Cargando…
Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method
PURPOSE: To ensure that the use of surgical training tools results in improvement of surgical skills, it is necessary to be able to measure and assess surgeons’ skills. We established the Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method as an evaluation tool for evaluating targeting technique. The STPO...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35426565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02622-2 |
_version_ | 1784711782383747072 |
---|---|
author | Ohtake, Shinji Makiyama, Kazuhide Yamashita, Daisuke Tatenuma, Tomoyuki Yao, Masahiro |
author_facet | Ohtake, Shinji Makiyama, Kazuhide Yamashita, Daisuke Tatenuma, Tomoyuki Yao, Masahiro |
author_sort | Ohtake, Shinji |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To ensure that the use of surgical training tools results in improvement of surgical skills, it is necessary to be able to measure and assess surgeons’ skills. We established the Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method as an evaluation tool for evaluating targeting technique. The STPOD method evaluates the distance from the actual movement of the forceps to the shortest linear path between two points in a short time period. We examined the effectiveness of the STPOD method as a new forceps kinematic analysis. METHODS: Six residents were categorized as novices and six urologists as experts. All participants performed box trainer training and LapPASS(®) Simulator training. During the procedure, objective scores (time, distance, and STPOD) were recorded. STPOD (Power) evaluated motion smoothness and STPOD (Stop) evaluated the stop time of the forceps. RESULTS: STPOD (Stop) on the right side of the experts was significantly lower than that of the novices in the box trainer. Furthermore, there were significant differences in the distances of left side and STPOD (Power) between the experts and the novices in the simulator. In the correlation of parameters between the box trainer and the simulator, time showed the strongest correlation, STPOD (Power) and distance showed a mild correlation. CONCLUSION: We showed the construct validity of STPOD (Power) and STPOD (Stop) using both the box trainer and the simulator. This method is a good evaluation tool for assessing a physician’s skill; however, there are much more complex motions that are performed in actual surgery. Future studies are needed to focus on evaluation in an environment closer to actual surgery and comparing with other existing methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9124661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91246612022-05-24 Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method Ohtake, Shinji Makiyama, Kazuhide Yamashita, Daisuke Tatenuma, Tomoyuki Yao, Masahiro Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: To ensure that the use of surgical training tools results in improvement of surgical skills, it is necessary to be able to measure and assess surgeons’ skills. We established the Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method as an evaluation tool for evaluating targeting technique. The STPOD method evaluates the distance from the actual movement of the forceps to the shortest linear path between two points in a short time period. We examined the effectiveness of the STPOD method as a new forceps kinematic analysis. METHODS: Six residents were categorized as novices and six urologists as experts. All participants performed box trainer training and LapPASS(®) Simulator training. During the procedure, objective scores (time, distance, and STPOD) were recorded. STPOD (Power) evaluated motion smoothness and STPOD (Stop) evaluated the stop time of the forceps. RESULTS: STPOD (Stop) on the right side of the experts was significantly lower than that of the novices in the box trainer. Furthermore, there were significant differences in the distances of left side and STPOD (Power) between the experts and the novices in the simulator. In the correlation of parameters between the box trainer and the simulator, time showed the strongest correlation, STPOD (Power) and distance showed a mild correlation. CONCLUSION: We showed the construct validity of STPOD (Power) and STPOD (Stop) using both the box trainer and the simulator. This method is a good evaluation tool for assessing a physician’s skill; however, there are much more complex motions that are performed in actual surgery. Future studies are needed to focus on evaluation in an environment closer to actual surgery and comparing with other existing methods. Springer International Publishing 2022-04-15 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9124661/ /pubmed/35426565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02622-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ohtake, Shinji Makiyama, Kazuhide Yamashita, Daisuke Tatenuma, Tomoyuki Yao, Masahiro Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method |
title | Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method |
title_full | Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method |
title_fullStr | Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method |
title_full_unstemmed | Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method |
title_short | Objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a Short-Time Power of Difference (STPOD) method |
title_sort | objective assessment of laparoscopic targeting skills using a short-time power of difference (stpod) method |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35426565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02622-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohtakeshinji objectiveassessmentoflaparoscopictargetingskillsusingashorttimepowerofdifferencestpodmethod AT makiyamakazuhide objectiveassessmentoflaparoscopictargetingskillsusingashorttimepowerofdifferencestpodmethod AT yamashitadaisuke objectiveassessmentoflaparoscopictargetingskillsusingashorttimepowerofdifferencestpodmethod AT tatenumatomoyuki objectiveassessmentoflaparoscopictargetingskillsusingashorttimepowerofdifferencestpodmethod AT yaomasahiro objectiveassessmentoflaparoscopictargetingskillsusingashorttimepowerofdifferencestpodmethod |