Cargando…
Has the pandemic changed treatment strategy in multiple sclerosis?
BACKGROUND: Social distancing measures during the Covid-19 pandemic reduced access to health care and concerns were raised over the safety of immunosuppressive disease modifying treatments (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in DMT prescription before and during the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35636274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.103912 |
_version_ | 1784712045290061824 |
---|---|
author | Bsteh, Gabriel Riedl, Katharina Krajnc, Nik Kornek, Barbara Leutmezer, Fritz Macher, Stefan Rommer, Paulus Zulehner, Gudrun Berger, Thomas |
author_facet | Bsteh, Gabriel Riedl, Katharina Krajnc, Nik Kornek, Barbara Leutmezer, Fritz Macher, Stefan Rommer, Paulus Zulehner, Gudrun Berger, Thomas |
author_sort | Bsteh, Gabriel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Social distancing measures during the Covid-19 pandemic reduced access to health care and concerns were raised over the safety of immunosuppressive disease modifying treatments (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in DMT prescription before and during the pandemic in a large and well-characterized real-world cohort of MS patients. METHODS: From the Vienna MS database (VMSD) we extracted MS patients who were initiated on a new DMT (both treatment-naïve and switching) between January 1st 2017 and December 31st 2021. Two time periods were defined: 1) the preCovid-19 era (January 1st 2017 to March 15th 2020, i.e. the day of the first lockdown in Austria) and the Covid-19 era (March 16th 2020 to December 31st 2021). Average annualized DMT prescription rates were descriptively compared between the two periods. RESULTS: The average annualized number of prescriptions in the preCovid-19 era was 90.3/year and dropped to 74.8/year (-17.2%) in the Covid-19 era, driven by a marked reduction to 41.7/year (-54%) in the first nine months of the Covid-19 era, partly offset by a rise to 101 in 2021. Use of alemtuzumab (-64%), antiCD20 (-49%), cladribine (-46%), and S1PM (-38%) was reduced, while natalizumab increased by 24%. Lower efficacy treatments remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic coincides with a drop in DMT prescription, most markedly for immunosuppressive high-efficacy treatments, strongly suggesting the pandemic as the causal factor. If and how much this affects long-term outcome is yet to be determined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9125982 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91259822022-05-23 Has the pandemic changed treatment strategy in multiple sclerosis? Bsteh, Gabriel Riedl, Katharina Krajnc, Nik Kornek, Barbara Leutmezer, Fritz Macher, Stefan Rommer, Paulus Zulehner, Gudrun Berger, Thomas Mult Scler Relat Disord Article BACKGROUND: Social distancing measures during the Covid-19 pandemic reduced access to health care and concerns were raised over the safety of immunosuppressive disease modifying treatments (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in DMT prescription before and during the pandemic in a large and well-characterized real-world cohort of MS patients. METHODS: From the Vienna MS database (VMSD) we extracted MS patients who were initiated on a new DMT (both treatment-naïve and switching) between January 1st 2017 and December 31st 2021. Two time periods were defined: 1) the preCovid-19 era (January 1st 2017 to March 15th 2020, i.e. the day of the first lockdown in Austria) and the Covid-19 era (March 16th 2020 to December 31st 2021). Average annualized DMT prescription rates were descriptively compared between the two periods. RESULTS: The average annualized number of prescriptions in the preCovid-19 era was 90.3/year and dropped to 74.8/year (-17.2%) in the Covid-19 era, driven by a marked reduction to 41.7/year (-54%) in the first nine months of the Covid-19 era, partly offset by a rise to 101 in 2021. Use of alemtuzumab (-64%), antiCD20 (-49%), cladribine (-46%), and S1PM (-38%) was reduced, while natalizumab increased by 24%. Lower efficacy treatments remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic coincides with a drop in DMT prescription, most markedly for immunosuppressive high-efficacy treatments, strongly suggesting the pandemic as the causal factor. If and how much this affects long-term outcome is yet to be determined. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022-07 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9125982/ /pubmed/35636274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.103912 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Bsteh, Gabriel Riedl, Katharina Krajnc, Nik Kornek, Barbara Leutmezer, Fritz Macher, Stefan Rommer, Paulus Zulehner, Gudrun Berger, Thomas Has the pandemic changed treatment strategy in multiple sclerosis? |
title | Has the pandemic changed treatment strategy in multiple sclerosis? |
title_full | Has the pandemic changed treatment strategy in multiple sclerosis? |
title_fullStr | Has the pandemic changed treatment strategy in multiple sclerosis? |
title_full_unstemmed | Has the pandemic changed treatment strategy in multiple sclerosis? |
title_short | Has the pandemic changed treatment strategy in multiple sclerosis? |
title_sort | has the pandemic changed treatment strategy in multiple sclerosis? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9125982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35636274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.103912 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bstehgabriel hasthepandemicchangedtreatmentstrategyinmultiplesclerosis AT riedlkatharina hasthepandemicchangedtreatmentstrategyinmultiplesclerosis AT krajncnik hasthepandemicchangedtreatmentstrategyinmultiplesclerosis AT kornekbarbara hasthepandemicchangedtreatmentstrategyinmultiplesclerosis AT leutmezerfritz hasthepandemicchangedtreatmentstrategyinmultiplesclerosis AT macherstefan hasthepandemicchangedtreatmentstrategyinmultiplesclerosis AT rommerpaulus hasthepandemicchangedtreatmentstrategyinmultiplesclerosis AT zulehnergudrun hasthepandemicchangedtreatmentstrategyinmultiplesclerosis AT bergerthomas hasthepandemicchangedtreatmentstrategyinmultiplesclerosis AT hasthepandemicchangedtreatmentstrategyinmultiplesclerosis |