Cargando…

Prophylactic fresh frozen plasma versus prothrombin complex concentrate for preprocedural management of the coagulopathy of liver disease: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: The optimal prophylactic preprocedural management of patients with coagulopathy due to liver disease is not known. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) with prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in the preprocedural management of p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Christina R., Cuker, Adam, Crowther, Mark, Pishko, Allyson M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12724
_version_ 1784711839529041920
author Evans, Christina R.
Cuker, Adam
Crowther, Mark
Pishko, Allyson M.
author_facet Evans, Christina R.
Cuker, Adam
Crowther, Mark
Pishko, Allyson M.
author_sort Evans, Christina R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal prophylactic preprocedural management of patients with coagulopathy due to liver disease is not known. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) with prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in the preprocedural management of patients with coagulopathy of liver disease. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to examine published evidence regarding treatment with FFP or PCC in adults with coagulopathy of liver disease undergoing an invasive procedure. Direct comparisons and single‐arm studies were eligible. Efficacy outcomes included major bleeding, mortality, and correction of prothrombin time (PT) and/or international normalized ratio (INR). Safety outcomes included thrombosis and transfusion‐related complications. RESULTS: A total of 95 articles were identified for full‐text review. Nine studies were eligible and included in the review. No randomized trials comparing FFP versus PCC were identified. Only two studies directly compared FFP versus PCC. In these studies, PCC appeared to result in higher rates of correction of PT/INR, but bleeding outcomes were not different. In the single‐arm studies, bleeding events appeared low overall. Volume overload was the most common recorded adverse event in patients receiving FFP. Thromboembolic events occurred rarely, but exclusively in the PCC group. Due to heterogeneity in study definitions and bias, meta‐analysis was not possible. Our study found no evidence to favor a specific product over another. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient data exist on the effects of FFP versus PCC administration before invasive procedures in patients with coagulopathy of liver disease to make conclusions with respect to relative efficacy or safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9124952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91249522022-10-05 Prophylactic fresh frozen plasma versus prothrombin complex concentrate for preprocedural management of the coagulopathy of liver disease: A systematic review Evans, Christina R. Cuker, Adam Crowther, Mark Pishko, Allyson M. Res Pract Thromb Haemost Original Articles BACKGROUND: The optimal prophylactic preprocedural management of patients with coagulopathy due to liver disease is not known. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) with prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in the preprocedural management of patients with coagulopathy of liver disease. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to examine published evidence regarding treatment with FFP or PCC in adults with coagulopathy of liver disease undergoing an invasive procedure. Direct comparisons and single‐arm studies were eligible. Efficacy outcomes included major bleeding, mortality, and correction of prothrombin time (PT) and/or international normalized ratio (INR). Safety outcomes included thrombosis and transfusion‐related complications. RESULTS: A total of 95 articles were identified for full‐text review. Nine studies were eligible and included in the review. No randomized trials comparing FFP versus PCC were identified. Only two studies directly compared FFP versus PCC. In these studies, PCC appeared to result in higher rates of correction of PT/INR, but bleeding outcomes were not different. In the single‐arm studies, bleeding events appeared low overall. Volume overload was the most common recorded adverse event in patients receiving FFP. Thromboembolic events occurred rarely, but exclusively in the PCC group. Due to heterogeneity in study definitions and bias, meta‐analysis was not possible. Our study found no evidence to favor a specific product over another. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient data exist on the effects of FFP versus PCC administration before invasive procedures in patients with coagulopathy of liver disease to make conclusions with respect to relative efficacy or safety. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9124952/ /pubmed/36204546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12724 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Evans, Christina R.
Cuker, Adam
Crowther, Mark
Pishko, Allyson M.
Prophylactic fresh frozen plasma versus prothrombin complex concentrate for preprocedural management of the coagulopathy of liver disease: A systematic review
title Prophylactic fresh frozen plasma versus prothrombin complex concentrate for preprocedural management of the coagulopathy of liver disease: A systematic review
title_full Prophylactic fresh frozen plasma versus prothrombin complex concentrate for preprocedural management of the coagulopathy of liver disease: A systematic review
title_fullStr Prophylactic fresh frozen plasma versus prothrombin complex concentrate for preprocedural management of the coagulopathy of liver disease: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Prophylactic fresh frozen plasma versus prothrombin complex concentrate for preprocedural management of the coagulopathy of liver disease: A systematic review
title_short Prophylactic fresh frozen plasma versus prothrombin complex concentrate for preprocedural management of the coagulopathy of liver disease: A systematic review
title_sort prophylactic fresh frozen plasma versus prothrombin complex concentrate for preprocedural management of the coagulopathy of liver disease: a systematic review
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12724
work_keys_str_mv AT evanschristinar prophylacticfreshfrozenplasmaversusprothrombincomplexconcentrateforpreproceduralmanagementofthecoagulopathyofliverdiseaseasystematicreview
AT cukeradam prophylacticfreshfrozenplasmaversusprothrombincomplexconcentrateforpreproceduralmanagementofthecoagulopathyofliverdiseaseasystematicreview
AT crowthermark prophylacticfreshfrozenplasmaversusprothrombincomplexconcentrateforpreproceduralmanagementofthecoagulopathyofliverdiseaseasystematicreview
AT pishkoallysonm prophylacticfreshfrozenplasmaversusprothrombincomplexconcentrateforpreproceduralmanagementofthecoagulopathyofliverdiseaseasystematicreview