Cargando…
Is the modified Dunn’s procedure superior to in situ fixation? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies for management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis
PURPOSE: The management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis is controversial. While in situ fixation is commonly used, the modified Dunn’s procedure is increasingly popular within high-volume centers. We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as the rates of fe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35615396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/18632521221078864 |
_version_ | 1784711829897871360 |
---|---|
author | Cheok, Tim Smith, Thomas Berman, Morgan Jennings, Matthew Williams, Kanishka Poonnoose, Pradeep Mathew Rawat, Jaideep Foster, Bruce |
author_facet | Cheok, Tim Smith, Thomas Berman, Morgan Jennings, Matthew Williams, Kanishka Poonnoose, Pradeep Mathew Rawat, Jaideep Foster, Bruce |
author_sort | Cheok, Tim |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis is controversial. While in situ fixation is commonly used, the modified Dunn’s procedure is increasingly popular within high-volume centers. We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as the rates of femoral head avascular necrosis or chondrolysis in patients managed with either modified Dunn’s procedure or in situ fixation. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and Web of Science was performed in August 2021. Studies comparing outcomes and complications of modified Dunn’s procedure versus in situ fixation in patients with moderate or severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis were included. RESULTS: A total of four studies were included in the final analysis. Modified Dunn’s procedure did not result in improved clinical outcomes. However, radiological outcomes as measured using Southwick angles and Alpha angles were significantly improved in the modified Dunn’s procedure group, with a mean difference of −14.68 (p < 0.00001) and −34.26 degrees (p < 0.00001), respectively, compared to in situ fixation. There was no difference in the odds of femoral head avascular necrosis or chondrolysis, with odds ratio of 0.99 (p = 0.97). CONCLUSION: Within the limits of our study, modified Dunn’s procedure did not improve clinical outcomes. There were significantly improved radiological outcomes without higher odds of femoral head avascular necrosis or chondrolysis. Further long-term studies are required to better guide management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis, especially in unstable slips. In the meantime, we recommend that the modified Dunn’s procedure, if done, be restricted to high-volume centers with low complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III—Systematic review of Level III studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NO.: CRD42021279503. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9124911 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91249112022-05-24 Is the modified Dunn’s procedure superior to in situ fixation? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies for management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis Cheok, Tim Smith, Thomas Berman, Morgan Jennings, Matthew Williams, Kanishka Poonnoose, Pradeep Mathew Rawat, Jaideep Foster, Bruce J Child Orthop Hip PURPOSE: The management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis is controversial. While in situ fixation is commonly used, the modified Dunn’s procedure is increasingly popular within high-volume centers. We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as the rates of femoral head avascular necrosis or chondrolysis in patients managed with either modified Dunn’s procedure or in situ fixation. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and Web of Science was performed in August 2021. Studies comparing outcomes and complications of modified Dunn’s procedure versus in situ fixation in patients with moderate or severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis were included. RESULTS: A total of four studies were included in the final analysis. Modified Dunn’s procedure did not result in improved clinical outcomes. However, radiological outcomes as measured using Southwick angles and Alpha angles were significantly improved in the modified Dunn’s procedure group, with a mean difference of −14.68 (p < 0.00001) and −34.26 degrees (p < 0.00001), respectively, compared to in situ fixation. There was no difference in the odds of femoral head avascular necrosis or chondrolysis, with odds ratio of 0.99 (p = 0.97). CONCLUSION: Within the limits of our study, modified Dunn’s procedure did not improve clinical outcomes. There were significantly improved radiological outcomes without higher odds of femoral head avascular necrosis or chondrolysis. Further long-term studies are required to better guide management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis, especially in unstable slips. In the meantime, we recommend that the modified Dunn’s procedure, if done, be restricted to high-volume centers with low complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III—Systematic review of Level III studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NO.: CRD42021279503. SAGE Publications 2022-04-05 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9124911/ /pubmed/35615396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/18632521221078864 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Hip Cheok, Tim Smith, Thomas Berman, Morgan Jennings, Matthew Williams, Kanishka Poonnoose, Pradeep Mathew Rawat, Jaideep Foster, Bruce Is the modified Dunn’s procedure superior to in situ fixation? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies for management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis |
title | Is the modified Dunn’s procedure superior to in situ fixation? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies for management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis |
title_full | Is the modified Dunn’s procedure superior to in situ fixation? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies for management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis |
title_fullStr | Is the modified Dunn’s procedure superior to in situ fixation? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies for management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Is the modified Dunn’s procedure superior to in situ fixation? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies for management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis |
title_short | Is the modified Dunn’s procedure superior to in situ fixation? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies for management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis |
title_sort | is the modified dunn’s procedure superior to in situ fixation? a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies for management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis |
topic | Hip |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35615396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/18632521221078864 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheoktim isthemodifieddunnsproceduresuperiortoinsitufixationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudiesformanagementofmoderateandsevereslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysis AT smiththomas isthemodifieddunnsproceduresuperiortoinsitufixationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudiesformanagementofmoderateandsevereslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysis AT bermanmorgan isthemodifieddunnsproceduresuperiortoinsitufixationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudiesformanagementofmoderateandsevereslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysis AT jenningsmatthew isthemodifieddunnsproceduresuperiortoinsitufixationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudiesformanagementofmoderateandsevereslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysis AT williamskanishka isthemodifieddunnsproceduresuperiortoinsitufixationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudiesformanagementofmoderateandsevereslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysis AT poonnoosepradeepmathew isthemodifieddunnsproceduresuperiortoinsitufixationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudiesformanagementofmoderateandsevereslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysis AT rawatjaideep isthemodifieddunnsproceduresuperiortoinsitufixationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudiesformanagementofmoderateandsevereslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysis AT fosterbruce isthemodifieddunnsproceduresuperiortoinsitufixationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativestudiesformanagementofmoderateandsevereslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysis |