Cargando…
Digital screening for postnatal depression: mixed methods proof-of-concept study
BACKGROUND: Depression during the postnatal year is prevalent in mothers (17%) and fathers (9%), and suicide is the leading cause of maternal death in this period. Lifelong costs and consequences of untreated postnatal depression (PND) are high due to impacts on infants as well as parents. We aimed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04756-2 |
_version_ | 1784711853418479616 |
---|---|
author | Eisner, Emily Lewis, Shôn Stockton-Powdrell, Charlotte Agass, Ria Whelan, Pauline Tower, Clare |
author_facet | Eisner, Emily Lewis, Shôn Stockton-Powdrell, Charlotte Agass, Ria Whelan, Pauline Tower, Clare |
author_sort | Eisner, Emily |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Depression during the postnatal year is prevalent in mothers (17%) and fathers (9%), and suicide is the leading cause of maternal death in this period. Lifelong costs and consequences of untreated postnatal depression (PND) are high due to impacts on infants as well as parents. We aimed to improve access to PND treatment using digital screening. We developed a smartphone app (ClinTouch DAWN-P) that allows parents to monitor their mood daily with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), uploading responses in real-time to a secure server. We evaluated the app’s feasibility, acceptability, validity and safety in a proof-of-concept study. METHODS: Pregnant women (≥ 36 weeks gestation) and partners were recruited from antenatal services and invited to complete daily EPDS assessments via the ClinTouch DAWN-P app until 6 weeks postpartum. Participants completed standard paper-based EPDS at two time points for validity comparisons. We examined app acceptability and usability at 6 weeks postpartum with qualitative interviews, examined using framework analysis, and the abridged Mobile App Rating Scale (convergent mixed methods design). RESULTS: Most (96%) eligible pregnant women approached were keen to try the app. Participating mothers (n = 15) and partners/fathers (n = 8) found the app easy to use, and 91% continued to use it for the full study period. Overall, 67% of daily app-based assessments were completed, with a history of depression predicting lower app usage. Participants suggested modifications to the app and its deployment to improve usability (e.g., extending the response window and including feedback and parenting advice). The validity of app-based responses was confirmed by high agreement with standard EPDS. App-based and paper-based ratings showed perfect agreement in identifying cases of likely PND. There were no serious adverse events relating to app use. CONCLUSIONS: Digital PND screening appears feasible, acceptable, valid and safe. It also benefits from being remotely delivered: we enrolled all participants remotely during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Use of digital screening could address known shortcomings of conventional health visitor-delivered screening such as limited staff time, parental unwillingness to disclose difficulties to a professional, lack of partner/father screening, and language barriers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04279093). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04756-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9125009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91250092022-05-23 Digital screening for postnatal depression: mixed methods proof-of-concept study Eisner, Emily Lewis, Shôn Stockton-Powdrell, Charlotte Agass, Ria Whelan, Pauline Tower, Clare BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Depression during the postnatal year is prevalent in mothers (17%) and fathers (9%), and suicide is the leading cause of maternal death in this period. Lifelong costs and consequences of untreated postnatal depression (PND) are high due to impacts on infants as well as parents. We aimed to improve access to PND treatment using digital screening. We developed a smartphone app (ClinTouch DAWN-P) that allows parents to monitor their mood daily with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), uploading responses in real-time to a secure server. We evaluated the app’s feasibility, acceptability, validity and safety in a proof-of-concept study. METHODS: Pregnant women (≥ 36 weeks gestation) and partners were recruited from antenatal services and invited to complete daily EPDS assessments via the ClinTouch DAWN-P app until 6 weeks postpartum. Participants completed standard paper-based EPDS at two time points for validity comparisons. We examined app acceptability and usability at 6 weeks postpartum with qualitative interviews, examined using framework analysis, and the abridged Mobile App Rating Scale (convergent mixed methods design). RESULTS: Most (96%) eligible pregnant women approached were keen to try the app. Participating mothers (n = 15) and partners/fathers (n = 8) found the app easy to use, and 91% continued to use it for the full study period. Overall, 67% of daily app-based assessments were completed, with a history of depression predicting lower app usage. Participants suggested modifications to the app and its deployment to improve usability (e.g., extending the response window and including feedback and parenting advice). The validity of app-based responses was confirmed by high agreement with standard EPDS. App-based and paper-based ratings showed perfect agreement in identifying cases of likely PND. There were no serious adverse events relating to app use. CONCLUSIONS: Digital PND screening appears feasible, acceptable, valid and safe. It also benefits from being remotely delivered: we enrolled all participants remotely during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Use of digital screening could address known shortcomings of conventional health visitor-delivered screening such as limited staff time, parental unwillingness to disclose difficulties to a professional, lack of partner/father screening, and language barriers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04279093). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04756-2. BioMed Central 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9125009/ /pubmed/35606731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04756-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Eisner, Emily Lewis, Shôn Stockton-Powdrell, Charlotte Agass, Ria Whelan, Pauline Tower, Clare Digital screening for postnatal depression: mixed methods proof-of-concept study |
title | Digital screening for postnatal depression: mixed methods proof-of-concept study |
title_full | Digital screening for postnatal depression: mixed methods proof-of-concept study |
title_fullStr | Digital screening for postnatal depression: mixed methods proof-of-concept study |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital screening for postnatal depression: mixed methods proof-of-concept study |
title_short | Digital screening for postnatal depression: mixed methods proof-of-concept study |
title_sort | digital screening for postnatal depression: mixed methods proof-of-concept study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04756-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eisneremily digitalscreeningforpostnataldepressionmixedmethodsproofofconceptstudy AT lewisshon digitalscreeningforpostnataldepressionmixedmethodsproofofconceptstudy AT stocktonpowdrellcharlotte digitalscreeningforpostnataldepressionmixedmethodsproofofconceptstudy AT agassria digitalscreeningforpostnataldepressionmixedmethodsproofofconceptstudy AT whelanpauline digitalscreeningforpostnataldepressionmixedmethodsproofofconceptstudy AT towerclare digitalscreeningforpostnataldepressionmixedmethodsproofofconceptstudy |