Cargando…

‘That is a Ministry of Health thing’: Article 5.3 implementation in Uganda and the challenge of whole-of-government accountability

INTRODUCTION: While Uganda has made legislative progress towards implementing Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), ongoing challenges in minimising tobacco industry interference have not been adequately explored. This analysis focuses on understanding difficulties i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Male, Denis, Ralston, Rob, Nyamurungi, Kellen, Collin, Jeff
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35078911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057049
_version_ 1784711934959943680
author Male, Denis
Ralston, Rob
Nyamurungi, Kellen
Collin, Jeff
author_facet Male, Denis
Ralston, Rob
Nyamurungi, Kellen
Collin, Jeff
author_sort Male, Denis
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While Uganda has made legislative progress towards implementing Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), ongoing challenges in minimising tobacco industry interference have not been adequately explored. This analysis focuses on understanding difficulties in managing industry engagement across government ministries and in developing effective whole-of-government accountability for tobacco control. METHODS: Interviews with Uganda government officials within the health sector and beyond, including in Ministries of Trade, Agriculture and Revenue. RESULTS: The findings indicate substantial variations in awareness of Article 5.3, its norm and practices across government sectors. The data suggest ambiguity and uncertainty about accountability for Article 5.3 implementation, with policy makers in departments beyond health often uncertain about obligations under the FCTC. Second, we highlight how responsibility for Article 5.3 implementation and the obligations incurred are widely seen as restricted to the Ministry of Health. Third, competing mandates and perceived difficulties in reconciling health goals with economic growth are shown to impact on accountability for tobacco control. Yet, importantly, the data also demonstrate enthusiasm in some unexpected parts of government for actively engaging with Article 5.3 and for promoting greater intersectoral coordination. CONCLUSION: This paper demonstrates the intrinsic challenges of developing whole-of-government approaches, highlighting considerable uncertainty and ambiguity among decision makers in Uganda about tobacco control governance. The analysis points to the potential for Uganda’s national coordinating mechanism to help reconcile competing expectations and demonstrate the importance of Article 5.3 beyond health actors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9125367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91253672022-06-04 ‘That is a Ministry of Health thing’: Article 5.3 implementation in Uganda and the challenge of whole-of-government accountability Male, Denis Ralston, Rob Nyamurungi, Kellen Collin, Jeff Tob Control Original Research INTRODUCTION: While Uganda has made legislative progress towards implementing Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), ongoing challenges in minimising tobacco industry interference have not been adequately explored. This analysis focuses on understanding difficulties in managing industry engagement across government ministries and in developing effective whole-of-government accountability for tobacco control. METHODS: Interviews with Uganda government officials within the health sector and beyond, including in Ministries of Trade, Agriculture and Revenue. RESULTS: The findings indicate substantial variations in awareness of Article 5.3, its norm and practices across government sectors. The data suggest ambiguity and uncertainty about accountability for Article 5.3 implementation, with policy makers in departments beyond health often uncertain about obligations under the FCTC. Second, we highlight how responsibility for Article 5.3 implementation and the obligations incurred are widely seen as restricted to the Ministry of Health. Third, competing mandates and perceived difficulties in reconciling health goals with economic growth are shown to impact on accountability for tobacco control. Yet, importantly, the data also demonstrate enthusiasm in some unexpected parts of government for actively engaging with Article 5.3 and for promoting greater intersectoral coordination. CONCLUSION: This paper demonstrates the intrinsic challenges of developing whole-of-government approaches, highlighting considerable uncertainty and ambiguity among decision makers in Uganda about tobacco control governance. The analysis points to the potential for Uganda’s national coordinating mechanism to help reconcile competing expectations and demonstrate the importance of Article 5.3 beyond health actors. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06 2022-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9125367/ /pubmed/35078911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057049 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Male, Denis
Ralston, Rob
Nyamurungi, Kellen
Collin, Jeff
‘That is a Ministry of Health thing’: Article 5.3 implementation in Uganda and the challenge of whole-of-government accountability
title ‘That is a Ministry of Health thing’: Article 5.3 implementation in Uganda and the challenge of whole-of-government accountability
title_full ‘That is a Ministry of Health thing’: Article 5.3 implementation in Uganda and the challenge of whole-of-government accountability
title_fullStr ‘That is a Ministry of Health thing’: Article 5.3 implementation in Uganda and the challenge of whole-of-government accountability
title_full_unstemmed ‘That is a Ministry of Health thing’: Article 5.3 implementation in Uganda and the challenge of whole-of-government accountability
title_short ‘That is a Ministry of Health thing’: Article 5.3 implementation in Uganda and the challenge of whole-of-government accountability
title_sort ‘that is a ministry of health thing’: article 5.3 implementation in uganda and the challenge of whole-of-government accountability
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35078911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057049
work_keys_str_mv AT maledenis thatisaministryofhealththingarticle53implementationinugandaandthechallengeofwholeofgovernmentaccountability
AT ralstonrob thatisaministryofhealththingarticle53implementationinugandaandthechallengeofwholeofgovernmentaccountability
AT nyamurungikellen thatisaministryofhealththingarticle53implementationinugandaandthechallengeofwholeofgovernmentaccountability
AT collinjeff thatisaministryofhealththingarticle53implementationinugandaandthechallengeofwholeofgovernmentaccountability