Cargando…

Handcycling with concurrent lower body low-frequency electromyostimulation significantly increases acute oxygen uptake: implications for rehabilitation and prevention

BACKGROUND: Acute increases in exercise-induced oxygen uptake (V̇O(2)) is crucial for aerobic training adaptations and depends on how much muscle mass is involved during exercising. Thus, handcycling is per se limited for higher maximal oxygen uptakes (V̇O(2)max) due to restricted muscle involvement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rappelt, Ludwig, Held, Steffen, Donath, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35607449
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13333
_version_ 1784711644726689792
author Rappelt, Ludwig
Held, Steffen
Donath, Lars
author_facet Rappelt, Ludwig
Held, Steffen
Donath, Lars
author_sort Rappelt, Ludwig
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute increases in exercise-induced oxygen uptake (V̇O(2)) is crucial for aerobic training adaptations and depends on how much muscle mass is involved during exercising. Thus, handcycling is per se limited for higher maximal oxygen uptakes (V̇O(2)max) due to restricted muscle involvement. Handcycling with additional and simultaneous application of low-frequency electromyostimulation (EMS) to the lower extremities might be a promising stimulus to improve aerobic capacity in disabled and rehabilitative populations. METHOD: Twenty-six healthy young adults (13 female, age: 23.4 ± 4.5 years, height: 1.77 ± 0.09 m, mass: 71.7 ± 16.7 kg) completed 4 ×10 minutes of sitting (SIT), sitting with concurrent EMS (EMS_SIT), handcycling (60 rpm, 1/2 bodyweight as resistance in watts) (HANDCYCLE) and handcycling with concurrent EMS of the lower extremities (EMS_HANDCYCLE). During EMS_SIT and EMS_HANDCYCLE, low frequency EMS (impulse frequency: 4Hz, impulse width: 350 µs, continuous stimulation) was applied to gluteal, quadriceps and calf muscles. The stimulation intensity was selected so that the perceived pain could be sustained for a duration of 10 minutes (gluteus: 80.0 ± 22.7 mA, quadriceps: 94.5 ± 20.5 mA, calves: 77.5 ± 19.1 mA). RESULTS: Significant mode-dependent changes of V̇O(2) were found (p < 0.001, η(p)(2) = 0.852). Subsequent post-hoc testing indicated significant difference between SIT vs. EMS_SIT (4.70 ± 0.75 vs. 10.61 ± 4.28 ml min(−1) kg(−1), p < 0.001), EMS_SIT vs. HANDCYCLE (10.61 ± 4.28 vs. 13.52 ± 1.40 ml min(−1) kg(−1), p = 0.005), and between HANDCYCLE vs. EMS_HANDCYCLE (13.52 ± 1.40 vs. 18.98 ± 4.89 ml min(−1) kg(−1), p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Handcycling with simultaneous lower body low-frequency EMS application elicits notably higher oxygen uptake during rest and moderately loaded handcycling and may serve as an additional cardiocirculatory training stimuli for improvements in aerobic capacity in wheelchair and rehabilitation settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9123886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91238862022-05-22 Handcycling with concurrent lower body low-frequency electromyostimulation significantly increases acute oxygen uptake: implications for rehabilitation and prevention Rappelt, Ludwig Held, Steffen Donath, Lars PeerJ Sports Injury BACKGROUND: Acute increases in exercise-induced oxygen uptake (V̇O(2)) is crucial for aerobic training adaptations and depends on how much muscle mass is involved during exercising. Thus, handcycling is per se limited for higher maximal oxygen uptakes (V̇O(2)max) due to restricted muscle involvement. Handcycling with additional and simultaneous application of low-frequency electromyostimulation (EMS) to the lower extremities might be a promising stimulus to improve aerobic capacity in disabled and rehabilitative populations. METHOD: Twenty-six healthy young adults (13 female, age: 23.4 ± 4.5 years, height: 1.77 ± 0.09 m, mass: 71.7 ± 16.7 kg) completed 4 ×10 minutes of sitting (SIT), sitting with concurrent EMS (EMS_SIT), handcycling (60 rpm, 1/2 bodyweight as resistance in watts) (HANDCYCLE) and handcycling with concurrent EMS of the lower extremities (EMS_HANDCYCLE). During EMS_SIT and EMS_HANDCYCLE, low frequency EMS (impulse frequency: 4Hz, impulse width: 350 µs, continuous stimulation) was applied to gluteal, quadriceps and calf muscles. The stimulation intensity was selected so that the perceived pain could be sustained for a duration of 10 minutes (gluteus: 80.0 ± 22.7 mA, quadriceps: 94.5 ± 20.5 mA, calves: 77.5 ± 19.1 mA). RESULTS: Significant mode-dependent changes of V̇O(2) were found (p < 0.001, η(p)(2) = 0.852). Subsequent post-hoc testing indicated significant difference between SIT vs. EMS_SIT (4.70 ± 0.75 vs. 10.61 ± 4.28 ml min(−1) kg(−1), p < 0.001), EMS_SIT vs. HANDCYCLE (10.61 ± 4.28 vs. 13.52 ± 1.40 ml min(−1) kg(−1), p = 0.005), and between HANDCYCLE vs. EMS_HANDCYCLE (13.52 ± 1.40 vs. 18.98 ± 4.89 ml min(−1) kg(−1), p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Handcycling with simultaneous lower body low-frequency EMS application elicits notably higher oxygen uptake during rest and moderately loaded handcycling and may serve as an additional cardiocirculatory training stimuli for improvements in aerobic capacity in wheelchair and rehabilitation settings. PeerJ Inc. 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9123886/ /pubmed/35607449 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13333 Text en ©2022 Rappelt et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Sports Injury
Rappelt, Ludwig
Held, Steffen
Donath, Lars
Handcycling with concurrent lower body low-frequency electromyostimulation significantly increases acute oxygen uptake: implications for rehabilitation and prevention
title Handcycling with concurrent lower body low-frequency electromyostimulation significantly increases acute oxygen uptake: implications for rehabilitation and prevention
title_full Handcycling with concurrent lower body low-frequency electromyostimulation significantly increases acute oxygen uptake: implications for rehabilitation and prevention
title_fullStr Handcycling with concurrent lower body low-frequency electromyostimulation significantly increases acute oxygen uptake: implications for rehabilitation and prevention
title_full_unstemmed Handcycling with concurrent lower body low-frequency electromyostimulation significantly increases acute oxygen uptake: implications for rehabilitation and prevention
title_short Handcycling with concurrent lower body low-frequency electromyostimulation significantly increases acute oxygen uptake: implications for rehabilitation and prevention
title_sort handcycling with concurrent lower body low-frequency electromyostimulation significantly increases acute oxygen uptake: implications for rehabilitation and prevention
topic Sports Injury
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35607449
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13333
work_keys_str_mv AT rappeltludwig handcyclingwithconcurrentlowerbodylowfrequencyelectromyostimulationsignificantlyincreasesacuteoxygenuptakeimplicationsforrehabilitationandprevention
AT heldsteffen handcyclingwithconcurrentlowerbodylowfrequencyelectromyostimulationsignificantlyincreasesacuteoxygenuptakeimplicationsforrehabilitationandprevention
AT donathlars handcyclingwithconcurrentlowerbodylowfrequencyelectromyostimulationsignificantlyincreasesacuteoxygenuptakeimplicationsforrehabilitationandprevention