Cargando…
’A contradiction between our state and the tobacco company’: conflicts of interest and institutional constraints as barriers to implementing Article 5.3 in Bangladesh
INTRODUCTION: Bangladesh has not yet adopted measures to implement Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. The National Tobacco Control Cell (NTCC) has drafted a guideline for implementation, but progress has stalled amid high levels of tobacco industry interference in public...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35078913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057142 |
_version_ | 1784711935197970432 |
---|---|
author | Abdullah, S M Wagner-Rizvi, Tracey Huque, Rumana Kanan, Sushama Huque, Samina Ralston, Rob Collin, Jeff |
author_facet | Abdullah, S M Wagner-Rizvi, Tracey Huque, Rumana Kanan, Sushama Huque, Samina Ralston, Rob Collin, Jeff |
author_sort | Abdullah, S M |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Bangladesh has not yet adopted measures to implement Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. The National Tobacco Control Cell (NTCC) has drafted a guideline for implementation, but progress has stalled amid high levels of tobacco industry interference in public policy. This paper examines the barriers to minimising industry interference in a context of close relationships between government officials and tobacco companies. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with government officials, representatives from civil society, think tank and media organisations, and academic researchers. The data were analysed using a ‘3 Is’ framework developed within the political sciences, emphasising the interactive role of ideas, interests and institutions in policy change. RESULTS: The findings indicate that policy ideas about protecting public health policy making from tobacco industry interests are largely restricted to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, and the NTCC specifically. Both individual and institutional conflicts of interest emerge as key barriers to progress to minimising industry interference and for tobacco control governance more broadly. The data also suggest that development of an Article 5.3 guideline has been shaped by the perceived interests of political actors and institutions, and the institutional position of the NTCC, constrained by limits on its resources, authority and isolation from other ministries. CONCLUSION: NTCC’s initiatives towards implementing Article 5.3 constitute an important opportunity to address conflicts of interest that restrict tobacco control in Bangladesh. Progress in minimising industry interference is essential to realising the commitment to being smoke free by 2040. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9125368 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91253682022-06-04 ’A contradiction between our state and the tobacco company’: conflicts of interest and institutional constraints as barriers to implementing Article 5.3 in Bangladesh Abdullah, S M Wagner-Rizvi, Tracey Huque, Rumana Kanan, Sushama Huque, Samina Ralston, Rob Collin, Jeff Tob Control Original Research INTRODUCTION: Bangladesh has not yet adopted measures to implement Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. The National Tobacco Control Cell (NTCC) has drafted a guideline for implementation, but progress has stalled amid high levels of tobacco industry interference in public policy. This paper examines the barriers to minimising industry interference in a context of close relationships between government officials and tobacco companies. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with government officials, representatives from civil society, think tank and media organisations, and academic researchers. The data were analysed using a ‘3 Is’ framework developed within the political sciences, emphasising the interactive role of ideas, interests and institutions in policy change. RESULTS: The findings indicate that policy ideas about protecting public health policy making from tobacco industry interests are largely restricted to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, and the NTCC specifically. Both individual and institutional conflicts of interest emerge as key barriers to progress to minimising industry interference and for tobacco control governance more broadly. The data also suggest that development of an Article 5.3 guideline has been shaped by the perceived interests of political actors and institutions, and the institutional position of the NTCC, constrained by limits on its resources, authority and isolation from other ministries. CONCLUSION: NTCC’s initiatives towards implementing Article 5.3 constitute an important opportunity to address conflicts of interest that restrict tobacco control in Bangladesh. Progress in minimising industry interference is essential to realising the commitment to being smoke free by 2040. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06 2022-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9125368/ /pubmed/35078913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057142 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Abdullah, S M Wagner-Rizvi, Tracey Huque, Rumana Kanan, Sushama Huque, Samina Ralston, Rob Collin, Jeff ’A contradiction between our state and the tobacco company’: conflicts of interest and institutional constraints as barriers to implementing Article 5.3 in Bangladesh |
title | ’A contradiction between our state and the tobacco company’: conflicts of interest and institutional constraints as barriers to implementing Article 5.3 in Bangladesh |
title_full | ’A contradiction between our state and the tobacco company’: conflicts of interest and institutional constraints as barriers to implementing Article 5.3 in Bangladesh |
title_fullStr | ’A contradiction between our state and the tobacco company’: conflicts of interest and institutional constraints as barriers to implementing Article 5.3 in Bangladesh |
title_full_unstemmed | ’A contradiction between our state and the tobacco company’: conflicts of interest and institutional constraints as barriers to implementing Article 5.3 in Bangladesh |
title_short | ’A contradiction between our state and the tobacco company’: conflicts of interest and institutional constraints as barriers to implementing Article 5.3 in Bangladesh |
title_sort | ’a contradiction between our state and the tobacco company’: conflicts of interest and institutional constraints as barriers to implementing article 5.3 in bangladesh |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35078913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057142 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdullahsm acontradictionbetweenourstateandthetobaccocompanyconflictsofinterestandinstitutionalconstraintsasbarrierstoimplementingarticle53inbangladesh AT wagnerrizvitracey acontradictionbetweenourstateandthetobaccocompanyconflictsofinterestandinstitutionalconstraintsasbarrierstoimplementingarticle53inbangladesh AT huquerumana acontradictionbetweenourstateandthetobaccocompanyconflictsofinterestandinstitutionalconstraintsasbarrierstoimplementingarticle53inbangladesh AT kanansushama acontradictionbetweenourstateandthetobaccocompanyconflictsofinterestandinstitutionalconstraintsasbarrierstoimplementingarticle53inbangladesh AT huquesamina acontradictionbetweenourstateandthetobaccocompanyconflictsofinterestandinstitutionalconstraintsasbarrierstoimplementingarticle53inbangladesh AT ralstonrob acontradictionbetweenourstateandthetobaccocompanyconflictsofinterestandinstitutionalconstraintsasbarrierstoimplementingarticle53inbangladesh AT collinjeff acontradictionbetweenourstateandthetobaccocompanyconflictsofinterestandinstitutionalconstraintsasbarrierstoimplementingarticle53inbangladesh |