Cargando…

Mobile Stroke Unit Operational Metrics: Institutional Experience, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The available literature on mobile stroke units (MSU) has focused on clinical outcomes, rather than operational performance. Our objective was to establish normalized metrics and to conduct a meta-analysis of the current literature on MSU performance. METHODS: Our MSU in upstate New York...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellens, Nathaniel R., Schartz, Derrek, Rahmani, Redi, Akkipeddi, Sajal Medha K., Kelly, Adam G., Benesch, Curtis G., Parker, Stephanie A., Burgett, Jason L., Proper, Diana, Pilcher, Webster H., Mattingly, Thomas K., Grotta, James C., Bhalla, Tarun, Bender, Matthew T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35614916
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.868051
_version_ 1784711808736559104
author Ellens, Nathaniel R.
Schartz, Derrek
Rahmani, Redi
Akkipeddi, Sajal Medha K.
Kelly, Adam G.
Benesch, Curtis G.
Parker, Stephanie A.
Burgett, Jason L.
Proper, Diana
Pilcher, Webster H.
Mattingly, Thomas K.
Grotta, James C.
Bhalla, Tarun
Bender, Matthew T.
author_facet Ellens, Nathaniel R.
Schartz, Derrek
Rahmani, Redi
Akkipeddi, Sajal Medha K.
Kelly, Adam G.
Benesch, Curtis G.
Parker, Stephanie A.
Burgett, Jason L.
Proper, Diana
Pilcher, Webster H.
Mattingly, Thomas K.
Grotta, James C.
Bhalla, Tarun
Bender, Matthew T.
author_sort Ellens, Nathaniel R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The available literature on mobile stroke units (MSU) has focused on clinical outcomes, rather than operational performance. Our objective was to establish normalized metrics and to conduct a meta-analysis of the current literature on MSU performance. METHODS: Our MSU in upstate New York serves 741,000 people. We present prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed data from the inception of our MSU in October of 2018, through March of 2021. Rates of transportation/dispatch and MSU utilization were reported. We also performed a meta-analysis using MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases, calculating rates of tPA/dispatch, tPA-per-24-operational-hours (“per day”), mechanical thrombectomy (MT)/dispatch and MT/day. RESULTS: Our MSU was dispatched 1,719 times in 606 days (8.5 dispatches/24-operational-hours) and transported 324 patients (18.8%) to the hospital. Intravenous tPA was administered in 64 patients (3.7% of dispatches) and the rate of tPA/day was 0.317 (95% CI 0.150–0.567). MT was performed in 24 patients (1.4% of dispatches) for a MT/day rate of 0.119 (95% CI 0.074–0.163). The MSU was in use for 38,742 minutes out of 290,760 total available minutes (13.3% utilization rate). Our meta-analysis included 14 articles. Eight studies were included in the analysis of tPA/dispatch (342/5,862) for a rate of 7.2% (95% CI 4.8–9.5%, I(2) = 92%) and 11 were included in the analysis of tPA/day (1,858/4,961) for a rate of 0.358 (95% CI 0.215–0.502, I(2) = 99%). Seven studies were included for MT/dispatch (102/5,335) for a rate of 2.0% (95% CI 1.2–2.8%, I(2) = 67%) and MT/day (103/1,249) for a rate of 0.092 (95% CI 0.046–0.138, I(2) = 91%). CONCLUSIONS: In this single institution retrospective study and meta-analysis, we outline the following operational metrics: tPA/dispatch, tPA/day, MT/dispatch, MT/day, and utilization rate. These metrics are useful for internal and external comparison for institutions with or considering developing mobile stroke programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9124821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91248212022-05-24 Mobile Stroke Unit Operational Metrics: Institutional Experience, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Ellens, Nathaniel R. Schartz, Derrek Rahmani, Redi Akkipeddi, Sajal Medha K. Kelly, Adam G. Benesch, Curtis G. Parker, Stephanie A. Burgett, Jason L. Proper, Diana Pilcher, Webster H. Mattingly, Thomas K. Grotta, James C. Bhalla, Tarun Bender, Matthew T. Front Neurol Neurology BACKGROUND: The available literature on mobile stroke units (MSU) has focused on clinical outcomes, rather than operational performance. Our objective was to establish normalized metrics and to conduct a meta-analysis of the current literature on MSU performance. METHODS: Our MSU in upstate New York serves 741,000 people. We present prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed data from the inception of our MSU in October of 2018, through March of 2021. Rates of transportation/dispatch and MSU utilization were reported. We also performed a meta-analysis using MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases, calculating