Cargando…

Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?

BACKGROUND: Adequate replacement for patients with hemophilia is costly, especially in countries with limited resources. OBJECTIVE: Factor VIII gene mutations among Thai patients with hemophilia A were analyzed for the most common mutation. The cost-effectiveness of finding one female without family...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sasanakul, Werasak, Chuansumrit, Ampaiwan, Sirachainan, Nongnuch, Kadegasem, Praguywan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9126152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35615343
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S363132
_version_ 1784712073008119808
author Sasanakul, Werasak
Chuansumrit, Ampaiwan
Sirachainan, Nongnuch
Kadegasem, Praguywan
author_facet Sasanakul, Werasak
Chuansumrit, Ampaiwan
Sirachainan, Nongnuch
Kadegasem, Praguywan
author_sort Sasanakul, Werasak
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adequate replacement for patients with hemophilia is costly, especially in countries with limited resources. OBJECTIVE: Factor VIII gene mutations among Thai patients with hemophilia A were analyzed for the most common mutation. The cost-effectiveness of finding one female without family history of hemophilia possessing the most common factor VIII mutation was compared with the cost of treating one patient with hemophilia. METHODS: In all, 109 unrelated patients with hemophilia A, defined as sporadic cases (n=58) and hereditary cases (n=51), were enrolled for genotypic analysis. RESULTS: Intron 22 inversion was prominently found in 34 sporadic (58.6%) and 27 hereditary (51.9%) cases. The screening for intron 22 inversion among females without family history of hemophilia at antenatal care has been optionally suggested. A female with a positive result will undergo further prenatal diagnosis of hemophilia in her male offspring. On the contrary, a female with a negative test result remains at risk to have a hemophiliac son caused by other factor VIII gene mutations not included in the screening but the risk is not as high as intron 22 inversion. Although the screening of factor VIII mutation among females without family history of hemophilia is against the current practice, it has been initiated due to the inadequate treatment provided to patients with hemophilia in countries with limited resources. The study calculated approximately one female with intron 22 inversion would exist among 17,064 females without family history of hemophilia. The cost of screening (194,870 USD) was much less than that of treating one patient with hemophilia from birth to 40 years of age by the current regimen (378,000 USD). CONCLUSION: Implementing antenatal screening of intron 22 inversion among females without family history of hemophilia is optionally suggested, especially in economically less-developed countries with inadequate treatment service for patients with hemophilia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9126152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91261522022-05-24 Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening? Sasanakul, Werasak Chuansumrit, Ampaiwan Sirachainan, Nongnuch Kadegasem, Praguywan Appl Clin Genet Original Research BACKGROUND: Adequate replacement for patients with hemophilia is costly, especially in countries with limited resources. OBJECTIVE: Factor VIII gene mutations among Thai patients with hemophilia A were analyzed for the most common mutation. The cost-effectiveness of finding one female without family history of hemophilia possessing the most common factor VIII mutation was compared with the cost of treating one patient with hemophilia. METHODS: In all, 109 unrelated patients with hemophilia A, defined as sporadic cases (n=58) and hereditary cases (n=51), were enrolled for genotypic analysis. RESULTS: Intron 22 inversion was prominently found in 34 sporadic (58.6%) and 27 hereditary (51.9%) cases. The screening for intron 22 inversion among females without family history of hemophilia at antenatal care has been optionally suggested. A female with a positive result will undergo further prenatal diagnosis of hemophilia in her male offspring. On the contrary, a female with a negative test result remains at risk to have a hemophiliac son caused by other factor VIII gene mutations not included in the screening but the risk is not as high as intron 22 inversion. Although the screening of factor VIII mutation among females without family history of hemophilia is against the current practice, it has been initiated due to the inadequate treatment provided to patients with hemophilia in countries with limited resources. The study calculated approximately one female with intron 22 inversion would exist among 17,064 females without family history of hemophilia. The cost of screening (194,870 USD) was much less than that of treating one patient with hemophilia from birth to 40 years of age by the current regimen (378,000 USD). CONCLUSION: Implementing antenatal screening of intron 22 inversion among females without family history of hemophilia is optionally suggested, especially in economically less-developed countries with inadequate treatment service for patients with hemophilia. Dove 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9126152/ /pubmed/35615343 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S363132 Text en © 2022 Sasanakul et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Sasanakul, Werasak
Chuansumrit, Ampaiwan
Sirachainan, Nongnuch
Kadegasem, Praguywan
Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?
title Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?
title_full Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?
title_fullStr Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?
title_full_unstemmed Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?
title_short Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?
title_sort prominent mutation of intron 22 inversion in sporadic hemophilia: is it worth the antenatal screening?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9126152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35615343
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S363132
work_keys_str_mv AT sasanakulwerasak prominentmutationofintron22inversioninsporadichemophiliaisitworththeantenatalscreening
AT chuansumritampaiwan prominentmutationofintron22inversioninsporadichemophiliaisitworththeantenatalscreening
AT sirachainannongnuch prominentmutationofintron22inversioninsporadichemophiliaisitworththeantenatalscreening
AT kadegasempraguywan prominentmutationofintron22inversioninsporadichemophiliaisitworththeantenatalscreening