Cargando…

A Hybrid-Telerehabilitation Versus a Conventional Program for Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Trial during COVID-19 Pandemic

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a hybrid telerehabilitation program with a traditional face to face model in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and mixed incontinence (MUI) with a predominance of SUI. The authors hypothesized that home pelvic f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santiago, Mariana, Cardoso-Teixeira, Pedro, Pereira, Sofia, Firmino-Machado, João, Moreira, Susana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35596802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05108-6
_version_ 1784711641981517824
author Santiago, Mariana
Cardoso-Teixeira, Pedro
Pereira, Sofia
Firmino-Machado, João
Moreira, Susana
author_facet Santiago, Mariana
Cardoso-Teixeira, Pedro
Pereira, Sofia
Firmino-Machado, João
Moreira, Susana
author_sort Santiago, Mariana
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a hybrid telerehabilitation program with a traditional face to face model in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and mixed incontinence (MUI) with a predominance of SUI. The authors hypothesized that home pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) would have a similar benefit to outpatient PFMT. METHODS: Parallel randomized controlled trial including 58 patients consecutively admitted to a tertiary academic hospital for pelvic floor rehabilitation consultation from 1 January to 30 April 2021 for conservative treatment of UI. Participants randomized to the intervention were submitted to a 12-week PFMT program: (1) a hybrid telerehabilitation program of two individual face-to-face sessions followed by 2-weekly sessions of video-telerehabilitation with a follow-up by a specialized physiotherapist, including one individual face-to-face session at 8 weeks; (2) a re-evaluation teleconsultation at 6 and 16 weeks; (3) a face-to-face consultation at 12 weeks. The control group had two initial individual sessions followed by twice-weekly group classes, and consultations were face to face. The primary outcome measure (at baseline and 12 weeks) was UI-related quality of life using the Portuguese Version of the King's Health Questionnaire. RESULTS: At baseline the intervention (n = 18) and control (n = 17) groups were similar. UI-related quality of life significantly improved in both the intervention and control groups betweenbaseline (T0) and the end of the 12-week PFMT program (T12) (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively), although the magnitude of the improvement was not significantly different between groups (–10.0 vs. –9.5 points, p = 0.918, respectively). CONCLUSION: This hybrid telerehabilitation protocol showed effectiveness comparable to the traditional model in improving UI-related quality of life. Trial registration at www.ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT05114395.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9123872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91238722022-05-21 A Hybrid-Telerehabilitation Versus a Conventional Program for Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Trial during COVID-19 Pandemic Santiago, Mariana Cardoso-Teixeira, Pedro Pereira, Sofia Firmino-Machado, João Moreira, Susana Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a hybrid telerehabilitation program with a traditional face to face model in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and mixed incontinence (MUI) with a predominance of SUI. The authors hypothesized that home pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) would have a similar benefit to outpatient PFMT. METHODS: Parallel randomized controlled trial including 58 patients consecutively admitted to a tertiary academic hospital for pelvic floor rehabilitation consultation from 1 January to 30 April 2021 for conservative treatment of UI. Participants randomized to the intervention were submitted to a 12-week PFMT program: (1) a hybrid telerehabilitation program of two individual face-to-face sessions followed by 2-weekly sessions of video-telerehabilitation with a follow-up by a specialized physiotherapist, including one individual face-to-face session at 8 weeks; (2) a re-evaluation teleconsultation at 6 and 16 weeks; (3) a face-to-face consultation at 12 weeks. The control group had two initial individual sessions followed by twice-weekly group classes, and consultations were face to face. The primary outcome measure (at baseline and 12 weeks) was UI-related quality of life using the Portuguese Version of the King's Health Questionnaire. RESULTS: At baseline the intervention (n = 18) and control (n = 17) groups were similar. UI-related quality of life significantly improved in both the intervention and control groups betweenbaseline (T0) and the end of the 12-week PFMT program (T12) (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively), although the magnitude of the improvement was not significantly different between groups (–10.0 vs. –9.5 points, p = 0.918, respectively). CONCLUSION: This hybrid telerehabilitation protocol showed effectiveness comparable to the traditional model in improving UI-related quality of life. Trial registration at www.ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT05114395. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9123872/ /pubmed/35596802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05108-6 Text en © The International Urogynecological Association 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Santiago, Mariana
Cardoso-Teixeira, Pedro
Pereira, Sofia
Firmino-Machado, João
Moreira, Susana
A Hybrid-Telerehabilitation Versus a Conventional Program for Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Trial during COVID-19 Pandemic
title A Hybrid-Telerehabilitation Versus a Conventional Program for Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Trial during COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full A Hybrid-Telerehabilitation Versus a Conventional Program for Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Trial during COVID-19 Pandemic
title_fullStr A Hybrid-Telerehabilitation Versus a Conventional Program for Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Trial during COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed A Hybrid-Telerehabilitation Versus a Conventional Program for Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Trial during COVID-19 Pandemic
title_short A Hybrid-Telerehabilitation Versus a Conventional Program for Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Trial during COVID-19 Pandemic
title_sort hybrid-telerehabilitation versus a conventional program for urinary incontinence: a randomized trial during covid-19 pandemic
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35596802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05108-6
work_keys_str_mv AT santiagomariana ahybridtelerehabilitationversusaconventionalprogramforurinaryincontinencearandomizedtrialduringcovid19pandemic
AT cardosoteixeirapedro ahybridtelerehabilitationversusaconventionalprogramforurinaryincontinencearandomizedtrialduringcovid19pandemic
AT pereirasofia ahybridtelerehabilitationversusaconventionalprogramforurinaryincontinencearandomizedtrialduringcovid19pandemic
AT firminomachadojoao ahybridtelerehabilitationversusaconventionalprogramforurinaryincontinencearandomizedtrialduringcovid19pandemic
AT moreirasusana ahybridtelerehabilitationversusaconventionalprogramforurinaryincontinencearandomizedtrialduringcovid19pandemic
AT santiagomariana hybridtelerehabilitationversusaconventionalprogramforurinaryincontinencearandomizedtrialduringcovid19pandemic
AT cardosoteixeirapedro hybridtelerehabilitationversusaconventionalprogramforurinaryincontinencearandomizedtrialduringcovid19pandemic
AT pereirasofia hybridtelerehabilitationversusaconventionalprogramforurinaryincontinencearandomizedtrialduringcovid19pandemic
AT firminomachadojoao hybridtelerehabilitationversusaconventionalprogramforurinaryincontinencearandomizedtrialduringcovid19pandemic
AT moreirasusana hybridtelerehabilitationversusaconventionalprogramforurinaryincontinencearandomizedtrialduringcovid19pandemic