derived from statistical methods (n = 560), mainly expressed as risks (n = 246) and ORs (n = 239), followed by genetic comparisons (n = 85), modelling (n = 62) and dosage of ARB ingested (n = 17). Transmission routes analysed most frequently were occupational exposure (n = 157), travelling (n = 110) and contacts with carriers (n = 83). Studies were mostly performed in the United States (n = 142), the Netherlands (n = 87) and Germany (n = 60). Comparison of methods was not possible as studies using different methods to estimate the same route were lacking. Due to study heterogeneity not all estimates by the same method could be pooled. CONCLUSION: Despite an abundance of published data the relative importance of transmission routes of ARB has not been accurately quantified. Links between exposure and acquisition are often present, but the frequency of exposure is missing, which disables estimation of transmission routes’ importance. To create effective policies reducing ARB, estimates of transmission should be weighed by the frequency of exposure occurrence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07360-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9123679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91236792022-05-22 Transmission routes of antibiotic resistant bacteria: a systematic review Godijk, Noortje G. Bootsma, Martin C. J. Bonten, Marc J. M. BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Quantification of acquisition routes of antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) is pivotal for understanding transmission dynamics and designing cost-effective interventions. Different methods have been used to quantify the importance of transmission routes, such as relative risks, odds ratios (OR), genomic comparisons and basic reproduction numbers. We systematically reviewed reported estimates on acquisition routes’ contributions of ARB in humans, animals, water and the environment and assessed the methods used to quantify the importance of transmission routes. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched, resulting in 6054 articles published up until January 1st, 2019. Full text screening was performed on 525 articles and 277 are included. RESULTS: We extracted 718 estimates with S. aureus (n = 273), E. coli (n = 157) and Enterobacteriaceae (n = 99) being studied most frequently. Most estimates were derived from statistical methods (n = 560), mainly expressed as risks (n = 246) and ORs (n = 239), followed by genetic comparisons (n = 85), modelling (n = 62) and dosage of ARB ingested (n = 17). Transmission routes analysed most frequently were occupational exposure (n = 157), travelling (n = 110) and contacts with carriers (n = 83). Studies were mostly performed in the United States (n = 142), the Netherlands (n = 87) and Germany (n = 60). Comparison of methods was not possible as studies using different methods to estimate the same route were lacking. Due to study heterogeneity not all estimates by the same method could be pooled. CONCLUSION: Despite an abundance of published data the relative importance of transmission routes of ARB has not been accurately quantified. Links between exposure and acquisition are often present, but the frequency of exposure is missing, which disables estimation of transmission routes’ importance. To create effective policies reducing ARB, estimates of transmission should be weighed by the frequency of exposure occurrence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07360-z. BioMed Central 2022-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9123679/ /pubmed/35596134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07360-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Godijk, Noortje G.
Bootsma, Martin C. J.
Bonten, Marc J. M.
Transmission routes of antibiotic resistant bacteria: a systematic review
title Transmission routes of antibiotic resistant bacteria: a systematic review
title_full Transmission routes of antibiotic resistant bacteria: a systematic review
title_fullStr Transmission routes of antibiotic resistant bacteria: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Transmission routes of antibiotic resistant bacteria: a systematic review
title_short Transmission routes of antibiotic resistant bacteria: a systematic review
title_sort transmission routes of antibiotic resistant bacteria: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35596134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07360-z
work_keys_str_mv AT godijknoortjeg transmissionroutesofantibioticresistantbacteriaasystematicreview
AT bootsmamartincj transmissionroutesofantibioticresistantbacteriaasystematicreview
AT bontenmarcjm transmissionroutesofantibioticresistantbacteriaasystematicreview