Cargando…
Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic()
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: In response to COVID-19, our institution implemented three virtual readout systems: a commercial HIPAA compliant web-based video conferencing platform used for screen-sharing (Starleaf), an interactive control sharing system integrated into PACS allowing simultaneous multi-...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35643045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.05.006 |
_version_ | 1784711633297211392 |
---|---|
author | Tannenbaum, Melissa F. Shenoy-Bhangle, Anuradha Brook, Alexander Berkowitz, Seth Chang, Yu-Ming |
author_facet | Tannenbaum, Melissa F. Shenoy-Bhangle, Anuradha Brook, Alexander Berkowitz, Seth Chang, Yu-Ming |
author_sort | Tannenbaum, Melissa F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: In response to COVID-19, our institution implemented three virtual readout systems: a commercial HIPAA compliant web-based video conferencing platform used for screen-sharing (Starleaf), an interactive control sharing system integrated into PACS allowing simultaneous multi-user mouse control over images (Collaborate), and the telephone. Our aim was to assess overall satisfaction with and perceived effectiveness of these virtual readout methods to optimize best practices for the future. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IRB-exempt survey was electronically distributed to 64 trainees and 76 attendings at one tertiary-care institution via Survey Monkey. Questions focused on overall satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, technical difficulties, and continued future use of the three virtual readout strategies. Answers were collected with Likert scales, tick boxes, and open-ended questions. RESULTS: 32/64 trainees (50%) and 32/76 attendings (42%) completed the survey. Trainees and attendings were more satisfied with screen sharing (Starleaf) and perceived it more effective than control sharing (Collaborate) or the telephone (p < 0.0001). Respondents experienced more technical difficulties with control sharing versus screen sharing (p = 0.0004) with a negative correlation between level of technical difficulties and satisfaction with screen sharing (r = −0.50, p < 0.0001) and control sharing (r = −0.38, p = 0.0006). Trainees and faculty supported a combination of in-person and virtual readouts in the future (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Platforms mirroring in-person readouts, such as Starleaf, are preferred by both trainees and attendings over non-screen sharing platforms such as the telephone. However, technical stability determines satisfaction between similar platforms. Both trainees and attendings support incorporation of virtual readout methods in combination with traditional in-person readouts in the post-COVID-19 era. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9123824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91238242022-05-21 Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic() Tannenbaum, Melissa F. Shenoy-Bhangle, Anuradha Brook, Alexander Berkowitz, Seth Chang, Yu-Ming Clin Imaging Patients & Practice, Policy & Education RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: In response to COVID-19, our institution implemented three virtual readout systems: a commercial HIPAA compliant web-based video conferencing platform used for screen-sharing (Starleaf), an interactive control sharing system integrated into PACS allowing simultaneous multi-user mouse control over images (Collaborate), and the telephone. Our aim was to assess overall satisfaction with and perceived effectiveness of these virtual readout methods to optimize best practices for the future. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IRB-exempt survey was electronically distributed to 64 trainees and 76 attendings at one tertiary-care institution via Survey Monkey. Questions focused on overall satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, technical difficulties, and continued future use of the three virtual readout strategies. Answers were collected with Likert scales, tick boxes, and open-ended questions. RESULTS: 32/64 trainees (50%) and 32/76 attendings (42%) completed the survey. Trainees and attendings were more satisfied with screen sharing (Starleaf) and perceived it more effective than control sharing (Collaborate) or the telephone (p < 0.0001). Respondents experienced more technical difficulties with control sharing versus screen sharing (p = 0.0004) with a negative correlation between level of technical difficulties and satisfaction with screen sharing (r = −0.50, p < 0.0001) and control sharing (r = −0.38, p = 0.0006). Trainees and faculty supported a combination of in-person and virtual readouts in the future (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Platforms mirroring in-person readouts, such as Starleaf, are preferred by both trainees and attendings over non-screen sharing platforms such as the telephone. However, technical stability determines satisfaction between similar platforms. Both trainees and attendings support incorporation of virtual readout methods in combination with traditional in-person readouts in the post-COVID-19 era. Elsevier Inc. 2022-08 2022-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9123824/ /pubmed/35643045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.05.006 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Patients & Practice, Policy & Education Tannenbaum, Melissa F. Shenoy-Bhangle, Anuradha Brook, Alexander Berkowitz, Seth Chang, Yu-Ming Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic() |
title | Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic() |
title_full | Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic() |
title_fullStr | Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic() |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic() |
title_short | Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic() |
title_sort | radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the covid-19 pandemic() |
topic | Patients & Practice, Policy & Education |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35643045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.05.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tannenbaummelissaf radiologytraineeandattendingsatisfactionwithvirtualreadoutsduringthecovid19pandemic AT shenoybhangleanuradha radiologytraineeandattendingsatisfactionwithvirtualreadoutsduringthecovid19pandemic AT brookalexander radiologytraineeandattendingsatisfactionwithvirtualreadoutsduringthecovid19pandemic AT berkowitzseth radiologytraineeandattendingsatisfactionwithvirtualreadoutsduringthecovid19pandemic AT changyuming radiologytraineeandattendingsatisfactionwithvirtualreadoutsduringthecovid19pandemic |