Cargando…

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing versus standard care alone in patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: protocol for a multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up

INTRODUCTION: Patients with osteoporosis may suffer from a fracture after minimal trauma. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are among the most common fractures, often leading to substantial pain. There is a need for evidence-based conservative treatment to aid in the management of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Annemarijn, Huysmans, Stephanie M D, van Kuijk, Sander M J, Evers, Silvia M A A, Jutten, Elisabeth M C, Senden, Rachel, Paulus, Aggie T G, van den Bergh, Joop P W, de Bie, Rob A, Merk, Johannes M R, Bours, Sandrine P G, Hulsbosch, Mark, Janssen, Esther R C, Curfs, Inez, van Hemert, Wouter L W, Schotanus, Martijn G M, de Baat, Paul, Schepel, Niek C, den Boer, Willem A, Hendriks, Johannes G E, Liu, Wai-Yan, de Kleuver, Marinus, Pouw, Martin H, van Hooff, Miranda L, Jacobs, Eva, Willems, Paul C P H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35613823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054315
_version_ 1784711992443928576
author Weber, Annemarijn
Huysmans, Stephanie M D
van Kuijk, Sander M J
Evers, Silvia M A A
Jutten, Elisabeth M C
Senden, Rachel
Paulus, Aggie T G
van den Bergh, Joop P W
de Bie, Rob A
Merk, Johannes M R
Bours, Sandrine P G
Hulsbosch, Mark
Janssen, Esther R C
Curfs, Inez
van Hemert, Wouter L W
Schotanus, Martijn G M
de Baat, Paul
Schepel, Niek C
den Boer, Willem A
Hendriks, Johannes G E
Liu, Wai-Yan
de Kleuver, Marinus
Pouw, Martin H
van Hooff, Miranda L
Jacobs, Eva
Willems, Paul C P H
author_facet Weber, Annemarijn
Huysmans, Stephanie M D
van Kuijk, Sander M J
Evers, Silvia M A A
Jutten, Elisabeth M C
Senden, Rachel
Paulus, Aggie T G
van den Bergh, Joop P W
de Bie, Rob A
Merk, Johannes M R
Bours, Sandrine P G
Hulsbosch, Mark
Janssen, Esther R C
Curfs, Inez
van Hemert, Wouter L W
Schotanus, Martijn G M
de Baat, Paul
Schepel, Niek C
den Boer, Willem A
Hendriks, Johannes G E
Liu, Wai-Yan
de Kleuver, Marinus
Pouw, Martin H
van Hooff, Miranda L
Jacobs, Eva
Willems, Paul C P H
author_sort Weber, Annemarijn
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patients with osteoporosis may suffer from a fracture after minimal trauma. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are among the most common fractures, often leading to substantial pain. There is a need for evidence-based conservative treatment to aid in the management of OVCFs. The objective of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing in addition to standard care for improving quality of life (QoL) in patients suffering from an OVCF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Ninety-eight postmenopausal women from two academic and four community hospitals with a recent symptomatic thoracolumbar OVCF will be randomised into either the standard care or dynamic bracing group. In the dynamic bracing group, the Spinova Osteo orthosis will be used in addition to standard care. Standard care comprises pain control with analgesics, physical therapy and osteoporosis medication. The primary outcome parameter is QoL 1 year after inclusion, as measured by the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41). Secondary outcome parameters are pain, pain medication used, functional disability, sagittal spinal alignment, recurrence rate of OVCFs and physical activity in daily life. A trial-based economic evaluation consisting of both cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis will be performed based on empirical data obtained in the RCT. A process evaluation will assess the feasibility of dynamic bracing. All outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the Medical Ethics Committee, University Hospital Maastricht and Maastricht University (METC azM/UM) (NL74552.068.20/METC 20-055). Patients will be included only after verification of eligibility and obtaining written informed consent. Results will be disseminated via the Dutch National Osteoporosis Patient Society and via publications and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL8746.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9125700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91257002022-06-04 Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing versus standard care alone in patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: protocol for a multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up Weber, Annemarijn Huysmans, Stephanie M D van Kuijk, Sander M J Evers, Silvia M A A Jutten, Elisabeth M C Senden, Rachel Paulus, Aggie T G van den Bergh, Joop P W de Bie, Rob A Merk, Johannes M R Bours, Sandrine P G Hulsbosch, Mark Janssen, Esther R C Curfs, Inez van Hemert, Wouter L W Schotanus, Martijn G M de Baat, Paul Schepel, Niek C den Boer, Willem A Hendriks, Johannes G E Liu, Wai-Yan de Kleuver, Marinus Pouw, Martin H van Hooff, Miranda L Jacobs, Eva Willems, Paul C P H BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: Patients with osteoporosis may suffer from a fracture after minimal trauma. