Cargando…

Oral pharmacological treatments for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Pharmacological treatments for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) are empirically used. However, the quantitative comparative effectiveness and safety of multiple pharmacological treatments is lacking. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controll...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Zongshi, Zhang, Chao, Guo, Jianbo, Kwong, Joey S.W., Li, Xiao, Pang, Ran, Doiron, R.Christopher, Nickel, J.Curtis, Wu, Jiani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35706494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101457
_version_ 1784711984434905088
author Qin, Zongshi
Zhang, Chao
Guo, Jianbo
Kwong, Joey S.W.
Li, Xiao
Pang, Ran
Doiron, R.Christopher
Nickel, J.Curtis
Wu, Jiani
author_facet Qin, Zongshi
Zhang, Chao
Guo, Jianbo
Kwong, Joey S.W.
Li, Xiao
Pang, Ran
Doiron, R.Christopher
Nickel, J.Curtis
Wu, Jiani
author_sort Qin, Zongshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pharmacological treatments for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) are empirically used. However, the quantitative comparative effectiveness and safety of multiple pharmacological treatments is lacking. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 22, 2022. Randomised controlled trials comparing two or more oral pharmacological treatments for patients with CP/CPPS were included. Title, abstract, and full-text screening were independently screened by four reviewers. Primary outcomes were efficacy (the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index [NIH—CPSI] total score, pain score, urinary score, and quality of life score [QoL]) and safety (adverse events). This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020184106. FINDINGS: 25 studies (3514 patients) assessed 26 treatments. Low to very low quality evidence indicated that doxazosin (Mean difference [MD], –11.4, 95% Credible interval [CrI], –17.5 to –5.1) and the doxazosin, ibuprofen, and thiocolchicoside combination (MD, –11.6, CrI, –18.1 to –5.3) were significantly more effective than placebo in the NIH—CPSI total score. Other NIH—CPSI relative outcomes (pain, urinary, and QoL scores) showed a similar pattern. Low and very low quality evidence suggested that combination treatment including doxazosin, ibuprofen, and thiocolchicoside (odds ratios [OR], 3.2, CrI, 0.5 to 19.3) and the tamsulosin and dapoxetine combination (OR, 6.0, CrI, 0.7 to 67.3) caused more adverse events. In half of all comparisons regarding NIH—CPSI pain scores and quality of life scores, heterogeneity was minimal or low. Heterogeneity was high in both NIH—CPSI total symptom scores (I(2) = 78.0%) and pain scores (I(2) = 87. 0%) for tamsulosin versus placebo. There was also high heterogeneity in NIH—CPSI urine scores for the combination of tamsulosin and ciprofloxacin versus tamsulosin (I(2) = 66.8%), tamsulosin and levofloxacin versus tamsulosin (I(2) = 93.3%), and tamsulosin versus placebo (I(2) = 83%). INTERPRETATION: Pharmacological treatments have little evidence supporting efficacy in CP/CPPS. Future studies could personalise therapy for individuals according to specific symptoms and identify non-pharmacological targets for CP/CPPS. FUNDING: Dr Jiani Wu received funding for this project from the China Association for Science and Technology (2017QNRC001), the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (ZZ13-YQ-027), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82105037).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9125656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91256562022-06-14 Oral pharmacological treatments for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Qin, Zongshi Zhang, Chao Guo, Jianbo Kwong, Joey S.W. Li, Xiao Pang, Ran Doiron, R.Christopher Nickel, J.Curtis Wu, Jiani eClinicalMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: Pharmacological treatments for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) are empirically used. However, the quantitative comparative effectiveness and safety of multiple pharmacological treatments is lacking. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 22, 2022. Randomised controlled trials comparing two or more oral pharmacological treatments for patients with CP/CPPS were included. Title, abstract, and full-text screening were independently screened by four reviewers. Primary outcomes were efficacy (the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index [NIH—CPSI] total score, pain score, urinary score, and quality of life score [QoL]) and safety (adverse events). This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020184106. FINDINGS: 25 studies (3514 patients) assessed 26 treatments. Low to very low quality evidence indicated that doxazosin (Mean difference [MD], –11.4, 95% Credible interval [CrI], –17.5 to –5.1) and the doxazosin, ibuprofen, and thiocolchicoside combination (MD, –11.6, CrI, –18.1 to –5.3) were significantly more effective than placebo in the NIH—CPSI total score. Other NIH—CPSI relative outcomes (pain, urinary, and QoL scores) showed a similar pattern. Low and very low quality evidence suggested that combination treatment including doxazosin, ibuprofen, and thiocolchicoside (odds ratios [OR], 3.2, CrI, 0.5 to 19.3) and the tamsulosin and dapoxetine combination (OR, 6.0, CrI, 0.7 to 67.3) caused more adverse events. In half of all comparisons regarding NIH—CPSI pain scores and quality of life scores, heterogeneity was minimal or low. Heterogeneity was high in both NIH—CPSI total symptom scores (I(2) = 78.0%) and pain scores (I(2) = 87. 0%) for tamsulosin versus placebo. There was also high heterogeneity in NIH—CPSI urine scores for the combination of tamsulosin and ciprofloxacin versus tamsulosin (I(2) = 66.8%), tamsulosin and levofloxacin versus tamsulosin (I(2) = 93.3%), and tamsulosin versus placebo (I(2) = 83%). INTERPRETATION: Pharmacological treatments have little evidence supporting efficacy in CP/CPPS. Future studies could personalise therapy for individuals according to specific symptoms and identify non-pharmacological targets for CP/CPPS. FUNDING: Dr Jiani Wu received funding for this project from the China Association for Science and Technology (2017QNRC001), the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (ZZ13-YQ-027), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82105037). Elsevier 2022-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9125656/ /pubmed/35706494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101457 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Qin, Zongshi
Zhang, Chao
Guo, Jianbo
Kwong, Joey S.W.
Li, Xiao
Pang, Ran
Doiron, R.Christopher
Nickel, J.Curtis
Wu, Jiani
Oral pharmacological treatments for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title Oral pharmacological treatments for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full Oral pharmacological treatments for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Oral pharmacological treatments for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Oral pharmacological treatments for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_short Oral pharmacological treatments for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_sort oral pharmacological treatments for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35706494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101457
work_keys_str_mv AT qinzongshi oralpharmacologicaltreatmentsforchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangchao oralpharmacologicaltreatmentsforchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT guojianbo oralpharmacologicaltreatmentsforchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT kwongjoeysw oralpharmacologicaltreatmentsforchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT lixiao oralpharmacologicaltreatmentsforchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT pangran oralpharmacologicaltreatmentsforchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT doironrchristopher oralpharmacologicaltreatmentsforchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT nickeljcurtis oralpharmacologicaltreatmentsforchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT wujiani oralpharmacologicaltreatmentsforchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials