Cargando…

Has the pandemic changed treatment strategy in multiple sclerosis?

BACKGROUND: Social distancing measures during the Covid-19 pandemic reduced access to health care and concerns were raised over the safety of immunosuppressive disease modifying treatments (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in DMT prescription before and during the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bsteh, Gabriel, Riedl, Katharina, Krajnc, Nik, Kornek, Barbara, Leutmezer, Fritz, Macher, Stefan, Rommer, Paulus, Zulehner, Gudrun, Berger, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35636274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.103912
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Social distancing measures during the Covid-19 pandemic reduced access to health care and concerns were raised over the safety of immunosuppressive disease modifying treatments (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in DMT prescription before and during the pandemic in a large and well-characterized real-world cohort of MS patients. METHODS: From the Vienna MS database (VMSD) we extracted MS patients who were initiated on a new DMT (both treatment-naïve and switching) between January 1st 2017 and December 31st 2021. Two time periods were defined: 1) the preCovid-19 era (January 1st 2017 to March 15th 2020, i.e. the day of the first lockdown in Austria) and the Covid-19 era (March 16th 2020 to December 31st 2021). Average annualized DMT prescription rates were descriptively compared between the two periods. RESULTS: The average annualized number of prescriptions in the preCovid-19 era was 90.3/year and dropped to 74.8/year (-17.2%) in the Covid-19 era, driven by a marked reduction to 41.7/year (-54%) in the first nine months of the Covid-19 era, partly offset by a rise to 101 in 2021. Use of alemtuzumab (-64%), antiCD20 (-49%), cladribine (-46%), and S1PM (-38%) was reduced, while natalizumab increased by 24%. Lower efficacy treatments remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic coincides with a drop in DMT prescription, most markedly for immunosuppressive high-efficacy treatments, strongly suggesting the pandemic as the causal factor. If and how much this affects long-term outcome is yet to be determined.