Cargando…
Clinical analysis on diagnostic accuracy of Bosch Vivalytic SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test and evaluation of cycle threshold at admission for COVID-19 risk assessment
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care (POC) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests have the ability to improve testing efficiency in the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, real-world data on POC tests is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07447-7 |
_version_ | 1784711929005080576 |
---|---|
author | Heger, Lukas Andreas Elsen, Nils Rieder, Marina Gauchel, Nadine Sommerwerck, Urte Bode, Christoph Duerschmied, Daniel Oette, Mark Ahrens, Ingo |
author_facet | Heger, Lukas Andreas Elsen, Nils Rieder, Marina Gauchel, Nadine Sommerwerck, Urte Bode, Christoph Duerschmied, Daniel Oette, Mark Ahrens, Ingo |
author_sort | Heger, Lukas Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Point-of-care (POC) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests have the ability to improve testing efficiency in the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, real-world data on POC tests is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) POC test in a clinical setting and examine the prognostic value of cycle threshold (CT) on admission on the length of hospital stay (LOS) in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Patients hospitalised between January and May 2021 were included in this prospective cohort study. Patients’ nasopharyngeal swabs were tested for SARS-CoV-2 with Allplex™2019-nCoV (Seegene Inc.) real-time (RT) PCR assay as gold standard as well as a novel POC test (Bosch Vivalytic SARS-CoV-2 [Bosch]) and the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test (Roche) accordingly. Clinical sensitivity and specificity as well as inter- and intra-assay variability were analyzed. RESULTS: 120 patients met the inclusion criteria with 46 (38%) having a definite COVID-19 diagnosis by RT-PCR. Bosch Vivalytic SARS-CoV-2 POC had a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 96%. The inter- and intra- assay variability was below 15%. The CT value at baseline was lower in patients with LOS ≥ 10 days when compared to patients with LOS < 10 days (27.82 (± 4.648) vs. 36.2 (25.9–39.18); p = 0.0191). There was a negative correlation of CT at admission and LOS (r[44](s) = − 0.31; p = 0.038) but only age was associated with the probability of an increased LOS in a multiple logistic regression analysis (OR 1.105 [95% CI, 1.03–1.19]; p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that POC testing with Bosch Vivalytic SARS-CoV-2 is a valid strategy to identify COVID-19 patients and decrease turnaround time to definite COVID-19 diagnosis. Also, our data suggest that age at admission possibly with CT value as a combined parameter could be a promising tool for risk assessment of increased length of hospital stay and severity of disease in COVID-19 patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9125343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91253432022-05-23 Clinical analysis on diagnostic accuracy of Bosch Vivalytic SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test and evaluation of cycle threshold at admission for COVID-19 risk assessment Heger, Lukas Andreas Elsen, Nils Rieder, Marina Gauchel, Nadine Sommerwerck, Urte Bode, Christoph Duerschmied, Daniel Oette, Mark Ahrens, Ingo BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Point-of-care (POC) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests have the ability to improve testing efficiency in the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, real-world data on POC tests is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) POC test in a clinical setting and examine the prognostic value of cycle threshold (CT) on admission on the length of hospital stay (LOS) in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Patients hospitalised between January and May 2021 were included in this prospective cohort study. Patients’ nasopharyngeal swabs were tested for SARS-CoV-2 with Allplex™2019-nCoV (Seegene Inc.) real-time (RT) PCR assay as gold standard as well as a novel POC test (Bosch Vivalytic SARS-CoV-2 [Bosch]) and the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test (Roche) accordingly. Clinical sensitivity and specificity as well as inter- and intra-assay