Cargando…
The Application Value of the Renal Region of Interest Corrected by Computed Tomography in Single-Kidney Glomerular Filtration Rate for the Evaluation of Patients With Moderate or Severe Hydronephrosis
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the application value of the renal region of interest (ROI) corrected by computed tomography (CT) in single-kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with hydronephrosis. Methods: A total of 46 patients with hydronephrosis were divided into four g...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35615674 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.861895 |
Sumario: | Objective: This study aimed to investigate the application value of the renal region of interest (ROI) corrected by computed tomography (CT) in single-kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with hydronephrosis. Methods: A total of 46 patients with hydronephrosis were divided into four groups based on their degree of unilateral hydronephrosis: a normal group (left kidney and right kidney) and three abnormal groups (mild, moderate, and severe hydronephrosis). GFR was measured using the two-sample method (tGFR). The single-kidney GFR of each patient was derived from differential renal function values in dynamic renal imaging multiplied by GFR. The single-kidney GFRs, including GFR from the Gates method (gGFR(single)) and CT area-corrected GFR (aGFR(single)), were compared with tGFR(single). A paired-sample t-test and Pearson’s test were used for data analysis. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There were no significant differences between aGFR(single) and tGFR(single) in patients in the normal, mild hydronephrosis, and moderate hydronephrosis groups (t = –0.604∼1.982, all p > 0.05), but there was a significant difference between them in the severe hydronephrosis group (t = 2.302, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between gGFR(single) and tGFR(single) in the normal and mild hydronephrosis groups (t = 0.194∼0.962, all p > 0.05), but there was a significant difference between them in the moderate and severe hydronephrosis groups (t = 3.321, 3.494, p < 0.05). Both gGFR(single) and aGFR(single) were correlated with tGFR(single), with aGFR(single) being more strongly correlated (r = 0.890, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In patients with moderate hydronephrosis, aGFR(single) is more strongly correlated with tGFR(single) than gGFR(single). However, in patients with severe hydronephrosis and accompanying renal morphological changes, the aGFR(single) measured by the renal ROI area-correction method using CT has higher accuracy and better clinical application value than the conventional gGFR(single). |
---|