Cargando…

Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method

PURPOSE: To ensure that the use of surgical training tools results in improvement of surgical skills, it is necessary to be able to measure and assess surgeons’ skills. We established the Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method as an evaluation tool for evaluating targeting technique. The STPO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohtake, Shinji, Makiyama, Kazuhide, Yamashita, Daisuke, Tatenuma, Tomoyuki, Yao, Masahiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35426565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02622-2
_version_ 1784711782383747072
author Ohtake, Shinji
Makiyama, Kazuhide
Yamashita, Daisuke
Tatenuma, Tomoyuki
Yao, Masahiro
author_facet Ohtake, Shinji
Makiyama, Kazuhide
Yamashita, Daisuke
Tatenuma, Tomoyuki
Yao, Masahiro
author_sort Ohtake, Shinji
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To ensure that the use of surgical training tools results in improvement of surgical skills, it is necessary to be able to measure and assess surgeons’ skills. We established the Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method as an evaluation tool for evaluating targeting technique. The STPOD method evaluates the distance from the actual movement of the forceps to the shortest linear path between two points in a short time period. We examined the effectiveness of the STPOD method as a new forceps kinematic analysis. METHODS: Six residents were categorized as novices and six urologists as experts. All participants performed box trainer training and LapPASS(®) Simulator training. During the procedure, objective scores (time, distance, and STPOD) were recorded. STPOD (Power) evaluated motion smoothness and STPOD (Stop) evaluated the stop time of the forceps. RESULTS: STPOD (Stop) on the right side of the experts was significantly lower than that of the novices in the box trainer. Furthermore, there were significant differences in the distances of left side and STPOD (Power) between the experts and the novices in the simulator. In the correlation of parameters between the box trainer and the simulator, time showed the strongest correlation, STPOD (Power) and distance showed a mild correlation. CONCLUSION: We showed the construct validity of STPOD (Power) and STPOD (Stop) using both the box trainer and the simulator. This method is a good evaluation tool for assessing a physician’s skill; however, there are much more complex motions that are performed in actual surgery. Future studies are needed to focus on evaluation in an environment closer to actual surgery and comparing with other existing methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9124661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91246612022-05-24 Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method Ohtake, Shinji Makiyama, Kazuhide Yamashita, Daisuke Tatenuma, Tomoyuki Yao, Masahiro Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: To ensure that the use of surgical training tools results in improvement of surgical skills, it is necessary to be able to measure and assess surgeons’ skills. We established the Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method as an evaluation tool for evaluating targeting technique. The STPOD method evaluates the distance from the actual movement of the forceps to the shortest linear path between two points in a short time period. We examined the effectiveness of the STPOD method as a new forceps kinematic analysis. METHODS: Six residents were categorized as novices and six urologists as experts. All participants performed box trainer training and LapPASS(®) Simulator training. During the procedure, objective scores (time, distance, and STPOD) were recorded. STPOD (Power) evaluated motion smoothness and STPOD (Stop) evaluated the stop time of the forceps. RESULTS: STPOD (Stop) on the right side of the experts was significantly lower than that of the novices in the box trainer. Furthermore, there were significant differences in the distances of left side and STPOD (Power) between the experts and the novices in the simulator. In the correlation of parameters between the box trainer and the simulator, time showed the strongest correlation, STPOD (Power) and distance showed a mild correlation. CONCLUSION: We showed the construct validity of STPOD (Power) and STPOD (Stop) using both the box trainer and the simulator. This method is a good evaluation tool for assessing a physician’s skill; however, there are much more complex motions that are performed in actual surgery. Future studies are needed to focus on evaluation in an environment closer to actual surgery and comparing with other existing methods. Springer International Publishing 2022-04-15 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9124661/ /pubmed/35426565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02622-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Ohtake, Shinji
Makiyama, Kazuhide
Yamashita, Daisuke
Tatenuma, Tomoyuki
Yao, Masahiro
Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method
title Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method
title_full Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method
title_fullStr Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method
title_full_unstemmed Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method
title_short Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method
title_sort objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a short-time power of difference (stpod) method
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35426565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02622-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ohtakeshinji objectiveassessmentoflaparoscopictargetingskillsusingashorttimepowerofdifferencestpodmethod
AT makiyamakazuhide objectiveassessmentoflaparoscopictargetingskillsusingashorttimepowerofdifferencestpodmethod
AT yamashitadaisuke objectiveassessmentoflaparoscopictargetingskillsusingashorttimepowerofdifferencestpodmethod
AT tatenumatomoyuki objectiveassessmentoflaparoscopictargetingskillsusingashorttimepowerofdifferencestpodmethod
AT yaomasahiro objectiveassessmentoflaparoscopictargetingskillsusingashorttimepowerofdifferencestpodmethod