Cargando…
Summaries of harms in systematic reviews are unreliable Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms
OBJECTIVE: Most systematic reviews of interventions focus on potential benefits. Common methods and assumptions that are appropriate for assessing benefits can be inappropriate for harms. This paper provides a primer on researching harms, particularly in systematic reviews. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING:...
Autores principales: | Qureshi, Riaz, Mayo-Wilson, Evan, Li, Tianjing |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9126149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34742788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.023 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 2: Methods used to assess harms are neglected in systematic reviews of gabapentin
por: Qureshi, Riaz, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 3: Given the same data sources, systematic reviews of gabapentin have different results for harms
por: Qureshi, Riaz, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Conducting separate reviews of benefits and harms could improve systematic reviews and meta-analyses
por: Mayo-Wilson, Evan, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Comparing the Value of Data Visualization Methods for Communicating Harms in Clinical Trials
por: Qureshi, Riaz, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Opportunities for selective reporting of harms in randomized clinical trials: Selection criteria for non-systematic adverse events
por: Mayo-Wilson, Evan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)