Cargando…

Safety and effectiveness of live broadcast of surgical procedures: systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Live Broadcast of Surgical Procedures (LBSP) has gained popularity in conferences and educational meetings in the past few decades. This is due to rapid advancement in both Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) that enable transmission of the entire operative field and transmission ease and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Awad, Mina, Chowdhary, Manish, Hermena, Shady, Falaha, Sara El, Slim, Naim, Francis, Nader K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35604484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09072-6
_version_ 1784712042946494464
author Awad, Mina
Chowdhary, Manish
Hermena, Shady
Falaha, Sara El
Slim, Naim
Francis, Nader K.
author_facet Awad, Mina
Chowdhary, Manish
Hermena, Shady
Falaha, Sara El
Slim, Naim
Francis, Nader K.
author_sort Awad, Mina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Live Broadcast of Surgical Procedures (LBSP) has gained popularity in conferences and educational meetings in the past few decades. This is due to rapid advancement in both Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) that enable transmission of the entire operative field and transmission ease and technology to help broadcast the operation to a live audience. The aim of this study was to update the evidence with specific emphasis on the patient safety issues related to LBSP in MIS. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using Medline, Embase and Pubmed using defined search terms related to LBSP in educational events across all surgical specialities, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. We also consolidated the prior guidelines and position statements on this topic. Outcomes included reports on the educational value of LBSP as well as patient safety outcomes and ethical issues that were captured by clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total 1230 abstracts were identified with 27 papers meeting the inclusion criteria (13 original articles and 14 position statements/guidelines). All studies highlighted the educational benefits of LBSP but without clear measure of these benefits. Clinical outcomes were not compromised in 9 studies but were inferior in the remaining 4, including lower completion rate of endoscopic surgery and higher rate of re-operation. Only nine studies complied with dedicated consent forms for LBSP with no consistent approach of reporting on maintaining patient confidentiality during LBSP. There was a lack of recommendation on standardised approach of reporting on LBSP including the outcomes across the 14 published guidelines and positions statements. CONCLUSIONS: Live Broadcast of Surgical Procedures can be of educational value but patient safety may be compromised. A standardised framework of reporting on LBSP and its outcomes is required from an ethical and patient safety perspective. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42021256901. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09072-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9125972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91259722022-05-23 Safety and effectiveness of live broadcast of surgical procedures: systematic review Awad, Mina Chowdhary, Manish Hermena, Shady Falaha, Sara El Slim, Naim Francis, Nader K. Surg Endosc Review Article INTRODUCTION: Live Broadcast of Surgical Procedures (LBSP) has gained popularity in conferences and educational meetings in the past few decades. This is due to rapid advancement in both Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) that enable transmission of the entire operative field and transmission ease and technology to help broadcast the operation to a live audience. The aim of this study was to update the evidence with specific emphasis on the patient safety issues related to LBSP in MIS. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using Medline, Embase and Pubmed using defined search terms related to LBSP in educational events across all surgical specialities, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. We also consolidated the prior guidelines and position statements on this topic. Outcomes included reports on the educational value of LBSP as well as patient safety outcomes and ethical issues that were captured by clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total 1230 abstracts were identified with 27 papers meeting the inclusion criteria (13 original articles and 14 position statements/guidelines). All studies highlighted the educational benefits of LBSP but without clear measure of these benefits. Clinical outcomes were not compromised in 9 studies but were inferior in the remaining 4, including lower completion rate of endoscopic surgery and higher rate of re-operation. Only nine studies complied with dedicated consent forms for LBSP with no consistent approach of reporting on maintaining patient confidentiality during LBSP. There was a lack of recommendation on standardised approach of reporting on LBSP including the outcomes across the 14 published guidelines and positions statements. CONCLUSIONS: Live Broadcast of Surgical Procedures can be of educational value but patient safety may be compromised. A standardised framework of reporting on LBSP and its outcomes is required from an ethical and patient safety perspective. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42021256901. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09072-6. Springer US 2022-05-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9125972/ /pubmed/35604484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09072-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Review Article
Awad, Mina
Chowdhary, Manish
Hermena, Shady
Falaha, Sara El
Slim, Naim
Francis, Nader K.
Safety and effectiveness of live broadcast of surgical procedures: systematic review
title Safety and effectiveness of live broadcast of surgical procedures: systematic review
title_full Safety and effectiveness of live broadcast of surgical procedures: systematic review
title_fullStr Safety and effectiveness of live broadcast of surgical procedures: systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Safety and effectiveness of live broadcast of surgical procedures: systematic review
title_short Safety and effectiveness of live broadcast of surgical procedures: systematic review
title_sort safety and effectiveness of live broadcast of surgical procedures: systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35604484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09072-6
work_keys_str_mv AT awadmina safetyandeffectivenessoflivebroadcastofsurgicalproceduressystematicreview
AT chowdharymanish safetyandeffectivenessoflivebroadcastofsurgicalproceduressystematicreview
AT hermenashady safetyandeffectivenessoflivebroadcastofsurgicalproceduressystematicreview
AT falahasarael safetyandeffectivenessoflivebroadcastofsurgicalproceduressystematicreview
AT slimnaim safetyandeffectivenessoflivebroadcastofsurgicalproceduressystematicreview
AT francisnaderk safetyandeffectivenessoflivebroadcastofsurgicalproceduressystematicreview