Cargando…
The effectiveness of weight loss programs for low back pain: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Low back pain has been associated with obesity or with being overweight. However, there are no high-quality systematic reviews that have been conducted on the effect of all types of weight loss programs focused on individuals with low back pain. Therefore, the present systematic review a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05391-w |
_version_ | 1784712033662402560 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Lu Hsi Weber, Kirsten Mehrabkhani, Saba Baskaran, Sarmina Abbass, Thomas Macedo, Luciana Gazzi |
author_facet | Chen, Lu Hsi Weber, Kirsten Mehrabkhani, Saba Baskaran, Sarmina Abbass, Thomas Macedo, Luciana Gazzi |
author_sort | Chen, Lu Hsi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Low back pain has been associated with obesity or with being overweight. However, there are no high-quality systematic reviews that have been conducted on the effect of all types of weight loss programs focused on individuals with low back pain. Therefore, the present systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of weight loss programs in reducing back pain and disability or increasing quality of life for individuals experiencing low back pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Searches for relevant studies were conducted on CINAHL, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and AMED. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials, non-randomized studies of intervention or quasi-experimental designs evaluating a weight loss program for persons with low back pain aimed at decreasing back pain and disability. The Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool was used to evaluate individual studies and GRADE was used to summarize the quality of the evidence. The review was prospectively registered; PROSPERO#: CRD42020196099. RESULTS: Eleven studies (n = 689 participants) including one randomized controlled trial, two non-randomized studies of intervention and eight single-arm studies were included (seven of which evaluated bariatric surgery). There was low-quality evidence that a lifestyle intervention was no better than waitlist for improving back pain and very low-quality evidence from single-arm studies that back pain improved from baseline after bariatric surgery. Most studies included were of poor quality, primarily due to selection bias, uncontrolled confounders, and lack of blinding, limiting the quality of evidence. CONCLUSION: There is very low-quality evidence that weight loss programs may improve back pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with LBP, although adherence and maintenance are potential barriers to implementation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05391-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9125929 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91259292022-05-24 The effectiveness of weight loss programs for low back pain: a systematic review Chen, Lu Hsi Weber, Kirsten Mehrabkhani, Saba Baskaran, Sarmina Abbass, Thomas Macedo, Luciana Gazzi BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Low back pain has been associated with obesity or with being overweight. However, there are no high-quality systematic reviews that have been conducted on the effect of all types of weight loss programs focused on individuals with low back pain. Therefore, the present systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of weight loss programs in reducing back pain and disability or increasing quality of life for individuals experiencing low back pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Searches for relevant studies were conducted on CINAHL, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and AMED. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials, non-randomized studies of intervention or quasi-experimental designs evaluating a weight loss program for persons with low back pain aimed at decreasing back pain and disability. The Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool was used to evaluate individual studies and GRADE was used to summarize the quality of the evidence. The review was prospectively registered; PROSPERO#: CRD42020196099. RESULTS: Eleven studies (n = 689 participants) including one randomized controlled trial, two non-randomized studies of intervention and eight single-arm studies were included (seven of which evaluated bariatric surgery). There was low-quality evidence that a lifestyle intervention was no better than waitlist for improving back pain and very low-quality evidence from single-arm studies that back pain improved from baseline after bariatric surgery. Most studies included were of poor quality, primarily due to selection bias, uncontrolled confounders, and lack of blinding, limiting the quality of evidence. CONCLUSION: There is very low-quality evidence that weight loss programs may improve back pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with LBP, although adherence and maintenance are potential barriers to implementation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05391-w. BioMed Central 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9125929/ /pubmed/35606809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05391-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Chen, Lu Hsi Weber, Kirsten Mehrabkhani, Saba Baskaran, Sarmina Abbass, Thomas Macedo, Luciana Gazzi The effectiveness of weight loss programs for low back pain: a systematic review |
title | The effectiveness of weight loss programs for low back pain: a systematic review |
title_full | The effectiveness of weight loss programs for low back pain: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of weight loss programs for low back pain: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of weight loss programs for low back pain: a systematic review |
title_short | The effectiveness of weight loss programs for low back pain: a systematic review |
title_sort | effectiveness of weight loss programs for low back pain: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05391-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenluhsi theeffectivenessofweightlossprogramsforlowbackpainasystematicreview AT weberkirsten theeffectivenessofweightlossprogramsforlowbackpainasystematicreview AT mehrabkhanisaba theeffectivenessofweightlossprogramsforlowbackpainasystematicreview AT baskaransarmina theeffectivenessofweightlossprogramsforlowbackpainasystematicreview AT abbassthomas theeffectivenessofweightlossprogramsforlowbackpainasystematicreview AT macedolucianagazzi theeffectivenessofweightlossprogramsforlowbackpainasystematicreview AT chenluhsi effectivenessofweightlossprogramsforlowbackpainasystematicreview AT weberkirsten effectivenessofweightlossprogramsforlowbackpainasystematicreview AT mehrabkhanisaba effectivenessofweightlossprogramsforlowbackpainasystematicreview AT baskaransarmina effectivenessofweightlossprogramsforlowbackpainasystematicreview AT abbassthomas effectivenessofweightlossprogramsforlowbackpainasystematicreview AT macedolucianagazzi effectivenessofweightlossprogramsforlowbackpainasystematicreview |