variability were analyzed. RESULTS: 120 patients met the inclusion criteria with 46 (38%) having a definite COVID-19 diagnosis by RT-PCR. Bosch Vivalytic SARS-CoV-2 POC had a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 96%. The inter- and intra- assay variability was below 15%. The CT value at baseline was lower in patients with LOS ≥ 10 days when compared to patients with LOS < 10 days (27.82 (± 4.648) vs. 36.2 (25.9–39.18); p = 0.0191). There was a negative correlation of CT at admission and LOS (r[44](s) = − 0.31; p = 0.038) but only age was associated with the probability of an increased LOS in a multiple logistic regression analysis (OR 1.105 [95% CI, 1.03–1.19]; p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that POC testing with Bosch Vivalytic SARS-CoV-2 is a valid strategy to identify COVID-19 patients and decrease turnaround time to definite COVID-19 diagnosis. Also, our data suggest that age at admission possibly with CT value as a combined parameter could be a promising tool for risk assessment of increased length of hospital stay and severity of disease in COVID-19 patients. BioMed Central 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9125343/ /pubmed/35606698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07447-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Heger, Lukas Andreas Elsen, Nils Rieder, Marina Gauchel, Nadine Sommerwerck, Urte Bode, Christoph Duerschmied, Daniel Oette, Mark Ahrens, Ingo Clinical analysis on diagnostic accuracy of Bosch Vivalytic SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test and evaluation of cycle threshold at admission for COVID-19 risk assessment |
title | Clinical analysis on diagnostic accuracy of Bosch Vivalytic SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test and evaluation of cycle threshold at admission for COVID-19 risk assessment |
title_full | Clinical analysis on diagnostic accuracy of Bosch Vivalytic SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test and evaluation of cycle threshold at admission for COVID-19 risk assessment |
title_fullStr | Clinical analysis on diagnostic accuracy of Bosch Vivalytic SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test and evaluation of cycle threshold at admission for COVID-19 risk assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical analysis on diagnostic accuracy of Bosch Vivalytic SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test and evaluation of cycle threshold at admission for COVID-19 risk assessment |
title_short | Clinical analysis on diagnostic accuracy of Bosch Vivalytic SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test and evaluation of cycle threshold at admission for COVID-19 risk assessment |
title_sort | clinical analysis on diagnostic accuracy of bosch vivalytic sars-cov-2 point-of-care test and evaluation of cycle threshold at admission for covid-19 risk assessment |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07447-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hegerlukasandreas clinicalanalysisondiagnosticaccuracyofboschvivalyticsarscov2pointofcaretestandevaluationofcyclethresholdatadmissionforcovid19riskassessment AT elsennils clinicalanalysisondiagnosticaccuracyofboschvivalyticsarscov2pointofcaretestandevaluationofcyclethresholdatadmissionforcovid19riskassessment AT riedermarina clinicalanalysisondiagnosticaccuracyofboschvivalyticsarscov2pointofcaretestandevaluationofcyclethresholdatadmissionforcovid19riskassessment AT gauchelnadine clinicalanalysisondiagnosticaccuracyofboschvivalyticsarscov2pointofcaretestandevaluationofcyclethresholdatadmissionforcovid19riskassessment AT sommerwerckurte clinicalanalysisondiagnosticaccuracyofboschvivalyticsarscov2pointofcaretestandevaluationofcyclethresholdatadmissionforcovid19riskassessment AT bodechristoph clinicalanalysisondiagnosticaccuracyofboschvivalyticsarscov2pointofcaretestandevaluationofcyclethresholdatadmissionforcovid19riskassessment AT duerschmieddaniel clinicalanalysisondiagnosticaccuracyofboschvivalyticsarscov2pointofcaretestandevaluationofcyclethresholdatadmissionforcovid19riskassessment AT oettemark clinicalanalysisondiagnosticaccuracyofboschvivalyticsarscov2pointofcaretestandevaluationofcyclethresholdatadmissionforcovid19riskassessment AT ahrensingo clinicalanalysisondiagnosticaccuracyofboschvivalyticsarscov2pointofcaretestandevaluationofcyclethresholdatadmissionforcovid19riskassessment |