rates of tPA/dispatch, tPA-per-24-operational-hours (“per day”), mechanical thrombectomy (MT)/dispatch and MT/day. RESULTS: Our MSU was dispatched 1,719 times in 606 days (8.5 dispatches/24-operational-hours) and transported 324 patients (18.8%) to the hospital. Intravenous tPA was administered in 64 patients (3.7% of dispatches) and the rate of tPA/day was 0.317 (95% CI 0.150–0.567). MT was performed in 24 patients (1.4% of dispatches) for a MT/day rate of 0.119 (95% CI 0.074–0.163). The MSU was in use for 38,742 minutes out of 290,760 total available minutes (13.3% utilization rate). Our meta-analysis included 14 articles. Eight studies were included in the analysis of tPA/dispatch (342/5,862) for a rate of 7.2% (95% CI 4.8–9.5%, I(2) = 92%) and 11 were included in the analysis of tPA/day (1,858/4,961) for a rate of 0.358 (95% CI 0.215–0.502, I(2) = 99%). Seven studies were included for MT/dispatch (102/5,335) for a rate of 2.0% (95% CI 1.2–2.8%, I(2) = 67%) and MT/day (103/1,249) for a rate of 0.092 (95% CI 0.046–0.138, I(2) = 91%). CONCLUSIONS: In this single institution retrospective study and meta-analysis, we outline the following operational metrics: tPA/dispatch, tPA/day, MT/dispatch, MT/day, and utilization rate. These metrics are useful for internal and external comparison for institutions with or considering developing mobile stroke programs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9124821/ /pubmed/35614916 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.868051 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ellens, Schartz, Rahmani, Akkipeddi, Kelly, Benesch, Parker, Burgett, Proper, Pilcher, Mattingly, Grotta, Bhalla and Bender. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Ellens, Nathaniel R.
Schartz, Derrek
Rahmani, Redi
Akkipeddi, Sajal Medha K.
Kelly, Adam G.
Benesch, Curtis G.
Parker, Stephanie A.
Burgett, Jason L.
Proper, Diana
Pilcher, Webster H.
Mattingly, Thomas K.
Grotta, James C.
Bhalla, Tarun
Bender, Matthew T.
Mobile Stroke Unit Operational Metrics: Institutional Experience, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Mobile Stroke Unit Operational Metrics: Institutional Experience, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Mobile Stroke Unit Operational Metrics: Institutional Experience, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Mobile Stroke Unit Operational Metrics: Institutional Experience, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Mobile Stroke Unit Operational Metrics: Institutional Experience, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Mobile Stroke Unit Operational Metrics: Institutional Experience, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort mobile stroke unit operational metrics: institutional experience, systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35614916
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.868051
work_keys_str_mv AT ellensnathanielr mobilestrokeunitoperationalmetricsinstitutionalexperiencesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schartzderrek mobilestrokeunitoperationalmetricsinstitutionalexperiencesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rahmaniredi mobilestrokeunitoperationalmetricsinstitutionalexperiencesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT akkipeddisajalmedhak mobilestrokeunitoperationalmetricsinstitutionalexperiencesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kellyadamg mobilestrokeunitoperationalmetricsinstitutionalexperiencesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT beneschcurtisg mobilestrokeunitoperationalmetricsinstitutionalexperiencesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT parkerstephaniea mobilestrokeunitoperationalmetricsinstitutionalexperiencesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT burgettjasonl mobilestrokeunitoperationalmetricsinstitutionalexperiencesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT properdiana mobilestrokeunitoperationalmetricsinstitutionalexperiencesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pilcherwebsterh mobilestrokeunitoperationalmetricsinstitutionalexperiencesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mattinglythomask mobilestrokeunitoperationalmetricsinstitutionalexperiencesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT grottajamesc mobilestrokeunitoperationalmetricsinstitutionalexperiencesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bhallatarun mobilestrokeunitoperationalmetricsinstitutionalexperiencesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bendermatthewt mobilestrokeunitoperationalmetricsinstitutionalexperiencesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis