Cargando…

Investigating Abiotic and Biotic Mechanisms of Pyrite Reduction

Pyrite (FeS(2)) has a very low solubility and therefore has historically been considered a sink for iron (Fe) and sulfur (S) and unavailable to biology in the absence of oxygen and oxidative weathering. Anaerobic methanogens were recently shown to reduce FeS(2) and assimilate Fe and S reduction prod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spietz, Rachel L., Payne, Devon, Kulkarni, Gargi, Metcalf, William W., Roden, Eric E., Boyd, Eric S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35615515
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.878387
_version_ 1784711845154652160
author Spietz, Rachel L.
Payne, Devon
Kulkarni, Gargi
Metcalf, William W.
Roden, Eric E.
Boyd, Eric S.
author_facet Spietz, Rachel L.
Payne, Devon
Kulkarni, Gargi
Metcalf, William W.
Roden, Eric E.
Boyd, Eric S.
author_sort Spietz, Rachel L.
collection PubMed
description Pyrite (FeS(2)) has a very low solubility and therefore has historically been considered a sink for iron (Fe) and sulfur (S) and unavailable to biology in the absence of oxygen and oxidative weathering. Anaerobic methanogens were recently shown to reduce FeS(2) and assimilate Fe and S reduction products to meet nutrient demands. However, the mechanism of FeS(2) mineral reduction and the forms of Fe and S assimilated by methanogens remained unclear. Thermodynamic calculations described herein indicate that H(2) at aqueous concentrations as low as 10(–10) M favors the reduction of FeS(2), with sulfide (HS(–)) and pyrrhotite (Fe(1–)(x)S) as products; abiotic laboratory experiments confirmed the reduction of FeS(2) with dissolved H(2) concentrations greater than 1.98 × 10(–4) M H(2). Growth studies of Methanosarcina barkeri provided with FeS(2) as the sole source of Fe and S resulted in H(2) production but at concentrations too low to drive abiotic FeS(2) reduction, based on abiotic laboratory experimental data. A strain of M. barkeri with deletions in all [NiFe]-hydrogenases maintained the ability to reduce FeS(2) during growth, providing further evidence that extracellular electron transport (EET) to FeS(2) does not involve H(2) or [NiFe]-hydrogenases. Physical contact between cells and FeS(2) was required for mineral reduction but was not required to obtain Fe and S from dissolution products. The addition of a synthetic electron shuttle, anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate, allowed for biological reduction of FeS(2) when physical contact between cells and FeS(2) was prohibited, indicating that exogenous electron shuttles can mediate FeS(2) reduction. Transcriptomics experiments revealed upregulation of several cytoplasmic oxidoreductases during growth of M. barkeri on FeS(2), which may indicate involvement in provisioning low potential electrons for EET to FeS(2). Collectively, the data presented herein indicate that reduction of insoluble FeS(2) by M. barkeri occurred via electron transfer from the cell surface to the mineral surface resulting in the generation of soluble HS(–) and mineral-associated Fe(1–)(x)S. Solubilized Fe(II), but not HS(–), from mineral-associated Fe(1–)(x)S reacts with aqueous HS(–) yielding aqueous iron sulfur clusters (FeS(aq)) that likely serve as the Fe and S source for methanogen growth and activity. FeS(aq) nucleation and subsequent precipitation on the surface of cells may result in accelerated EET to FeS(2), resulting in positive feedback between cell activity and FeS(2) reduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9124975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91249752022-05-24 Investigating Abiotic and Biotic Mechanisms of Pyrite Reduction Spietz, Rachel L. Payne, Devon Kulkarni, Gargi Metcalf, William W. Roden, Eric E. Boyd, Eric S. Front Microbiol Microbiology Pyrite (FeS(2)) has a very low solubility and therefore has historically been considered a sink for iron (Fe) and sulfur (S) and unavailable to biology in the absence of oxygen and oxidative weathering. Anaerobic methanogens were recently shown to reduce FeS(2) and assimilate Fe and S reduction products to meet nutrient demands. However, the mechanism of FeS(2) mineral reduction and the forms of Fe and S assimilated by methanogens remained unclear. Thermodynamic calculations described herein indicate that H(2) at aqueous concentrations as low as 10(–10) M favors the reduction of FeS(2), with sulfide (HS(–)) and pyrrhotite (Fe(1–)(x)S) as products; abiotic laboratory experiments confirmed the reduction of FeS(2) with dissolved H(2) concentrations greater than 1.98 × 10(–4) M H(2). Growth studies of Methanosarcina barkeri provided with FeS(2) as the sole source of Fe and S resulted in H(2) production but at concentrations too low to drive abiotic FeS(2) reduction, based on abiotic laboratory experimental data. A strain of M. barkeri with deletions in all [NiFe]-hydrogenases maintained the ability to reduce FeS(2) during growth, providing further evidence that extracellular electron transport (EET) to FeS(2) does not involve H(2) or [NiFe]-hydrogenases. Physical contact between cells and FeS(2) was required for mineral reduction but was not required to obtain Fe and S from dissolution products. The addition of a synthetic electron shuttle, anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate, allowed for biological reduction of FeS(2) when physical contact between cells and FeS(2) was prohibited, indicating that exogenous electron shuttles can mediate FeS(2) reduction. Transcriptomics experiments revealed upregulation of several cytoplasmic oxidoreductases during growth of M. barkeri on FeS(2), which may indicate involvement in provisioning low potential electrons for EET to FeS(2). Collectively, the data presented herein indicate that reduction of insoluble FeS(2) by M. barkeri occurred via electron transfer from the cell surface to the mineral surface resulting in the generation of soluble HS(–) and mineral-associated Fe(1–)(x)S. Solubilized Fe(II), but not HS(–), from mineral-associated Fe(1–)(x)S reacts with aqueous HS(–) yielding aqueous iron sulfur clusters (FeS(aq)) that likely serve as the Fe and S source for methanogen growth and activity. FeS(aq) nucleation and subsequent precipitation on the surface of cells may result in accelerated EET to FeS(2), resulting in positive feedback between cell activity and FeS(2) reduction. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9124975/ /pubmed/35615515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.878387 Text en Copyright © 2022 Spietz, Payne, Kulkarni, Metcalf, Roden and Boyd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Spietz, Rachel L.
Payne, Devon
Kulkarni, Gargi
Metcalf, William W.
Roden, Eric E.
Boyd, Eric S.
Investigating Abiotic and Biotic Mechanisms of Pyrite Reduction
title Investigating Abiotic and Biotic Mechanisms of Pyrite Reduction
title_full Investigating Abiotic and Biotic Mechanisms of Pyrite Reduction
title_fullStr Investigating Abiotic and Biotic Mechanisms of Pyrite Reduction
title_full_unstemmed Investigating Abiotic and Biotic Mechanisms of Pyrite Reduction
title_short Investigating Abiotic and Biotic Mechanisms of Pyrite Reduction
title_sort investigating abiotic and biotic mechanisms of pyrite reduction
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35615515
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.878387
work_keys_str_mv AT spietzrachell investigatingabioticandbioticmechanismsofpyritereduction
AT paynedevon investigatingabioticandbioticmechanismsofpyritereduction
AT kulkarnigargi investigatingabioticandbioticmechanismsofpyritereduction
AT metcalfwilliamw investigatingabioticandbioticmechanismsofpyritereduction
AT rodenerice investigatingabioticandbioticmechanismsofpyritereduction
AT boyderics investigatingabioticandbioticmechanismsofpyritereduction