Cargando…

Long-Term Clinical Results of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE: Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) is a minimally invasive treatment for cervical radicular pain due to a disc herniation. Preliminary results show equivalent patient-reported outcomes of PCN as compared to conventional anterior cervical discectomy. However, there is a paucity of long...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Rooij, Judith Divera, Gadjradj, Pravesh Shankar, Aukes, Hans, Groeneweg, George, Speksnijder, Caroline Margina, Huygen, Frank Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35607408
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S359512
_version_ 1784711646260756480
author de Rooij, Judith Divera
Gadjradj, Pravesh Shankar
Aukes, Hans
Groeneweg, George
Speksnijder, Caroline Margina
Huygen, Frank Johannes
author_facet de Rooij, Judith Divera
Gadjradj, Pravesh Shankar
Aukes, Hans
Groeneweg, George
Speksnijder, Caroline Margina
Huygen, Frank Johannes
author_sort de Rooij, Judith Divera
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) is a minimally invasive treatment for cervical radicular pain due to a disc herniation. Preliminary results show equivalent patient-reported outcomes of PCN as compared to conventional anterior cervical discectomy. However, there is a paucity of long-term outcome data. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to investigate the long-term clinical results of PCN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent PCN at a secondary referral center between 2010 and 2014. Before surgery and five days after surgery, numeric rating scales (NRS) for arm pain and neck pain and data on complications were collected. To determine long-term follow-up outcomes, patients were sent a questionnaire booklet containing the Core Outcome Measures Index-Neck (COMI-Neck), NRS for arm pain and neck pain, Likert-scales on patient satisfaction and questions regarding the incidence of reoperations and complications. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were collected for 158 patients. At a median follow-up of 41.5 months (interquartile range (IQR) 27.0 to 57.5), data were available for 118 patients (74.7%). At short-term follow-up, patients that underwent PCN had a mean decrease of 3.0 on the NRS for arm pain (95% CI 2.5 to 3.6) compared to baseline, while at long-term follow-up, a mean decrease of 2.8 (95% CI 1.0 to 3.6) was observed. At the long-term follow-up, 67.8% of the patients were fully recovered from all symptoms and 93.3% remained satisfied with the PCN treatment results. The reoperation rate for recurrent disc herniation was 21.4% at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: PCN appears to be a safe and effective treatment at short-term and long-term follow-up of a specific selection of cervical herniated discs, with an acceptable long-term reoperation rate. These study results suggest a potential role of PCN as a less invasive treatment option for cervical radicular pain due to a soft disc herniation, before anterior cervical discectomy should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9123892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91238922022-05-22 Long-Term Clinical Results of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study de Rooij, Judith Divera Gadjradj, Pravesh Shankar Aukes, Hans Groeneweg, George Speksnijder, Caroline Margina Huygen, Frank Johannes J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty (PCN) is a minimally invasive treatment for cervical radicular pain due to a disc herniation. Preliminary results show equivalent patient-reported outcomes of PCN as compared to conventional anterior cervical discectomy. However, there is a paucity of long-term outcome data. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to investigate the long-term clinical results of PCN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent PCN at a secondary referral center between 2010 and 2014. Before surgery and five days after surgery, numeric rating scales (NRS) for arm pain and neck pain and data on complications were collected. To determine long-term follow-up outcomes, patients were sent a questionnaire booklet containing the Core Outcome Measures Index-Neck (COMI-Neck), NRS for arm pain and neck pain, Likert-scales on patient satisfaction and questions regarding the incidence of reoperations and complications. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were collected for 158 patients. At a median follow-up of 41.5 months (interquartile range (IQR) 27.0 to 57.5), data were available for 118 patients (74.7%). At short-term follow-up, patients that underwent PCN had a mean decrease of 3.0 on the NRS for arm pain (95% CI 2.5 to 3.6) compared to baseline, while at long-term follow-up, a mean decrease of 2.8 (95% CI 1.0 to 3.6) was observed. At the long-term follow-up, 67.8% of the patients were fully recovered from all symptoms and 93.3% remained satisfied with the PCN treatment results. The reoperation rate for recurrent disc herniation was 21.4% at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: PCN appears to be a safe and effective treatment at short-term and long-term follow-up of a specific selection of cervical herniated discs, with an acceptable long-term reoperation rate. These study results suggest a potential role of PCN as a less invasive treatment option for cervical radicular pain due to a soft disc herniation, before anterior cervical discectomy should be considered. Dove 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9123892/ /pubmed/35607408 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S359512 Text en © 2022 de Rooij et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
de Rooij, Judith Divera
Gadjradj, Pravesh Shankar
Aukes, Hans
Groeneweg, George
Speksnijder, Caroline Margina
Huygen, Frank Johannes
Long-Term Clinical Results of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Long-Term Clinical Results of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Long-Term Clinical Results of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Long-Term Clinical Results of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Clinical Results of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Long-Term Clinical Results of Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort long-term clinical results of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty for cervical radicular pain: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35607408
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S359512
work_keys_str_mv AT derooijjudithdivera longtermclinicalresultsofpercutaneouscervicalnucleoplastyforcervicalradicularpainaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT gadjradjpraveshshankar longtermclinicalresultsofpercutaneouscervicalnucleoplastyforcervicalradicularpainaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT aukeshans longtermclinicalresultsofpercutaneouscervicalnucleoplastyforcervicalradicularpainaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT groeneweggeorge longtermclinicalresultsofpercutaneouscervicalnucleoplastyforcervicalradicularpainaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT speksnijdercarolinemargina longtermclinicalresultsofpercutaneouscervicalnucleoplastyforcervicalradicularpainaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT huygenfrankjohannes longtermclinicalresultsofpercutaneouscervicalnucleoplastyforcervicalradicularpainaretrospectivecohortstudy