Cargando…

The Underlying Cardiovascular Mechanisms of Resuscitation and Injury of REBOA and Partial REBOA

Introduction: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is used for aortic control in hemorrhagic shock despite little quantification of its mechanism of resuscitation or cardiac injury. The goal of this study was to use pressure-volume (PV) loop analysis and direct coronary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stonko, David P., Edwards, Joseph, Abdou, Hossam, Elansary, Noha N., Lang, Eric, Savidge, Samuel G., Hicks, Caitlin W., Morrison, Jonathan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35615678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.871073
_version_ 1784711927549657088
author Stonko, David P.
Edwards, Joseph
Abdou, Hossam
Elansary, Noha N.
Lang, Eric
Savidge, Samuel G.
Hicks, Caitlin W.
Morrison, Jonathan J.
author_facet Stonko, David P.
Edwards, Joseph
Abdou, Hossam
Elansary, Noha N.
Lang, Eric
Savidge, Samuel G.
Hicks, Caitlin W.
Morrison, Jonathan J.
author_sort Stonko, David P.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is used for aortic control in hemorrhagic shock despite little quantification of its mechanism of resuscitation or cardiac injury. The goal of this study was to use pressure-volume (PV) loop analysis and direct coronary blood flow measurements to describe the physiologic changes associated with the clinical use of REBOA. Methods: Swine underwent surgical and vascular access to measure left ventricular PV loops and left coronary flow in hemorrhagic shock and subsequent placement of occlusive REBOA, partial REBOA, and no REBOA. PV loop characteristics and coronary flow are compared graphically with PV loops and coronary waveforms, and quantitatively with measures of the end systolic and end pressure volume relationship, and coronary flow parameters, with accounting for multiple comparisons. Results: Hemorrhagic shock was induced in five male swine (mean 53.6 ± 3.6 kg) as demonstrated by reduction of stroke work (baseline: 3.1 vs. shock: 1.2 L*mmHg, p < 0.01) and end systolic pressure (ESP; 109.8 vs. 59.6 mmHg, p < 0.01). ESP increased with full REBOA (178.4 mmHg; p < 0.01), but only moderately with partial REBOA (103.0 mmHg, p < 0.01 compared to shock). End systolic elastance was augmented from baseline to shock (1.01 vs. 0.39 ml/mmHg, p < 0.01) as well as shock compared to REBOA (4.50 ml/mmHg, p < 0.01) and partial REBOA (3.22 ml/mmHg, p = 0.01). Percent time in antegrade coronary flow decreased in shock (94%–71.8%, p < 0.01) but was rescued with REBOA. Peak flow increased with REBOA (271 vs. shock: 93 ml/min, p < 0.01) as did total flow (peak: 2136, baseline: 424 ml/min, p < 0.01). REBOA did not augment the end diastolic pressure volume relationship. Conclusion: REBOA increases afterload to facilitate resuscitation, but the penalty is supraphysiologic coronary flows and imposed increase in LV contractility to maintain cardiac output. Partial REBOA balances the increased afterload with improved aortic system compliance to prevent injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9125334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91253342022-05-24 The Underlying Cardiovascular Mechanisms of Resuscitation and Injury of REBOA and Partial REBOA Stonko, David P. Edwards, Joseph Abdou, Hossam Elansary, Noha N. Lang, Eric Savidge, Samuel G. Hicks, Caitlin W. Morrison, Jonathan J. Front Physiol Physiology Introduction: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is used for aortic control in hemorrhagic shock despite little quantification of its mechanism of resuscitation or cardiac injury. The goal of this study was to use pressure-volume (PV) loop analysis and direct coronary blood flow measurements to describe the physiologic changes associated with the clinical use of REBOA. Methods: Swine underwent surgical and vascular access to measure left ventricular PV loops and left coronary flow in hemorrhagic shock and subsequent placement of occlusive REBOA, partial REBOA, and no REBOA. PV loop characteristics and coronary flow are compared graphically with PV loops and coronary waveforms, and quantitatively with measures of the end systolic and end pressure volume relationship, and coronary flow parameters, with accounting for multiple comparisons. Results: Hemorrhagic shock was induced in five male swine (mean 53.6 ± 3.6 kg) as demonstrated by reduction of stroke work (baseline: 3.1 vs. shock: 1.2 L*mmHg, p < 0.01) and end systolic pressure (ESP; 109.8 vs. 59.6 mmHg, p < 0.01). ESP increased with full REBOA (178.4 mmHg; p < 0.01), but only moderately with partial REBOA (103.0 mmHg, p < 0.01 compared to shock). End systolic elastance was augmented from baseline to shock (1.01 vs. 0.39 ml/mmHg, p < 0.01) as well as shock compared to REBOA (4.50 ml/mmHg, p < 0.01) and partial REBOA (3.22 ml/mmHg, p = 0.01). Percent time in antegrade coronary flow decreased in shock (94%–71.8%, p < 0.01) but was rescued with REBOA. Peak flow increased with REBOA (271 vs. shock: 93 ml/min, p < 0.01) as did total flow (peak: 2136, baseline: 424 ml/min, p < 0.01). REBOA did not augment the end diastolic pressure volume relationship. Conclusion: REBOA increases afterload to facilitate resuscitation, but the penalty is supraphysiologic coronary flows and imposed increase in LV contractility to maintain cardiac output. Partial REBOA balances the increased afterload with improved aortic system compliance to prevent injury. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9125334/ /pubmed/35615678 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.871073 Text en Copyright © 2022 Stonko, Edwards, Abdou, Elansary, Lang, Savidge, Hicks and Morrison. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Stonko, David P.
Edwards, Joseph
Abdou, Hossam
Elansary, Noha N.
Lang, Eric
Savidge, Samuel G.
Hicks, Caitlin W.
Morrison, Jonathan J.
The Underlying Cardiovascular Mechanisms of Resuscitation and Injury of REBOA and Partial REBOA
title The Underlying Cardiovascular Mechanisms of Resuscitation and Injury of REBOA and Partial REBOA
title_full The Underlying Cardiovascular Mechanisms of Resuscitation and Injury of REBOA and Partial REBOA
title_fullStr The Underlying Cardiovascular Mechanisms of Resuscitation and Injury of REBOA and Partial REBOA
title_full_unstemmed The Underlying Cardiovascular Mechanisms of Resuscitation and Injury of REBOA and Partial REBOA
title_short The Underlying Cardiovascular Mechanisms of Resuscitation and Injury of REBOA and Partial REBOA
title_sort underlying cardiovascular mechanisms of resuscitation and injury of reboa and partial reboa
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35615678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.871073
work_keys_str_mv AT stonkodavidp theunderlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa
AT edwardsjoseph theunderlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa
AT abdouhossam theunderlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa
AT elansarynohan theunderlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa
AT langeric theunderlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa
AT savidgesamuelg theunderlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa
AT hickscaitlinw theunderlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa
AT morrisonjonathanj theunderlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa
AT stonkodavidp underlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa
AT edwardsjoseph underlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa
AT abdouhossam underlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa
AT elansarynohan underlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa
AT langeric underlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa
AT savidgesamuelg underlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa
AT hickscaitlinw underlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa
AT morrisonjonathanj underlyingcardiovascularmechanismsofresuscitationandinjuryofreboaandpartialreboa