Cargando…

Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic()

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: In response to COVID-19, our institution implemented three virtual readout systems: a commercial HIPAA compliant web-based video conferencing platform used for screen-sharing (Starleaf), an interactive control sharing system integrated into PACS allowing simultaneous multi-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tannenbaum, Melissa F., Shenoy-Bhangle, Anuradha, Brook, Alexander, Berkowitz, Seth, Chang, Yu-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35643045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.05.006
_version_ 1784711633297211392
author Tannenbaum, Melissa F.
Shenoy-Bhangle, Anuradha
Brook, Alexander
Berkowitz, Seth
Chang, Yu-Ming
author_facet Tannenbaum, Melissa F.
Shenoy-Bhangle, Anuradha
Brook, Alexander
Berkowitz, Seth
Chang, Yu-Ming
author_sort Tannenbaum, Melissa F.
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: In response to COVID-19, our institution implemented three virtual readout systems: a commercial HIPAA compliant web-based video conferencing platform used for screen-sharing (Starleaf), an interactive control sharing system integrated into PACS allowing simultaneous multi-user mouse control over images (Collaborate), and the telephone. Our aim was to assess overall satisfaction with and perceived effectiveness of these virtual readout methods to optimize best practices for the future. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IRB-exempt survey was electronically distributed to 64 trainees and 76 attendings at one tertiary-care institution via Survey Monkey. Questions focused on overall satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, technical difficulties, and continued future use of the three virtual readout strategies. Answers were collected with Likert scales, tick boxes, and open-ended questions. RESULTS: 32/64 trainees (50%) and 32/76 attendings (42%) completed the survey. Trainees and attendings were more satisfied with screen sharing (Starleaf) and perceived it more effective than control sharing (Collaborate) or the telephone (p < 0.0001). Respondents experienced more technical difficulties with control sharing versus screen sharing (p = 0.0004) with a negative correlation between level of technical difficulties and satisfaction with screen sharing (r = −0.50, p < 0.0001) and control sharing (r = −0.38, p = 0.0006). Trainees and faculty supported a combination of in-person and virtual readouts in the future (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Platforms mirroring in-person readouts, such as Starleaf, are preferred by both trainees and attendings over non-screen sharing platforms such as the telephone. However, technical stability determines satisfaction between similar platforms. Both trainees and attendings support incorporation of virtual readout methods in combination with traditional in-person readouts in the post-COVID-19 era.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9123824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91238242022-05-21 Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic() Tannenbaum, Melissa F. Shenoy-Bhangle, Anuradha Brook, Alexander Berkowitz, Seth Chang, Yu-Ming Clin Imaging Patients & Practice, Policy & Education RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: In response to COVID-19, our institution implemented three virtual readout systems: a commercial HIPAA compliant web-based video conferencing platform used for screen-sharing (Starleaf), an interactive control sharing system integrated into PACS allowing simultaneous multi-user mouse control over images (Collaborate), and the telephone. Our aim was to assess overall satisfaction with and perceived effectiveness of these virtual readout methods to optimize best practices for the future. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IRB-exempt survey was electronically distributed to 64 trainees and 76 attendings at one tertiary-care institution via Survey Monkey. Questions focused on overall satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, technical difficulties, and continued future use of the three virtual readout strategies. Answers were collected with Likert scales, tick boxes, and open-ended questions. RESULTS: 32/64 trainees (50%) and 32/76 attendings (42%) completed the survey. Trainees and attendings were more satisfied with screen sharing (Starleaf) and perceived it more effective than control sharing (Collaborate) or the telephone (p < 0.0001). Respondents experienced more technical difficulties with control sharing versus screen sharing (p = 0.0004) with a negative correlation between level of technical difficulties and satisfaction with screen sharing (r = −0.50, p < 0.0001) and control sharing (r = −0.38, p = 0.0006). Trainees and faculty supported a combination of in-person and virtual readouts in the future (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Platforms mirroring in-person readouts, such as Starleaf, are preferred by both trainees and attendings over non-screen sharing platforms such as the telephone. However, technical stability determines satisfaction between similar platforms. Both trainees and attendings support incorporation of virtual readout methods in combination with traditional in-person readouts in the post-COVID-19 era. Elsevier Inc. 2022-08 2022-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9123824/ /pubmed/35643045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.05.006 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Patients & Practice, Policy & Education
Tannenbaum, Melissa F.
Shenoy-Bhangle, Anuradha
Brook, Alexander
Berkowitz, Seth
Chang, Yu-Ming
Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic()
title Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic()
title_full Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic()
title_fullStr Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic()
title_full_unstemmed Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic()
title_short Radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the COVID-19 pandemic()
title_sort radiology trainee and attending satisfaction with virtual readouts during the covid-19 pandemic()
topic Patients & Practice, Policy & Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35643045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.05.006
work_keys_str_mv AT tannenbaummelissaf radiologytraineeandattendingsatisfactionwithvirtualreadoutsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT shenoybhangleanuradha radiologytraineeandattendingsatisfactionwithvirtualreadoutsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT brookalexander radiologytraineeandattendingsatisfactionwithvirtualreadoutsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT berkowitzseth radiologytraineeandattendingsatisfactionwithvirtualreadoutsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT changyuming radiologytraineeandattendingsatisfactionwithvirtualreadoutsduringthecovid19pandemic