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are among the most common fractures, often leading to substantial pain. There is a need for evidence-based conservative treatment to aid in the management of OVCFs. The objective of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing in addition to standard care for improving quality of life (QoL) in patients suffering from an OVCF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Ninety-eight postmenopausal women from two academic and four community hospitals with a recent symptomatic thoracolumbar OVCF will be randomised into either the standard care or dynamic bracing group. In the dynamic bracing group, the Spinova Osteo orthosis will be used in addition to standard care. Standard care comprises pain control with analgesics, physical therapy and osteoporosis medication. The primary outcome parameter is QoL 1 year after inclusion, as measured by the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41). Secondary outcome parameters are pain, pain medication used, functional disability, sagittal spinal alignment, recurrence rate of OVCFs and physical activity in daily life. A trial-based economic evaluation consisting of both cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis will be performed based on empirical data obtained in the RCT. A process evaluation will assess the feasibility of dynamic bracing. All outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the Medical Ethics Committee, University Hospital Maastricht and Maastricht University (METC azM/UM) (NL74552.068.20/METC 20-055). Patients will be included only after verification of eligibility and obtaining written informed consent. Results will be disseminated via the Dutch National Osteoporosis Patient Society and via publications and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL8746. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9125700/ /pubmed/35613823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054315 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Methods
Weber, Annemarijn
Huysmans, Stephanie M D
van Kuijk, Sander M J
Evers, Silvia M A A
Jutten, Elisabeth M C
Senden, Rachel
Paulus, Aggie T G
van den Bergh, Joop P W
de Bie, Rob A
Merk, Johannes M R
Bours, Sandrine P G
Hulsbosch, Mark
Janssen, Esther R C
Curfs, Inez
van Hemert, Wouter L W
Schotanus, Martijn G M
de Baat, Paul
Schepel, Niek C
den Boer, Willem A
Hendriks, Johannes G E
Liu, Wai-Yan
de Kleuver, Marinus
Pouw, Martin H
van Hooff, Miranda L
Jacobs, Eva
Willems, Paul C P H
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing versus standard care alone in patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: protocol for a multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up
title Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing versus standard care alone in patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: protocol for a multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up
title_full Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing versus standard care alone in patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: protocol for a multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up
title_fullStr Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing versus standard care alone in patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: protocol for a multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing versus standard care alone in patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: protocol for a multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up
title_short Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing versus standard care alone in patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: protocol for a multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up
title_sort effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing versus standard care alone in patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: protocol for a multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35613823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054315
work_keys_str_mv AT weberannemarijn effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT huysmansstephaniemd effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT vankuijksandermj effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT everssilviamaa effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT juttenelisabethmc effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT sendenrachel effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT paulusaggietg effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT vandenberghjooppw effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT debieroba effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT merkjohannesmr effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT bourssandrinepg effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT hulsboschmark effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT janssenestherrc effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT curfsinez effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT vanhemertwouterlw effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT schotanusmartijngm effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT debaatpaul effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT schepelniekc effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT denboerwillema effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT hendriksjohannesge effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT liuwaiyan effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT dekleuvermarinus effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT pouwmartinh effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT vanhooffmirandal effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT jacobseva effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup
AT willemspaulcph effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdynamicbracingversusstandardcarealoneinpatientssufferingfromosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesprotocolforamulticentretwoarmedparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialwith12monthsoffollowup